What are common Indian features ( failos)

billymidnight

billymidnight

Beautiful face, ugly soul
Joined
Apr 23, 2024
Posts
3,724
Reputation
4,140
title
 
  • +1
Reactions: Costcosuperstore and Nick.Harte
Too big of a cock
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: zyzzbrah1234, Costcosuperstore, Mosh12 and 2 others
too much smv
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: AverageCurryEnjoyer, zyzzbrah1234, bakpaokukus and 4 others
shit genes
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Costcosuperstore, Saint Casanova and Carbine
eye area
 
  • +1
Reactions: Carbine, Costcosuperstore and billymidnight
Currycel myself. Being shit skinned imo is the biggest failo
 
  • +1
Reactions: Costcosuperstore, MrShimano and billymidnight
Currycel myself. Being shit skinned imo is the biggest failo
I never uunderstand why being dark skinned as an Indian is a failo but dark dark skinned Latinos still mog. Maybe horrible Indian features make dark skin appear under desirable
 
I never uunderstand why being dark skinned as an Indian is a failo but dark dark skinned Latinos still mog. Maybe horrible Indian features make dark skin appear under desirable
Being dark skinned latino is also a falio. In Brazil women literally refuse to date those Pardo niggas
 
I never uunderstand why being dark skinned as an Indian is a failo but dark dark skinned Latinos still mog. Maybe horrible Indian features make dark skin appear under desirable
Because you look like actual shit :lul:
 
  • Woah
Reactions: billymidnight
Being dark skinned latino is also a falio. In Brazil women literally refuse to date those Pardo niggas
I’m not saying is isn’t a failo in a societal aspect but what I was trying to say is that even Latinos being dark skinned ( even the ones who don’t have African blood) they still look very good on average due to European mixed features. So this proves that so long as a person has great features skin colour doesn’t really matter
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel
Everything ig
 
  • +1
Reactions: billymidnight
How dark are we talking ? Are you literally black?
I'm not dark. I have other horrible failos. But I'm saying that other dark skinned South Asians look like that
 
  • +1
Reactions: billymidnight
I'm not dark. I have other horrible failos. But I'm saying that other dark skinned South Asians look like that
Ppl normally assume that they’re colouring is there worst failo but tbh it really isn’t . It’s their horrible facial features and skulls which are holding them back
 
I’m not saying is isn’t a failo in a societal aspect but what I was trying to say is that even Latinos being dark skinned ( even the ones who don’t have African blood) they still look very good on average due to European mixed features. So this proves that so long as a person has great features skin colour doesn’t really matter
Most latinos look like dysgenic mutts even the ones with european blood.
 
I never uunderstand why being dark skinned as an Indian is a failo but dark dark skinned Latinos still mog. Maybe horrible Indian features make dark skin appear under desirable
Maybe it’s the undertones that South Asians have that others don’t have.
 
  • +1
Reactions: notalive and billymidnight
Ironically many south american mutts also can pass as Indians too

1000126755



Paqueta looks curry

1000126756



Rodrygo also looks Indian

1000126757
 
Maybe it’s the undertones that South Asians have that others don’t have.
South Asians have more yellow undertones and Latinos have more red undertones, yes?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
I’m not saying is isn’t a failo in a societal aspect but what I was trying to say is that even Latinos being dark skinned ( even the ones who don’t have African blood) they still look very good on average due to European mixed features. So this proves that so long as a person has great features skin colour doesn’t really matter
It's different with Indians
With White/Latino/other races if the parent is good looking, it often correlates to the child having good genes
With Indians it is a complete toss up

The correlation is much much weaker. Good genes don't translate, because they aren't good themselves

But yes, Latinos have European ancestry
So they have Eurocentric features
 
  • +1
Reactions: billymidnight
It's different with Indians
With White/Latino/other races if the parent is good looking, it often correlates to the child having good genes
With Indians it is a complete toss up



The correlation is much much weaker. Good genes don't translate, because they aren't good themselves

But yes, Latinos have European ancestry
So they have Eurocentric features
What kind of bullshit theory crafting is this? Lmao. Niggas pulling shit straight out of their asses. Just look at celebrity kids most of Brad pitt, johnny deep, Beckham's spawns. Good genes have never guaranteed
Genetic combination is random only thing that you fan somewhat dictate is phenotype and height. Also false most latinos are triracial. Only Argentinians are more than 80% european the rest are around 30-40%. In central america it is 60-70%
 
  • +1
Reactions: vernier, billymidnight and greycel
Lmao if any1 saw paqueta they would never think he is curry lol , assume a Hispanic country his facial features are good enough to make him not look Indian or paki
The west ham commentator literally thought he was an Indian and good facial features has nothing to do with race you talk like a typical racist retard. Paqueta doesn't even look good.
 
What kind of bullshit theory crafting is this? Lmao. Niggas pulling shit straight out of their asses. Just look at celebrity kids most of Brad pitt, johnny deep, Beckham's spawns. Good genes have never guaranteed
Genetic combination is random only thing that you fan somewhat dictate is phenotype and height. Also false most latinos are triracial. Only Argentinians are more than 80% european the rest are around 20-30%.
Yes, but the European ancestry shows
Even for African Americans who are 20-30%:
1732388738874


Also I'm not saying other races aren't affected by genetic recomb. I'm saying Indians are affected by it the most
Likely due to larger diversity is my theory
Asians I've noticed with least among parents and child. Likely because of less phenotypical diversity in a given region
 

Similar threads

klip11
Replies
10
Views
92
klip11
klip11
Bug
Replies
65
Views
732
Troglodyte452
Troglodyte452
billymidnight
Replies
32
Views
310
rin_11
rin_11
SecularIslamist
Replies
13
Views
220
Donquixote
Donquixote

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top