saggyballsackcel
Green like the mofo grinch
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2024
- Posts
- 860
- Reputation
- 439
WARNING: low effort thread as always because I have un medicated adhd, SO SUCK MY COCK, anyways. Side profile to a degree, is cope, but not entirely. All good looking people have balanced side profiles, YES, BALANCED, what does this mean exactly? It means properly distributed bone mass for the most part. Allow me to explain in as few words possible. Take for example a west African/Bantu or mongoliod southeast Asian or East Asian side profile. The bone mass is almost entirely focused on the jaw, cheekbones, maybe ramus, not so much the chin, and quite barely the nose bridge or brow ridge. Between these two the differences are mainly Africans slightly less zygo, slightly deeper set eyes, maybe better nasal projection and the chin even tho quite recessed isn’t always actually undeveloped, the Asians, less deep set eyes but better overall orbits and zygos, and bit more chin projection, with SEA probably having the worst overall bone mass distribution but Very compact fwhr. Now, on the other end of the spectrum you have the overly dolicpehalic nose dominant skull, often also has chin recession but the chin is still pointed and sharp, this type of Bone mass distribution is most common in Arabs, Jews, some southern Europeans, and those who have some of there dna like Somalis. NEITHER is ideal, what is ideal is when someone’s jaw is still dominant, but they still have decent nasal projection and nose defintion. Here are examples of BAD side profiles:
What’s makes them so unaesthetic? It’s the improper and uneven distribution of bone mass. Some of these are lacking good bone defintion in general, but it’s just to point to a general rule of thumb of how bone mass is distributed among people, doesn’t matter how strong one’s jaw is, if they don’t have good nasal projection, chin development/projection and deep set eyes they’ll be subhuman, and although a high nose bridge arab or Spaniard with eyebrow and eyelash halo will be aesthetic To maybe ltb Asian foids and black chicks he’s still not good aesthetics overall because his skull looks like a fuckkin airplane. Now here are examples of skulls where the bone mass isn’t ideally distributed but it’s still much better then examples above
Slightly nose or jaw dominant, slightly more forward or backward leaning but still overall well distributed.
Now, here are actual good examples of proper side profiles :
What’s makes them so unaesthetic? It’s the improper and uneven distribution of bone mass. Some of these are lacking good bone defintion in general, but it’s just to point to a general rule of thumb of how bone mass is distributed among people, doesn’t matter how strong one’s jaw is, if they don’t have good nasal projection, chin development/projection and deep set eyes they’ll be subhuman, and although a high nose bridge arab or Spaniard with eyebrow and eyelash halo will be aesthetic To maybe ltb Asian foids and black chicks he’s still not good aesthetics overall because his skull looks like a fuckkin airplane. Now here are examples of skulls where the bone mass isn’t ideally distributed but it’s still much better then examples above
Slightly nose or jaw dominant, slightly more forward or backward leaning but still overall well distributed.
Now, here are actual good examples of proper side profiles :
