What Is The Optimal Diet?

lucasman

lucasman

Iron
Joined
Aug 18, 2024
Posts
121
Reputation
63
After doing a solid amount of research, it seems that a meat/fish focused diet is optimal for skin coloration, testosterone, with an incorporation of various raw fruits and vegetables. Of course avoiding processed foods and seed oils, artificial sweeteners is a given, but contrary to what many say, it doesn't seem like raw meats and milk is as essential as they claim. Sure, in some cases, they provide improvements as opposed to their cooked counterparts, but the difference in nutrients seems abysmal. Any thoughts on what the optimal diet is?
 
After doing a solid amount of research, it seems that a meat/fish focused diet is optimal for skin coloration, testosterone, with an incorporation of various raw fruits and vegetables. Of course avoiding processed foods and seed oils, artificial sweeteners is a given, but contrary to what many say, it doesn't seem like raw meats and milk is as essential as they claim. Sure, in some cases, they provide improvements as opposed to their cooked counterparts, but the difference in nutrients seems abysmal. Any thoughts on what the optimal diet is?
1. don’t eat anything that didn’t exist 200 years ago
2. eat a varied diet of meat, fish, fruits, vegetables, nuts, etc.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lovemaxxed
Ground beef and ice cream
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: lucasman
1. don’t eat anything that didn’t exist 200 years ago
2. eat a varied diet of meat, fish, fruits, vegetables, nuts, etc.
nice type o neg pfp btw, but this is stupid because
-various healthy foods exist post 200 years ago, such as natto, avocado oil, kimchi, etc, not to mention that GMO aren't necessarily unhealthy, such that almost all modern fruit and vegetables are modified to some extent, some are just bred to repel certain insects

-furthermore, this seems more of a rough outline instead of specific and optimized input
 
Check out the book "Nutrition and Physical Degeneration" by Wenston Price, goes into the idea of there being diets tied to specific group's ancestry, very interesting shit
 
Check out the book "Nutrition and Physical Degeneration" by Wenston Price, goes into the idea of there being diets tied to specific group's ancestry, very interesting shit
specific group ancestry? is it because certain groups have different biological needs?
will give it a read
 
nice type o neg pfp btw, but this is stupid because
-various healthy foods exist post 200 years ago, such as natto, avocado oil, kimchi, etc, not to mention that GMO aren't necessarily unhealthy, such that almost all modern fruit and vegetables are modified to some extent, some are just bred to repel certain insects

-furthermore, this seems more of a rough outline instead of specific and optimized input
ty for the pfp >.<
abt the food: im saying 200 years ago generally, take it with a grain of salt. of course, you should be the ultimate judge of your nutrition. i myself use coconut butter while cooking, which isn’t a very old discovery. avoid processed foods and try to eat the most natural possible. if we go into details, a great diet could be 60% meat/fish, 15% vegetables, 15% fruits and 10% everything else. always vary your protein from beef to fish to chicken to nuts and make sure to hydrate yourself plenty. however, the % depend on the person, as the optimal ratios are impacted genetically and vary from one person to another.
 
specific group ancestry? is it because certain groups have different biological needs?
will give it a read
Our fundamental needs are essentially the same (amino, fatty, vitamins and calories overall) but we have differences when it comes to stuff like lactose intolerance, depending on if you and your ancestors lived somewhere with high dairy production or vitamin d synthesis, because of skin-tone adaptations
 
Avoid meat and animal fat.

They cause cancer, diabetes, and early deaths.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AryanSchizo
After doing a solid amount of research, it seems that a meat/fish focused diet is optimal for skin coloration, testosterone, with an incorporation of various raw fruits and vegetables. Of course avoiding processed foods and seed oils, artificial sweeteners is a given, but contrary to what many say, it doesn't seem like raw meats and milk is as essential as they claim. Sure, in some cases, they provide improvements as opposed to their cooked counterparts, but the difference in nutrients seems abysmal. Any thoughts on what the optimal diet is?
Just guzzle down sunflower oil with nutella dude
 
After doing a solid amount of research, it seems that a meat/fish focused diet is optimal for skin coloration, testosterone, with an incorporation of various raw fruits and vegetables. Of course avoiding processed foods and seed oils, artificial sweeteners is a given, but contrary to what many say, it doesn't seem like raw meats and milk is as essential as they claim. Sure, in some cases, they provide improvements as opposed to their cooked counterparts, but the difference in nutrients seems abysmal. Any thoughts on what the optimal diet is?
Paleo diet
 
ty for the pfp >.<
abt the food: im saying 200 years ago generally, take it with a grain of salt. of course, you should be the ultimate judge of your nutrition. i myself use coconut butter while cooking, which isn’t a very old discovery. avoid processed foods and try to eat the most natural possible. if we go into details, a great diet could be 60% meat/fish, 15% vegetables, 15% fruits and 10% everything else. always vary your protein from beef to fish to chicken to nuts and make sure to hydrate yourself plenty. however, the % depend on the person, as the optimal ratios are impacted genetically and vary from one person to another.
thoughts on raw primal and Aajonus Vonderplanitz?
 
thoughts on raw primal and Aajonus Vonderplanitz?
raw primal sounds good but when you take into account that most amino acids don’t get absorbed when the meat is raw, it makes you reconsider it all. with cooked meat, a lot more nutrients are absorbed. honestly, i eat raw eggs with rice (jst mix it all it’s so good) but raw meat, i eat it about once a month.
 
After doing a solid amount of research, it seems that a meat/fish focused diet is optimal for skin coloration, testosterone, with an incorporation of various raw fruits and vegetables. Of course avoiding processed foods and seed oils, artificial sweeteners is a given, but contrary to what many say, it doesn't seem like raw meats and milk is as essential as they claim. Sure, in some cases, they provide improvements as opposed to their cooked counterparts, but the difference in nutrients seems abysmal. Any thoughts on what the optimal diet is?
High quality animals. Plants were never a feature of the human diet until the agricultural age, and even then the plants we eat now did not exist back then, they're all man-made. If anyone wants to start another argument about this, the bio-availability of nutrients in any plant are proof that we aren't adapted to them. Even modern fruits that we have engineered to be more edible are still woefully poor in bio-availability.

Regarding cooked vs raw, like you researched, there's not as much difference as goatis likes to think. The studies on drastic nutrient loss pertain to cooking methods like boiling where nutrients are leeched into fluids. Searing meat costs almost zero nutrients. I find that organs taste better raw though.
 
High quality animals. Plants were never a feature of the human diet until the agricultural age, and even then the plants we eat now did not exist back then, they're all man-made. If anyone wants to start another argument about this, the bio-availability of nutrients in any plant are proof that we aren't adapted to them. Even modern fruits that we have engineered to be more edible are still woefully poor in bio-availability.

Regarding cooked vs raw, like you researched, there's not as much difference as goatis likes to think. The studies on drastic nutrient loss pertain to cooking methods like boiling where nutrients are leeched into fluids. Searing meat costs almost zero nutrients. I find that organs taste better raw though.
i like this argument, however, it's a bit ad natrum. cows are also man-made, and were bred from aurochs.

I started looking into it some more and there definitely is nutrient loss, but it's rather minimal, and not major. The question is, is it worth risking it for foodborne illness?

Foodborne illness doesn't seem too common, if sourced correctly, but there's always a slim chance.
 

Similar threads

KindMaster1
Replies
10
Views
134
KindMaster1
KindMaster1
meena.psl
Replies
10
Views
741
pulsar23
pulsar23
asdvek
Replies
37
Views
700
ViolentHoneyedNFR
V
Zeekie
Replies
4
Views
332
Zeekie
Zeekie

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top