Warm Climate = Bigger Dick; Cold Climate = Smaller Dick. It is that simple.

[TalesFromTheSlums]

Look at the places known to have the biggest dicks. Where is that?

DR Congo -- hot/warm -- same with Africa. Blacks have biggest dicks.

South America by equator -- biggest dicks are leftmost, i.e., Ecuador.

But in many northern South American countries = bigger Average dick.

Dicks are usually SMALLER where it's colder, i.e., China, Russia, Siberia, etc.

Dicks are usually bigger in TROPICAL/TROPIC NEAR males, i.e., Cuba, Florida, South America.

Where you're near the equator your dick is far more likely to be bigger.

Where you're near too fast East & above equator, i.e., Europe, Middle East, Russia/Asia...

Dick is small. So explanation surrounding big dicks? HOT CLIMATE/LOCATION -- that's it.

Asians have smaller ones because above equator, cold, wrong side of Earth, etc.

 

[Gengar]

Temperature only affects your flaccid size, not your erect size.

 

[lastofus123]

Temperature only affects your flaccid size, not your erect size.

theres no racial difference, and besides explain why nigeria and tanzania have smaller than western average of 5.5

 

[lastofus123]

also theres this

essentially any study done on the congo is fake and exaggerated

 

[Gengar]

theres no racial difference, and besides explain why nigeria and tanzania have smaller than western average of 5.5

View attachment 3469004

1) Western average isn't 5.5", it's 5.16"/5.17".

2) I never said there's racial differences, all races are more or less the same on average.

 

[looksmaxxed]

primitive people care a lot about muhdik and will exaggerate it. almost all of these studies are survey based and inherently unreliable.

 

[playxiing]

dick size doesnt even matter unless its micro

 

[TalesFromTheSlums]

Temperature only affects your flaccid size, not your erect size.

Stretched flaccid predicts maximal size erect & potential more than anything else. So flaccid = often relevant to total size.

It's beyond obvious & provable that smaller flaccid usually correlates to smaller erect in the majority of cases -- not hard to grasp.

theres no racial difference, and besides explain why nigeria and tanzania have smaller than western average of 5.5

View attachment 3469004

Uh, that's flaccid ... You do know it's not unheard of for, you know, flaccid dicks to actually GROW when erect? Common knowledge.

You are talking of stretched flaccid. How stretchy the flaccid dick is depends on dynamic factors, not evidence of total size potential.

 

[secrecyT]

i must be born in antartica then

 

[Gengar]

Stretched flaccid predicts maximal size erect & potential more than anything else. So flaccid = often relevant to total size.

Not always, sometimes stretched flaccid is greater than erect or sometimes it is lesser.

It's beyond obvious & provable that smaller flaccid usually correlates to smaller erect in the majority of cases -- not hard to grasp.

Not really. See earlier point.

Either way, race has no effect on size. That's just myths.

 

[pfl]

Temperature only affects your flaccid size, not your erect size.

Over time and evolution it would affect overall size no?

 

[TalesFromTheSlums]

Either way, race has no effect on size. That's just myths.

You can't seriously believe that. Look at ANY Asian, Indian, EE region type porn. The guys are almost always smaller overall.

Now look at most American White, equator LatAM or Latino, Black, etc. They are usually bigger on average -- this is easy to PROVE.

It's incredibly easy & simple to prove this. I don't know what your argument is when you can look at porn & prove it easily.

To deny this is to deny obvious, factual, evidential differences in physiology & what determines penis size based on such.

Do you want to even make a deal or actually prove this to me? I can prove it to you by easily going by obvious, visual evidence.

You watch tons of porn and goon 24/7 anyways, so you denying this either means you only watch one kind or you're coping.

 

[Gengar]

You can't seriously believe that. Look at ANY Asian, Indian, EE region type porn. The guys are almost always smaller overall.

Now look at most American White, equator LatAM or Latino, Black, etc. They are usually bigger on average -- this is easy to PROVE.

It's incredibly easy & simple to prove this. I don't know what your argument is when you can look at porn & prove it easily.

To deny this is to deny obvious, factual, evidential differences in physiology & what determines penis size based on such.

Do you want to even make a deal or actually prove this to me? I can prove it to you by easily going by obvious, visual evidence.

You watch tons of porn and goon 24/7 anyways, so you denying this either means you only watch one kind or you're coping.

I think scientific studies are more reliable than porn, which involves heavy frauding. Speaking of East Asian region porn, they have only a few male actors that they use, so you cannot base your judgment on a very tiny selection of men, it makes no sense.

