MarstonAlloy
Trying to kill the ego
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2021
- Posts
- 2,327
- Reputation
- 2,754
By far the biggest misconception of Christ is his non-resistance, probably his most divisive and questionable. After all, humans have been resisting each other since the dawn of man; war seems instrinsic to our nature. And isn’t the one who turns the other cheek the epitome of weakness? Taking a softer route to avoid violence, at all costs? Muslims and atheists especially will laugh at this and call it impractical. But maybe Christ was seeing a pattern in men, maybe he had some sacred wisdom as to our ways and the best road to escape this pattern. I will be explaining non-resistance
non-resistance:
From the view of a stormfrontcel, this is heresy. Death of our trad Roman values! But you have to look where these values get you. They are romanticized in history, by Larpers. as Jesus said, “Look at the fruits they bear. A bad tree cannot bear good fruit, and a good tree bad ones. Thus, you will know them by your fruits.” You all live off the moral backbone of Christianity. Many live off the governments softness or good works of believers. What does worship of the strong get you, of men throughout history who have been called “great” but their fruits were only great in the suffering brought. Rome died by the sword. Caesar died by the sword. Hitler had millions of European brothers and sisters killed, As Did Napoleon, Alexander the Great brought down the largest and most advanced empire at the time. Yet for all his effort, it fractured into pieces and ended up with more fighting and dissonance, Every ruler who has taken up the road of enforcing their will and being remembered in history, has wrought the one thing everyone agrees to hate; suffering. Except Christ. His doctrine was pure peace and selflessness. After the Pentecost, the Early Christian’s spread his name throughout Rome totally peacefully, despite persecution. And eventually, it took over the entire empire itself, and set 1000 years of Christendom throughout Europe. Where is the weakness in this? Turn the other cheek so that you do not escalate and worsen conflict, and perpetuate a cycle and plant a seed that will lead to larger corruption, and to the same pitfalls that materialists fall into trying to fill the void. Christianity has brought the least suffering, at least where hegemonial authority is concerned, than any other idea or dogma that has been tried. So, when he says, “turn the other cheek” “live by the sword, die by the sword” he means the escape from this cycle and a rejection of our pride, which, as a sin, casts the body and soul into hell.
Christian hypocrisy:
Literally the only thing warmongers will bring up is the Crusades. By Christs definition, no it was not justified. But his vision of a Kingdom ON EARTH, not a ethnic group taking it up and feuding with another, so it can be argued that his vision was not purely tried. By literally everyone else’s standard, except for the impossibly high one set by Jesus (which I have said brings the least suffering to man) it was just a defense of their home. It is more on Muslims that they would be this evil at all, than Christian’s not being able to keep the Faith in their darkest time. That is why Christ transcends your nietzsche larp. He was talking about something inherent to all men.
Christ is King
