"Wealth inequality" is a bullshit myth tbh

disillusioned

disillusioned

Fuchsia
Joined
Jan 2, 2019
Posts
11,185
Reputation
33,650
jfl quality of life is higher now than ever. Yes portions of the lower classes of the west are being screwed over by immigration but as a whole quality of life for most people on the planet has gone up over the last few decades. The bullshit myth about "growing inequality" is mostly born out of ignorance and is the byproduct of leftist propaganda. I remember how in the early 2000's only the rich could buy flatscreen TV's where as about 4-5 years ago one of my old buddies bought himself a 50inch Plasma to play his Xbox one on despite being merely an unskilled Domino's worker lmao.

Truth be told I'm not sure if this supposed "collapse of the west" would even happen at all if it wasn't for growing racial tensions.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MusicMaxxingMidget, BigBiceps, Deleted member 470 and 6 others
jfl quality of life is higher now than ever. Yes portions of the lower classes of the west are being screwed over by immigration but as a whole quality of life for most people on the planet has gone up over the last few decades. The bullshit myth about "growing inequality" is mostly born out of ignorance and is the byproduct of leftist propaganda. I remember how in the early 2000's only the rich could buy flatscreen TV's where as about 4-5 years ago one of my old buddies bought himself a 50inch Plasma to play his Xbox one on despite being merely an unskilled Domino's worker lmao.

Truth be told I'm not sure if this supposed "collapse of the west" would even happen at all if it wasn't for growing racial tensions.
yeah basically
 
jfl quality of life is higher now than ever. Yes portions of the lower classes of the west are being screwed over by immigration but as a whole quality of life for most people on the planet has gone up over the last few decades. The bullshit myth about "growing inequality" is mostly born out of ignorance and is the byproduct of leftist propaganda. I remember how in the early 2000's only the rich could buy flatscreen TV's where as about 4-5 years ago one of my old buddies bought himself a 50inch Plasma to play his Xbox one on despite being merely an unskilled Domino's worker lmao.

Truth be told I'm not sure if this supposed "collapse of the west" would even happen at all if it wasn't for growing racial tensions.
Categorically true
 
Low iq.

Wealth inequality is actually increasing.

And using cheap tvs and electronics as evidence that quality of life is improving is such poverty tier logic.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 6310, Bes, Deleted member 5683 and 16 others
someone post his avi im on phone
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 5683, AbandonShip and Danish_Retard
asing.
jfl quality of life is higher now than ever. Yes portions of the lower classes of the west are being screwed over by immigration but as a whole quality of life for most people on the planet has gone up over the last few decades. The bullshit myth about "growing inequality" is mostly born out of ignorance and is the byproduct of leftist propaganda. I remember how in the early 2000's only the rich could buy flatscreen TV's where as about 4-5 years ago one of my old buddies bought himself a 50inch Plasma to play his Xbox one on despite being merely an unskilled Domino's worker lmao.

Are you a protectionist? Nothing to do with the post, just curious.
 
Din rid
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5583
disillusioned
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6310, Deleted member 5683, MagickEvo and 1 other person
5E5AE1EF 0EC8 465F 958D 584ADB9F5E5A

9D235713 63B3 4017 BA64 6A0780DF54EC

BEC010E9 F5FA 4A1C 8C28 1C9F9C90D97C
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5683, ToursOverBoyo2020 and Danish_Retard
low iq post ngl. Fuck the rich. Do you think they care about you licking their boots? Jfl at you. Being a leftist economically will only benefit yourself and the working class. No reason some Jew who inherited more shekels than you will see in your life should have a chance to increase his capital while the lower classes stagnate.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5683, Ascensionrequired, diggbicc and 8 others
bootlicking faggot
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5683, ToursOverBoyo2020, Fear and 1 other person
Fuck communists kill them all
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3702 and Gosick
man i feel like sometimes u make good threads but i can't possibly take u serious with that avi
 
low iq post ngl. Fuck the rich. Do you think they care about you licking their boots? Jfl at you. Being a leftist economically will only benefit yourself and the working class. No reason some Jew who inherited more shekels than you will see in your life should have a chance to increase his capital while the lower classes stagnate.
 
