Sal123
Diamond
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2019
- Posts
- 1,408
- Reputation
- 1,132
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
nah just shitskin hindu cope, no jews involvedIs this the same jewish bullcrap like that black skinned blue eyed nigger girl they remade from some british skeleton?
face it boyo we curries are your overlordsIs this the same jewish bullcrap like that black skinned blue eyed nigger girl they remade from some british skeleton?
The Indians of that area were probably white at the time (Northern India and Pakistan).YALL R CURRY
zionist hindus and zionist jews are working together nownah just shitskin hindu cope, no jews involved
you are nothing more but whitened curriesWhy are you trying to bash whites bro
Copeyou are nothing more but whitened curries
evidence is right there you idiotCope
Oh, I just read the pic, this is probably bullshit leftist propaganda. Plus, there's a big difference between Northern Indians and sub-human Dravidians down south.YALL R CURRY
I guess but I'm pretty sure the one behind the (((research))) I was talking about was a kike. Pretty funny if you think about it cause even if this were true they were simply developing lighter skin due to dietary change.nah just shitskin hindu cope, no jews involved
dravidians mogOh, I just read the pic, this is probably bullshit leftist propaganda. Plus, there's a big difference between Northern Indians and sub-human Dravidians down south.
dravidians are not subhuman tbh but yes there is a major differenceOh, I just read the pic, this is probably bullshit leftist propaganda. Plus, there's a big difference between Northern Indians and sub-human Dravidians down south.
The curries back then in Pakistan and Northern India were white. Also, white people have the best history and civilizations, Asians 2nd (Japanese, Chinese, Koreans, even the South East Asians), and what do you have? Exactly.Oh my gosh. Over for Europeans. Yall are curries. Thank god I'm mulatto and not European
What is true for fact is Jews transformed Europe from a nation that believed in god to a practically godless state. How sadIs this the same jewish bullcrap like that black skinned blue eyed nigger girl they remade from some british skeleton?
you are half curry and half fried chickenOh my gosh. Over for Europeans. Yall are curries. Thank god I'm mulatto and not European
nah just shitskin hindu cope, no jews involved
Christianity is jewish by it's roots, it had no place in Europe.What is true for fact is Jews transformed Europe from a nation that believed in god to a practically godless state. How sad
I guess but I'm pretty sure the one behind the (((research))) I was talking about was a kike. Pretty funny if you think about it cause even if this were true they were simply developing lighter skin due to dietary change.
The Indians of that area were probably white at the time (Northern India and Pakistan).
No you dumb fuck, my point was the guy behind the research was a literal kikeReasearch isn't jewish jesus fucking christ the iq of this site seems to be plank scale literally everyone makes claims without backing them up
Speculations without citations is the eqivalent of cuck tears thinking
What is true for fact is Jews transformed Europe from a nation that believed in god to a practic
I heard a theory that the people that inhabited what is now today Pakistan and Northern India were closer to Iranians in terms of race and ethnicity. The Dravidians may have been a nomadic people that traveled from Africa and settled in Southern India or something close to that.Reasearch isn't jewish jesus fucking christ the iq of this site seems to be plank scale literally everyone makes claims without backing them up
No you dumb fuck, my point was the guy behind the research was a literal kike
White skin is a good mutation.1 the descent of the person is irrelevant.
2 to think white skin has always been around is an argument in pure dishonesty white skin a mutation.
3 the people were blue eyes as well so they still Europeans.
Your low IQ is showing, then again I forgot I was talking to a literal diagnosed autist1 the descent of the person is irrelevant.
2 to think white skin has always been around is an argument in pure dishonesty white skin a mutation.
3 the people were blue eyes as well so they still Europeans.
White skin is a good mutation.
Your low IQ is showing, then again I forgot I was talking to a literal diagnosed autist
How do you know if darker skin was first?But mutation no? And good is down to enviroment for instance white skin is cancerous in desert environments or African environments in terms of natural selection what is good is relative
Oh pls tell me where I am wrong are you denying white skin is a mutation?
How do you know if darker skin was first?
