WHAT HAPPENED TO JUSTIN BIEBER HERE?!

[trumpwillwin]

2021



-

2023


-

Tried to find two pictures that represent the same angle. These are almost identical angles for comparison sake.
Why does he look better in the first picture?
His nose looks kind of different now/forehead looks recessed/zygos are more prominent? Which is supposedly good? But why does it look worse?

 

[Deleted member 31155]

either he mouthbreathed and got downgrown or he did orthognathic surgery which impacted his looks severely in the long term.

 

[Deleted member 18582]

from breedable to joke

 

[LowTrust]

loose ramus skin, more fat around perioral mound area

 

[Deleted member 29167]

prettyboys always age like shit, water

also FUCK JEWS

 

[trumpwillwin]

from breedable to joke

Check dms

 

[DelonLover1999]

"recessed forehead" lmao

 

[trumpwillwin]

l

"recessed forehead" lmao

lmaoooooo ngl. I popped off with that one


what do you think overall?

 

[DelonLover1999]

what do you think overall?

That he looks pretty much the same and that you're tripping balls.

If anything, he looks better in the second pic. Haircut is better (even tho the cap covers it), complexion appears healthier due to lighting probably, and you can actually see his face properly, unlike the first one. Mandible looks slightly worse, but that's because he's rotating his neck.

I've seen you use this photo (1st one) multiple times. Even as an example of deep set eyes, when, in fact, his don't sit very deep. I just think you have some weird fixation with this particular picture, for some reason. It doesn't look anything special to me. He's got plenty better ones.

 

[trumpwillwin]

That he looks pretty much the same and that you're tripping balls.

If anything, he looks better in the second pic. Haircut is better (even tho the cap covers it), complexion appears healthier due to lighting probably, and you can actually see his face properly, unlike the first one. Mandible looks slightly worse, but that's because he's rotating his neck.

I've seen you use this photo (1st one) multiple times. Even as an example of deep set eyes, when, in fact, his aren't very deep set. I just think you have some weird fixation with this particular picture, for some reason. It doesn't look anything special to me. He has plenty better ones.

look at that his cheeks near his eyes blend into his chin. its such a pretty curve. it looks so nice.

also his midface seems so nice projected and his nose is perfect.

his forehead looks youthful too

what do you think?

 

[DelonLover1999]

look at that his cheeks near his eyes blend into his chin. its such a pretty curve. it looks so nice.

that's called the ogee curve, it does look good. But it's nothing other-worldly, many people have similar ones in 3/4 view.

also his midface seems so nice projected and his nose is perfect.

It's just as projected in the second one. Nose actually looks better even, cause you can see it clearly.

his forehead looks youthful too

It's just smooth lmao, literally nothing special about it.

Lighting is probably the number 1 thing causing the discrepancies. That and how close the camera is to his face. I think you're just enamored with a picture and want to rationalize your perception with "objective" explanations. If you think it looks good, fine by me. I personally think it's a pretty unflattering photo. 2 Looks better.

And rest assured, he didn't have any type of hardmaxxing between these two photos. Absolutely none, zero.