Using porn to prove anything is illogical because of the heavy frauding they do (in western porn), that's not real. Even porn stars claim to be 10+ inches when these don't exist.

 

[TalesFromTheSlums]

.I think scientific studies are more reliable than porn, which involves heavy frauding. Speaking of East Asian region porn, they have only a few male actors that they use, so you cannot base your judgment on a very tiny selection of men, it makes no sense.

Using porn to prove anything is illogical because of the heavy frauding they do (in western porn), that's not real. Even porn stars claim to be 10+ inches when these don't exist.

I've watched lots of foreign porn in my past years -- LOTS. Probably thousands of videos at minimum.

There are definitely far more than "a few male actors" in Asian porn -- I don't know where you get that from.

In my many years of porn in the past I can confidently state most Asian, Middle East, EE on average are smaller.

And in northern South America, Central America, Caribbean, some of North/South Africa, South U.S.A. are biggest.

So you'll typically find the most big dick men per capita in Florida, Cuba, caribbean, centra/south America, some Africa.

You will also find most of the smaller men in Eastern Europe, most of Asia, Russia, Siberia, Middle East, etc.

This does not mean exceptions don't exist -- of course they do. But most Asians are smaller than most Whites/Blacks.

But exceptions don't make the rule. According to tons of evidence it's obvious there are in fact "racial" differences in dick size.

 

[Gengar]

I've watched lots of foreign porn in my past years -- LOTS. Probably thousands of videos at minimum.

There are definitely far more than "a few male actors" in Asian porn -- I don't know where you get that from.

In my many years of porn in the past I can confidently state most Asian, Middle East, EE on average are smaller.

And in northern South America, Central America, Caribbean, some of North/South Africa, South U.S.A. are biggest.

So you'll typically find the most big dick men per capita in Florida, Cuba, caribbean, centra/south America, some Africa.

You will also find most of the smaller men in Eastern Europe, most of Asia, Russia, Siberia, Middle East, etc.

This does not mean exceptions don't exist -- of course they do. But most Asians are smaller than most Whites/Blacks.

But exceptions don't make the rule. According to tons of evidence it's obvious there are in fact "racial" differences in dick size.

All the studies, which were taken in different parts of the world have shown the same average, more or less. Even race-based studies showed the average was more or less the same for every race, the difference being minimal. These studies showed that East Asians had the same average as blacks and whites. You have an agenda but the scientific evidence does not support you, it supports me.

 

[TalesFromTheSlums]

Here's a picture proving it. Darker areas = bigger measured sizes.

These are not self-reported. This graph was from actual measurements.

As you can see, based on what I said, near the equator IN THESE REGIONS on Earth tend to have the biggest averages & biggest overall sizes found in general.

Now Europe is far higher, too far south is too low -- they are smaller. This also confirms: Europe, EE, Middle East, Russia, Asia, Australia are also typically smaller.

 

[TalesFromTheSlums]

All the studies, which were taken in different parts of the world have shown the same average, more or less. Even race-based studies showed the average was more or less the same for every race, the difference being minimal. These studies showed that East Asians had the same average as blacks and whites. You have an agenda but the scientific evidence does not support you, it supports me.

No, you have an agenda to cope. Everyone knows Asian men are smallest on average, and that Blacks are biggest on average.

This is a summarized approach as I already explained above and even showed a picture/proof showing where the highest averages.

You can reach or grasp for any "data" to try & prove this otherwise, but the reality is far different in practicality than on paper.

In reality, there is physiological data, evidence, anecdotes, & general facts showing why & how sizes vary between locations, peoples, etc.

 

[Gengar]

No, you have an agenda to cope. Everyone knows Asian men are smaller on average, and that Blacks are biggest on average.

You can reach or grasp for any "data" to try & prove this otherwise, but the reality is far different in practicality than on paper.

Neither are Asian men the smallest nor are blacks the biggest. You cannot provide me with legitimate studies that prove otherwise simply because they don't exist. End of discussion (unless you're trying to copemaxx, that is).

 

[Iooksmax]

India

 

[puniteking]

Girth> length

 

[TalesFromTheSlums]

Neither are Asian men the smallest nor are blacks the biggest. You cannot provide me with legitimate studies that prove otherwise simply because they don't exist. End of discussion (unless you're trying to copemaxx, that is).

Source? Source? Source? Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 threads of your user history, figures I'm debating a BBC brainrot copemaster gooner incel. A moron.