Race is very real, everything from skull shape to IQ.Our of Africa theory tbqh though the concept of race is denied by most anthropologists
Race is very real, everything from skull shape to IQ.
How do you know if darker skin was first?
I think that's probably true too. I'm not sure about the Dravidians thoughI heard a theory that the people that inhabited what is now today Pakistan and Northern India were closer to Iranians in terms of race and ethnicity. The Dravidians may have been a nomadic people that traveled from Africa and settled in Southern India or something close to that.
That's not where you were wrong, and I never said it wasn'tBut mutation no? And good is down to enviroment for instance white skin is cancerous in desert environments or African environments in terms of natural selection what is good is relative
Oh pls tell me where I am wrong are you denying white skin is a mutation?
But the Jews infiltrated Europe anyways regardless of Christianity.Christianity is jewish by it's roots, it had no place in Europe.
true it was Christians afterall who were often against themBut the Jews infiltrated Europe anyways regardless of Christianity.
This is true bro. Keep destroying these coping sfcelsIncorrect most scholars don't even agree on race.
As for the iq holy fuck this shit has been debated and debunked most of it is cultural for instance look at shit holes like africa they have lower iq than whites in terms of the white context which measures academic intelligence but blacks have higher iq in different standards iq is a subjective standard over all.
I think i should also mention most variations distinguishing races are not actually distinguished factors if you both started off as human but have gained adaptations like blonde hair blue eyes your still human your no less human then you were before.
For instance blue eyes was a favorable aesthetic mutation that occurred in the Europeans cause the conditions called for it but are they less human or are they different ? you've added parts but their the same thing their not any less human it's not like they gained a fucking genetic mutation that made them non human.
because white skin in africa without culture is literal death.How do you know if darker skin was first?
Is this the same jewish bullcrap like that black skinned blue eyed nigger girl they remade from some british skeleton?
That's not where you were wrong, and I never said it wasn't
Instant chance of skin cancer if exposure to sun - r u ok in the headWhite skin is a good mutation.
This is true bro. Keep destroying these coping sfcels
Instant chance of skin cancer if exposure to sun - r u ok in the head
And Jews started the political system in which religion is put on a lower level than politics. So Europe lost either way . Now it’s a miserable place oozing with dipression and mental healthtrue it was Christians afterall who were often against them
Look up the Bell Curve. And those scholars say that because they will be ousted by their own peers for saying otherwise. Also, when given fishing nets to use for fishing (also told what it's for) they use it for covers at night instead. Africans are not smart. I live near black people and very few are high functioning.Incorrect most scholars don't even agree on race.
As for the iq holy fuck this shit has been debated and debunked most of it is cultural for instance look at shit holes like africa they have lower iq than whites in terms of the white context which measures academic intelligence but blacks have higher iq in different standards iq is a subjective standard over all.
I think i should also mention most variations distinguishing races are not actually distinguished factors if you both started off as human but have gained adaptations like blonde hair blue eyes your still human your no less human then you were before.
For instance blue eyes was a favorable aesthetic mutation that occurred in the Europeans cause the conditions called for it but are they less human or are they different ? you've added parts but their the same thing their not any less human it's not like they gained a fucking genetic mutation that made them non human.
Look up the Bell Curve. And those scholars say that because they will be ousted by their own peers for saying otherwise.
Sun screen or some shit to cover it up, it's not really a big deal. Plus, white women and every other woman seems to prefer it. Plus, you look white as fuck.Instant chance of skin cancer if exposure to sun - r u ok in the head
Can you explain though why so many blacks can't function on a normal level? Name one black country that isn't a shithole. No matter how much you try raising them, they will not turn out as smart as a white kid will. Intelligence is largely genetic (it's also envirometal, but I bielieve this is overblown).The bell curve has been debunked http://mdcbowen.org/p2/rm/debunk/dBell.htm
He uses many arguments http://mdcbowen.org/p2/rm/debunk/dBellNaz.htm That just shows you the racist history already connected within the back ground assumptions so any arguments you make from here on already has a implicit bias that race and iq is linked it's presupposed and were back wards with the conclusion already given