S
Sloppyseconds
Iron
- Joined
- May 24, 2020
- Posts
- 34
- Reputation
- 110
I noticed that women spend a disproportionate amount of time online complaining about incels, saying how they have a “shitty personality”, don’t take of their hygiene and “mistreat” women. This is ironic because most of their negative experiences stem from people they know rather than strangers (i.e: rape statistics). If a guy is “incel”, I doubt that they would even be in the girl's social circle in the first place. In terms of sheer hours spent together, women would mostly have been around their exes and attractive men in low-inhib environments, not so-called “incels”. Actual incels simply don’t have the “luxury” to mistreat a woman for extended periods of time. That’s why it really makes me think that this “incel” boogeyman is just a scapegoat for the true culprits of a women’s paranoia and trauma. Most of their negative experiences likely come from low-inhib dark-triadmaxxed bad boy thug/chad that pumped and dumped them than the “incels” themselves.
The men who shattered their hearts the most simply cannot be high-inhib autistic “incel” looking guys. Firstly, these guys mostly never attend parties or low-inhib social events because they don’t even get invited in the first place. Secondly, even if a guy harbours “misogynistic” views, they are mostly only comfortable with expressing them online. It requires unusually low-inhib (serial killer tier) for an autistic “incel” looking guy to openly spout vitriol at a woman’s face IRL. There’s just simply nothing to gain by doing that and are just digging their own grave for nothing.
You might say that an “incel” is more likely to sexually assault them at night when they’re walking alone. But if a woman’s instincts are as good as they say, then they wouldn’t even be walking alone in the first place at night. Most autistic “incels” at night are rotting at home playing video games, watching porn and probably browsing sites like this. Thus, statistically speaking, most incels aren’t even in their vicinity at nighttime. It would be too much effort for little reward for them to stand and wait in the cold at night to sexually assault a random woman. Instead they would rather stay at home all comfy and cozy enjoying their copes.
Yet for some reason, women tend to conflate their anger and trauma caused by low-inhib dark-triadmaxxed bad boy with the “misogynistic” comments online from “incels”. It’s like women like to superimpose the face of an incel on their abusive ex’s face to make them seem more “evil” to justify their own paranoia. Their chad ex-lovers basically leave behind a mess and the rest of the men have to suffer the aftermath. The aftermath that men have to deal with is the woman calling any criticism directed towards their life choices as “misogynistic” and of course the classic “found the incel”.
TL;DR: Women basically superimpose the face of an “incel” on their abusive ex-lovers to justify taking out their anger on men as a whole. The very “incels” that woman like to make fun of don’t really exist and are more of a caricature to cope with their interpersonal failings
The men who shattered their hearts the most simply cannot be high-inhib autistic “incel” looking guys. Firstly, these guys mostly never attend parties or low-inhib social events because they don’t even get invited in the first place. Secondly, even if a guy harbours “misogynistic” views, they are mostly only comfortable with expressing them online. It requires unusually low-inhib (serial killer tier) for an autistic “incel” looking guy to openly spout vitriol at a woman’s face IRL. There’s just simply nothing to gain by doing that and are just digging their own grave for nothing.
You might say that an “incel” is more likely to sexually assault them at night when they’re walking alone. But if a woman’s instincts are as good as they say, then they wouldn’t even be walking alone in the first place at night. Most autistic “incels” at night are rotting at home playing video games, watching porn and probably browsing sites like this. Thus, statistically speaking, most incels aren’t even in their vicinity at nighttime. It would be too much effort for little reward for them to stand and wait in the cold at night to sexually assault a random woman. Instead they would rather stay at home all comfy and cozy enjoying their copes.
Yet for some reason, women tend to conflate their anger and trauma caused by low-inhib dark-triadmaxxed bad boy with the “misogynistic” comments online from “incels”. It’s like women like to superimpose the face of an incel on their abusive ex’s face to make them seem more “evil” to justify their own paranoia. Their chad ex-lovers basically leave behind a mess and the rest of the men have to suffer the aftermath. The aftermath that men have to deal with is the woman calling any criticism directed towards their life choices as “misogynistic” and of course the classic “found the incel”.
TL;DR: Women basically superimpose the face of an “incel” on their abusive ex-lovers to justify taking out their anger on men as a whole. The very “incels” that woman like to make fun of don’t really exist and are more of a caricature to cope with their interpersonal failings