Who fucking cares about a bunch of fucking graphs? Either your objective standards of living are better now than they were 10 years ago or they aren't.

And using cheap tvs and electronics as evidence that quality of life is improving is such poverty tier logic.

Why? Those are luxury goods. Being able to buy luxury is what makes people rich. There isn't really anybody outside of third world countries that can't even buy the basics like food.
 
Who fucking cares about a bunch of fucking graphs? Either your objective standards of living are better now than they were 10 years ago or they aren't.

higher standards of living doesn’t make the wealth inequality gap go away. The purpose of the graphs is to illustrate the point that income equality is real and rising.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5683, Deleted member 4430, Danish_Retard and 2 others
Care about your wealth. I don;t care how much money people make I do care how much I can earn
 
low iq post ngl. Fuck the rich. Do you think they care about you licking their boots? Jfl at you. Being a leftist economically will only benefit yourself and the working class. No reason some Jew who inherited more shekels than you will see in your life should have a chance to increase his capital while the lower classes stagnate.
Leftie economically will just fuck your country economy like it has happened all time some countey became socialist, and evetually will make your poorer.

As long as there is universal healthcare and good education, being leftie is judt retarded and simplistic populism. Anyone who works hard and makes good descisicions can became richer in a liberal economy.

The left takes 10€ from your pocket and returns you 4€. While the right gives you the freedom of spending the 10€ whatever you want.

Just look at good countries and their economic system. The rich class is the one that produces the richness thru their bussiness, attacking the upper class you evetually attack the lower class.

In Argentina they started to put a shit ton of taxes to the rich, and they all repercuted negativelly to the totallity of the population.

My country economy is being destroyed by the left.
 
  • +1
Reactions: diggbicc
low iq post ngl. Fuck the rich. Do you think they care about you licking their boots? Jfl at you. Being a leftist economically will only benefit yourself and the working class. No reason some Jew who inherited more shekels than you will see in your life should have a chance to increase his capital while the lower classes stagnate.
lol its funny how the left etc want wealth equality but dont realize that the jews are mainly to blame for this sort of stuff yet they have you guys in your back pockets due to you believing their propaganda.

it is what it is.


also fuck communism.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 275 and diggbicc
disillusioned tier post
 
Decrease taxes it's not like the richest pay anyway it's immigration that is making everyone poor
 
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard
higher standards of living doesn’t make the wealth inequality gap go away.

This is just typical resentment logic. Why do you even care about "muh wealth gap" if your quality of life is actually improving?
 
This is just typical resentment logic. Why do you even care about "muh wealth gap" if your quality of life is actually improving?

I never implied my feelings on the matter, I was responding to your claim that “wealth inequality is a bullshit myth”.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5683, Danish_Retard and hebbewem
wealth inequality = more people being born and thus lowering the value of labor
 
Did this guy seriously use flatscreens and Xbox as an example of a better quality of life.
200
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 6310, Bes, Deleted member 5683 and 3 others
I used to vote for the left in my past, because it used to be about wealth equality and higher rewards for labor. But now their agenda is all about global warming, identity politics, globalism and mass immigration.

That stuff doesn't benefit the avg person at all either and the climate change hysteria is one of the biggest scams in recent history.

In the end I can only conclude that it is over for politics, both the left and right, it's all the same honestly.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ascensionrequired, Subhuman Philtrum, diggbicc and 1 other person
Jfl the richest 1% have 47% of the wealth
 
Did this guy seriously use flatscreens and Xbox as an example of a better quality of life.
View attachment 409330

Why is that invalid? The whole fucking point of being rich is that you can buy useless but fun shit in excess of what is needed for the mere purposes of survival. It's literally not possible for somebody to afford 50 inch plasma tv's and xbox and for that person to still be poor. Unless they are just really terrible with money.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Ascensionrequired
Why is that invalid? The whole fucking point of being rich is that you can buy useless but fun shit in excess of what is needed for the mere purposes of survival. It's literally not possible for somebody to afford 50 inch plasma tv's and xbox and for that person to still be poor. Unless they are just really terrible with money.
?!? You can get a second-hand 50 inch plasma TV and an xbox for like 200 dollars total. That's like a third of what you would have to pay for rent for a month here. Or enough to buy your groceries for a month.