 

[Gengar]

Source? Source? Source? Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 threads of your user history, figures I'm debating a BBC brainrot copemaster. A moron.

All this rambling and still you couldn't provide me with a source because you're full of shit.

 

[Offensive Bias]

The super massive phalluses of South East Asia. Very credible theory OP.

 

[TalesFromTheSlums]

All this rambling and still you couldn't provide me with a source because you're full of shit.

Source?

 

[Gengar]

Source?

JuSt LooK at PorN.

 

[TalesFromTheSlums]

JuSt LooK at PorN.

That's not a source, buddy. I mean I need a source that proves I'm full of shit or wrong.

Without a source, how can I verify? I can't trust experience, eyesight, self awareness, common sense -- only sources, remember?

If someone shoots me, I'd need a source to verify I was shot. Did you know that there's no source you're a mod here?

I'm going to need a source that proves you're the mod here, or you can kindly fuck off. Where's your source, buddy?

 

[Gengar]

That's not a source, buddy. I mean I need a source that proves I'm full of shit or wrong.

Without a source, how can I verify? I can't trust words, common sense -- only sources.

You seriously cannot be this hurt just because you lost an argument?

 

[TalesFromTheSlums]

You seriously cannot be this hurt just because you lost an argument?

What argument? I'm waiting on a source. Without a source, there is no argument.

Remember how I was wrong because you said a source existed, and that's it? That's all?

Well, now you're wrong about anything you say tangentially because where's the source?

You need a source, valid credentials, experience, a degree to validate. So what's yours?

 

[Gengar]

What argument? I'm waiting on a source. Without a source, there is no argument.

You got debunked in your own thread.

 

[TalesFromTheSlums]

You got debunked in your own thread.

According to who? You? That's inherently biased.

You can't just stroll in and say "source" and automatically "win."

I know that's what you want to believe at this point, but it's not how it works.

In order to see who is debunked or not or who is "right" then ask a third party/vote.

 

[lastofus123]

JuSt LooK at PorN.

He is referencing muh BBC porn even though guys like Jason Luv who is known to be one of the biggest ones had an unfrauded 7 nbp

Don't get me wrong that's still massive but it goes to show how much frauding porn videos actually do and why it's not a legitimate source

 

[klip11]

Temperature only affects your flaccid size, not your erect size.

Stop trying to be all science and stuff

 

[Gengar]

According to who? You? That's inherently biased.

You can't just stroll in and say "source" and automatically "win."

I know that's what you want to believe at this point, but it's not how it works.

In order to see who is debunked or not or who is "right" ask a third party.

You have no scientific evidence to support your claim, whereas I do. You're just using porn as a source, you can't be this stupid.

 

[TalesFromTheSlums]

You have no scientific evidence to support your claim, whereas I do. You're just using porn as a source, you can't be this stupid.

Do you know how science works? Science isn't a perfect "right" or "wrong" confirmation or determination -- it's observation that's always open to argument. There is no one piece of any science that automatically holds a candle over any dismissal or claims against as more valid.

Evidence of something does not mean it's correct or right, to which nothing "unscientific" to the contrary can't dismiss.

The fact that you come in here acting all "science" proves you think "science = right" -- that's NOT what science is, little bro.

Science is not "Look, look! I got a paper that says 'X' so 'Y' is wrong! Hur hur!" Showing "science" doesn't mean you're right.

 

[Gengar]

He is referencing muh BBC porn even though guys like Jason Luv who is known to be one of the biggest ones had an unfrauded 7 nbp

Don't get me wrong that's still massive but it goes to show how much frauding porn videos actually do and why it's not a legitimate source

Yeah, exactly! Someone here with a sane mind and not brainwashed by porn like OP is. It's refreshing, thanks.

 

[klip11]

Neither are Asian men the smallest nor are blacks the biggest. You cannot provide me with legitimate studies that prove otherwise simply because they don't exist. End of discussion (unless you're trying to copemaxx, that is).

Dutch women are gengar enjoyers

 

[Gengar]

Do you know how science works? Science isn't a "right" or "wrong" -- it's observation that's always open to argument.

It sure as shit doesn't involve porn, which revolves around frauding? And there are too many studies that support me, not you. Like I pointed out.

 

[Gengar]

Dutch women are gengar enjoyers

No they don't.

 

[TalesFromTheSlums]

It sure as shit doesn't involve porn, which revolves around frauding? And there are too many studies that support me, not you. Like I pointed out.

