What does facial harmony mean?

Deleted member 5052

Deleted member 5052

Solstice
Joined
Feb 2, 2020
Posts
2,278
Reputation
3,553
No one seems to have clear idea about what facial harmony actually means. Everyone seems to have different opinions about it. Is it facial ratios and proportions, averageness of features, colouring or phenotype??
 
  • +1
Reactions: angelo
can't be explained OP
 
Chico
 
  • +1
Reactions: KhakiPeach67, needsolution, Cope and 2 others
ratios
 
  • +1
Reactions: KhakiPeach67
Harmony comes down to how well your facial features blend together, so basically all of what you said above.
 
  • +1
Reactions: KhakiPeach67 and Good_Little_Goy
The non-specific term ‘facial harmony’ refers to this proportional interrelationship of the various facial aesthetic units.

The terms balance and harmony are often used by clinicians when describing facial aesthetics. Left-right balance of the face
refers to symmetrical relationships, whereas balance between the vertical facial thirds refers to proportional relationships. The term harmonious proportions again refers to ideal proportional relationships, whereas a harmonious facial profile often simply means a profile that is pleasing to the eye. Both these terms are non-specific and in the clinical setting may serve to confuse. The terms balance and harmony should ideally only be employed when the particular aspect being described is clearly specified; otherwise it is better to employ accurate and quantifiable terms, such as symmetry and proportion, when describing craniofacial morphology.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6273, Perfect Hairline and PubertyMaxxer
It's a giant cope. Incels use this when they struggle to explain why a person is attractive.
There's no harmony.
There are good features together and sometimes even having one of them would make you attractive to others. (Like only having a really good lower third/hunter eye area etc.)

Also i've never seen a chad or gigachad who look only harmonious.

Chads always have bunch of gl features at the same time together so we can easily detect why exactly they are chads.
However if you look a chadlite like Timothee bugeyed Chalamet, even if he has a really ugly eyes, he still has decent jaw, top tier quality hair and nice skin with light brown eyes. So his face is not harmonius, he just have lots of good features. Since he has cuckeyes, narrow frame so he's not and won't be a chad.

Let's think Chico for example. He is 6'4 guy with high quality hair and he has boyish youthful look with nice nose and lips also decent eyes (minimal uee, kinda prominent eyebrow) and finally top tier lower third. (Gonial angle, symmetry, wide as zygos.)
So he has bunch of goodlooking features together.
However, some low people say "no striking features but harmony".
No.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Looks234
Harmony comes down to how well your facial features blend together, so basically all of what you said above.
So how is there any objectivity to it? It will change with each person for what they find beautiful.
 
It's a giant cope. Incels use this when they struggle to explain why a person is attractive.
There's no harmony.
There are good features together and sometimes even having one of them would make you attractive to others. (Like only having a really good lower third/hunter eye area etc.)

Also i've never seen a chad or gigachad who look only harmonious.

Chads always have bunch of gl features at the same time together so we can easily detect why exactly they are chads.
However if you look a chadlite like Timothee bugeyed Chalamet, even if he has a really ugly eyes, he still has decent jaw, top tier quality hair and nice skin with light brown eyes. So his face is not harmonius, he just have lots of good features. Since he has cuckeyes, narrow frame so he's not and won't be a chad.

Let's think Chico for example. He is 6'4 guy with high quality hair and he has boyish youthful look with nice nose and lips also decent eyes (minimal uee, kinda prominent eyebrow) and finally top tier lower third. (Gonial angle, symmetry, wide as zygos.)
So he has bunch of goodlooking features together.
However, some low people say "no striking features but harmony".
No.
Chico's lower third is nowhere near top tier. But a rather bunch of average features acting well together. Like his ramus itself is not tall, but due to high set ears it appears to be tall. Also his chin seems to be rather weak from side profile. His bigonial width is average at best.
 
7FE68E4B 0AD6 4B89 87DA F436BE27E83A
9C36789F FC78 408F 9AF8 E170B89A61BA
 
Chico's lower third is nowhere near top tier. But a rather bunch of average features acting well together. Like his ramus itself is not tall, but due to high set ears it appears to be tall. Also his chin seems to be rather weak from side profile. His bigonial width is average at best.
there is nothing average on that guy's face, you are so deluded.
also how is this ramus not tall ? taller than this making him become ogre.
1111111111111111111
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2205 and Deleted member 2227

Similar threads

JefeM0g
Replies
15
Views
592
stribor
S
JustBeConfidentBruh
Replies
43
Views
892
JustBeConfidentBruh
JustBeConfidentBruh
shredmaxer
Replies
10
Views
895
nobodyspecial369
N
appealmaxed
Replies
26
Views
583
vioytaka
vioytaka

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top