JFL man. Imagine calling someone rich for having a shitty tv like this but no groceries and no place to live. You could probably even get this shit for free if youre lucky. So rich wow.

Cde033b3 0828 49fb a848 3d02a0ce4d55 thumb480
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6310
Jfl the richest 1% have 47% of the wealth
Yes, because 99% of people are too stupid to gather any significant amounts of wealth. People just spend, spend and spend the money they don't have. Average person however lives more luxurious lives than medieval kings, so I wouldn't complain.
 
Yes, because 99% of people are too stupid to gather any significant amounts of wealth. People just spend, spend and spend the money they don't have. Average person however lives more luxurious lives than medieval kings, so I wouldn't complain.
Cope tbh, atleast with the way life is setup here in the netherlands. You are essentially paying like 80% of your total wages on taxes/living costs/forced (healthcare) insurances/required means of transportation, etc. Mostly things that you are forced to pay, only leaving you a small amount of money to trult do what you want to do with.

Someone that works a good full-time job and saves A LOT here, living frugally can save like 1000 dollars/month. Say 10k/year. You are never going to amass any decent amount of wealth that way. Average person is a slave, forced to work his entire life.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ascensionrequired
Cope tbh, atleast with the way life is setup here in the netherlands. You are essentially paying like 80% of your total wages on taxes/living costs/forced (healthcare) insurances/required means of transportation, etc. Mostly things that you are forced to pay, only leaving you a small amount of money to trult do what you want to do with.

Someone that works a good full-time job and saves A LOT here, living frugally can save like 1000 dollars/month. Say 10k/year. You are never going to amass any decent amount of wealth that way. Average person is a slave, forced to work his entire life.
Of course you won't make millions by being a wageslave, but average persons lifestyle matches that of a medieval king. You literally walk in to a store, you eat whatever you want. You drink whatever you want. You have a comfy bed, shower, all kinds of washing machines, so you don't wash your clothes or cutleries/plates etc. yourself. You live like a fucking king, it's great time to be a live, so stop complaining.
 
Of course you won't make millions by being a wageslave, but average persons lifestyle matches that of a medieval king. You literally walk in to a store, you eat whatever you want. You drink whatever you want. You have a comfy bed, shower, all kinds of washing machines, so you don't wash your clothes or cutleries/plates etc. yourself. You live like a fucking king, it's great time to be a live, so stop complaining.
Again big issue of thinking technological development is equal to life quality/lifestyle. A king had extremely high status, lots of women, didn't have to work, lots of power, he had slaves/workers and had extreme amounts of relative wealth over the typical peasant.

Comparing the lifestyle of a medieval king to that of some wojak wageslave because he has a comfier matrass, easy access to tasty chicken tendies and a hot shower is JFL tier.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ascensionrequired
Again big issue of thinking technological development is equal to life quality/lifestyle. A king had extremely high status, lots of women, didn't have to work, lots of power, he had slaves/workers and had extreme amounts of relative wealth over the typical peasant.

Comparing the lifestyle of a medieval king to that of some wojak wageslave because he has a comfier matrass, easy access to tasty chicken tendies and a hot shower is JFL tier.
Technological development is indeed equal to life quality/lifestyle. I can't wait what the world of tomorrow will bring. Simulation games, where you can be whoever you want, do whatever you want. Sex robots that will give bomb ass blowjobs, cook, and clean your house. Self driving cars, robots that will do most of the jobs so consumer goods will be cheaper than ever before.
I literally can't wait.
 