Porn is common sense -- it's taking your eyes, a valid source, and determining if what you see makes fucking sense.

You can't have science confirming common sense because what's to confirm? It's something people live and see. It's autistic to think any data point in a piece of science automatically overrides and cancels out any opposing argument or anecdote because "it's science, bro!"

If what one sees is invalidated by science, then is one supposed to ignore everything they've learned because one conflicting data point?

Is that how you approach muh science? That's NOT how any actual science is supposed to be evaluted -- you're being a fucking Redditor. JFL

 

[lastofus123]

Yeah, exactly! Someone here with a sane mind and not brainwashed by porn like OP is. It's refreshing, thanks.

There was a pornstar that once made a 10k bet to every male pornstar asking them to show that they actually have a 10 inch cock irl or something to that effect, and to this day noone has done it despite so many claims coming from these porn stars that there "10+ inches"

 

[Gengar]

Porn is common sense -- it's taking your eyes, a valid source, and determining if what you see makes fucking sense.

You can't have science confirming common sense because what's to confirm? It's something people live and see. It's autistic to think any data point in a piece of science automatically overrides and cancels out any opposing argument or anecdote because "it's science, bro!"

If what one sees is invalidated by science, then is one supposed to ignore everything they've learned because one conflicting data point?

Is that how you approach muh science? That's NOT how any actual science is supposed to be evaluted -- you're being a fucking Redditor. JFL

Scientific studies are very important when it comes to dick sizes. And the studies have all shown that races were pretty much the same on average, if there were differences they were minimal. You are trying to downplay how minimal these differences are because you are biased, but you're still wrong since your average black or white isn't larger than the average East Asian.

 

[Gengar]

There was a pornstar that once made a 10k bet to every male pornstar asking them to show that they actually have a 10 inch cock irl or something to that effect, and to this day noone has done it despite so many claims coming from these porn stars that there "10+ inches"

It was just a female user on a forum but yeah, I know about this. Yet I'm willing to believe that the likes of OP believe 10 inch cocks are real because they saw it in porn.

 

[abcd]

My big russian cock disproves this

 

[TalesFromTheSlums]

Scientific studies are very important when it comes to dick sizes. And the studies have all shown that races were pretty much the same on average, if there were differences they were minimal. You are trying to downplay how minimal these differences are because you are biased, but you're still wrong since your average black or white isn't larger than the average East Asian.

Where are these studies? How were they done? Who paid for them? What ways did they determine said size so clearly?

Do you evidence or confirmation anyone actually measured and validated that mostly all men have cock sizes similarly, to only a small degree?

Where is the proof someone did this? Where is the evidence you so strongly keep latching on to like a retard, dying on this hill?

Let's hear from the people who did these "studies." Let's hear who paid for these "studies" & how they were actually done in reality.

 

[Gengar]

Where are these studies? How were they done? Who paid for them? What ways did they determine said size?

Do you evidence or confirmation anyone actually measured and validated that all men have cock sizes similarly, more or less?

Where is the proof someone did this? Where is the evidence you so strongly keep latching on to like a retard, dying on this hill?

Let's hear from the people who did these "studies." Let's hear who paid for these "studies" & how they were actually done.

You can google them, they are free to access for everyone. There's even a race-based study which involved Americans of all races. It showed the same results except for tiny differences, whites were pretty much the same as Asians (when rounded up).

 

[TalesFromTheSlums]

You can google them, they are free to access for everyone. There's even a race-based study which involved Americans of all races. It showed the same results except for tiny differences, whites were pretty much the same as Asians (when rounded up).

I'm not deep diving the entire web of studies to find only these specific ones you're talking about, to which I cannot know of even exist.

And I'm not taking any random study I see as irrefutable evidence of your claims that "mostly all men have very similar cock sizes."

Show me these studies you're specifically talking of if they're so important to this discussion.

I can't read your mind & know what specific data or "evidence" you're relying on to prove your point.

 

[Gengar]

I'm not deep diving the entire web of studies to find only these specific ones you're talking about, to which I cannot know of even exist.

And I'm not taking any random study I see as deterministic evidence of your claims. Show me these studies you're specifically talking of.

You can find a few of them on Wikipedia, just google "penis size" and scroll down to the "erect" subsection.

 

[klip11]

No they don't.

Stop being so modest

 

[Gengar]

Stop being so modest

They would prefer you over me because you're black and I'm brown.

 

[klip11]

They would prefer you over me because you're black and I'm brown.

We're all brown on the inside