?!? You can get a second-hand 50 inch plasma TV and an xbox for like 200 dollars total.

That's literally my fucking point. In the past IT WASN'T POSSIBLE to get a 50 inc plasma and xbox for 200 bucks. Not even used. But now you can, because prices have gone down.

Again big issue of thinking technological development is equal to life quality/lifestyle.

dabe82d25a3b7a3c3f9e84c222f56892.jpg
 
Yes, because 99% of people are too stupid to gather any significant amounts of wealth. People just spend, spend and spend the money they don't have. Average person however lives more luxurious lives than medieval kings, so I wouldn't complain.
Youre calling 99 out of 100 people stupid
 
That's literally my fucking point. In the past IT WASN'T POSSIBLE to get a 50 inc plasma and xbox for 200 bucks. Not even used. But now you can, because prices have gone down.



dabe82d25a3b7a3c3f9e84c222f56892.jpg

Now tell me how having a shitty plasma tv and a xbox is supposed to make me happy and fullfilled. JFL @ falling for consumerism.


 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6310 and Aesthetics_III
Now tell me how having a shitty plasma tv and a xbox is supposed to make me happy and fullfilled. J

Fun experiment: Take away all your modern comforts and tell me how interesting your life is. 99% of humans have had shit uninteresting lives. For most of history sex and alcohol was literally all there was to do for 99% of humanity.

Jfl at thinking medieval peasants had better lives because they had more free time. Which btw isn't even really true because while they may have gotten more breaks from work there was also like 10x the amount of house work to do outside of working hours.
 
I remember how in the early 2000's only the rich could buy flatscreen TV's where as about 4-5 years ago one of my old buddies bought himself a 50inch Plasma to play his Xbox one on despite being merely an unskilled Domino's worker lmao.
That's because flatscreen TVs used to be more expensive since they were newer technology. Jfl at your retarded logic. Your example has nothing to do with improved quality of life nor wealth inequality
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6310
That's because flatscreen TVs used to be more expensive since they were newer technology.
You keep exposing how you understand absolutely nothing about how market economics actually work. Why do you think new technology is actually more expensive in the first fucking fucking place? It's because large scale production hasn't started yet and because the people who invested money into the technological innovation are trying to recuperate costs.

You are legit retarded if you don't think there is any relationship between the means of production becoming more advanced/productive and quality of life getting higher for the population. There is a reason for why people today enjoy higher quality of life than they did 100 years ago. Now we have AI giga-factories, where as before we did not. This means higher productive capacity which means more stuff for people to buy at lower prices.
 
Yes, because 99% of people are too stupid to gather any significant amounts of wealth. People just spend, spend and spend the money they don't have. Average person however lives more luxurious lives than medieval kings, so I wouldn't complain.
smh i was too stupid to be born to rich parents
billionaires truly just work 20,000x harder than the average person
 
smh i was too stupid to be born to rich parents
billionaires truly just work 20,000x harder than the average person
Billionaires often come from already wealthy families, but to become part of the 1% is very likely for a hard working and smart fella.
 
The only equality I care is pussy ownership equality.

from a global perspective there are still people dying from hunger.
 
smh i was too stupid to be born to rich parents
billionaires truly just work 20,000x harder than the average person
Billionaires have virtually no impact on your quality of life. Individual billionaires spend more money on goods than the average person does, but not so much that it actually impacts us. How much money do these people actually SPEND on goods for themselves vs the combined spending of everybody else? Without spending these people's money is just a number on a bank account that does nothing.

This is something almost nobody seems to understand. It's not actually so called wealth disparity that harms the poor, it's lack of access to goods & services. This also btw means that UBI would probably cause inflation to happen, despite what it's advocates claim. Give money to everybody and consumption will go up, which means more demand, which means inflation.
 

Similar threads

Sloppyseconds
Replies
16
Views
3K
lightswinning
lightswinning
got.daim
Replies
57
Views
4K
looksmaxxed
looksmaxxed

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top