What kind of features are actually appealing

[Obsid]

For example, what I mean is you can have positive tilted eyebrows, but ideally, I think something appealing would be slightly positively tilted dark low-set eyebrows, and so I want to know specifically what kind of feature is actually appealing; describe it in detail if you want.

 

[Deleted member 99995]

Good facial contrast/colouring is one of the most appealing features imo

 

[Obsid]

Good facial contrast/colouring is one of the most appealing features imo

I've actually never heard of this. I'm going to look into it. Thank you for your response.

 

[lurking truecel]

Having a rather good skull with good jaw angles and good outward gonions with good with, and high set sharp zygos with a projected maxilla. On top of that you can add squared chin and good orbitals. That sounds appealing to me

 

[Obsid]

Having a rather good skull with good jaw angles and good outward gonions with good with, and high set sharp zygos with a projected maxilla. On top of that you can add squared chin and good orbitals. That sounds appealing to me

Sorry for my lack of knowledge, but what differentiates good orbital and bad orbital? I honestly don't understand the orbital bones.

 

[lurking truecel]

Sorry for my lack of knowledge, but what differentiates good orbital and bad orbital? I honestly don't understand the orbital bones.

you want the squared ones in the middle for obv reasons

 

[2chevskuy]

Good facial contrast/colouring is one of the most appealing features imo

sad thing to accept as a khhv aspie coloringcel

 

[Deleted member 99995]

sad thing to accept as a khhv aspie coloringcel

I have bad colouring and still pull giga amounts
Bones carry me

 

[2chevskuy]

I have bad colouring and still pull giga amounts
Bones carry me

im 5'11 17bidelt mtn with ethnic tax my hollow cheeks are meaningless, debloat is cope

 

[Deleted member 99995]

im 5'11 17bidelt mtn with ethnic tax my hollow cheeks are meaningless, debloat is cope

I'm 5'9

 

[2chevskuy]

I'm 5'9

doesnt matter that much imo, all my crushes were stolen by white dudes a lot shorter than me

 

[Mugwump]

heres a list:

-good proportions, meaning high averageness (FWHR, Midface ratio, ES ratio, intercanthal/IPD, chin-philtrum, bizygo:bigonial, chin width/bigonial, mouth width/alar width, etc). You can construct any ratio from taking any set of measurements on the face, and the closest this ratio gets to the average, the better. There are potentially an unlimited number of proportions but I listed the some of the most important, conventional ones. So a chin shouldnt be too short, too long,etc A face not too narrow, not too wide, etc
-Angles close to the average: Facial convexity index, gonial angle, etc. This includes
-Eyebrows should ideally be somewhat thick, wide in length, with good spacing, nicely shaped, positively tilted, dark in color and dense.
- Eye area halos: Long dark eyelashes, long downturned medial canthus of the eye, striking eye color can be a halo but light eyes aren't necessary, good eye shape: which means good PFL-PFH ratio, minimal scleral show, minimal UEE, positive canthal tilt, deep set eyeballs
-Tight skin, high elasticity: which means no sagging around the jawline, midface (nasolabial folds), etc
-The skin should be smooth, clear, with high pheomelanin:eumelanin ratio (a low one gives the skin a dull appearance), not too dark (curry failo) - anything from pale to olive/tanned is ideal
-Lips should be full, with well defined contours, somewhat pouty, with a proper symmetrical seal. Pink in color.
-Leanmaxed to 10-12%, whatever looks best but lean is mandatory
-Angular facial contours - so high set zygos, angular jaw shape
-High set + prominent cheekbones from 3/4 + anterior projection, coupled with vertically compact at least decently projected orbitals
-Facial depth and forward growth of the maxilla - the alveolar process, paranasal, malar complex, cranium, nasal bridge, etc everything should be projected. The amount of projection depends on the race, however. Caucasians have more depth, asians/niggers have flatter faces
-No recession, the chin should be normally projected from the side, and the jaw bone should be well developed

the result should be something like that. Chads and stacies really aint that different in terms of features, the biggest factor which differentiates them is masculine proportions. But the halos/failos system stay consistent btw males and females

 

[Obsid]

heres a list:

-good proportions, meaning high averageness (FWHR, Midface ratio, ES ratio, intercanthal/IPD, chin-philtrum, bizygo:bigonial, chin width/bigonial, mouth width/alar width, etc). You can construct any ratio from taking any set of measurements on the face, and the closest this ratio gets to the average, the better. There are potentially an unlimited number of proportions but I listed the some of the most important, conventional ones. So a chin shouldnt be too short, too long,etc A face not too narrow, not too wide, etc
-Angles close to the average: Facial convexity index, gonial angle, etc. This includes
-Eyebrows should ideally be somewhat thick, wide in length, with good spacing, nicely shaped, positively tilted, dark in color and dense.
- Eye area halos: Long dark eyelashes, long downturned medial canthus of the eye, striking eye color can be a halo but light eyes aren't necessary, good eye shape: which means good PFL-PFH ratio, minimal scleral show, minimal UEE, positive canthal tilt, deep set eyeballs
-Tight skin, high elasticity: which means no sagging around the jawline, midface (nasolabial folds), etc
-The skin should be smooth, clear, with high pheomelanin:eumelanin ratio (a low one gives the skin a dull appearance), not too dark (curry failo) - anything from pale to olive/tanned is ideal
-Lips should be full, with well defined contours, somewhat pouty, with a proper symmetrical seal. Pink in color.
-Leanmaxed to 10-12%, whatever looks best but lean is mandatory
-Angular facial contours - so high set zygos, angular jaw shape
-High set + prominent cheekbones from 3/4 + anterior projection, coupled with vertically compact at least decently projected orbitals
-Facial depth and forward growth of the maxilla - the alveolar process, paranasal, malar complex, cranium, nasal bridge, etc everything should be projected. The amount of projection depends on the race, however. Caucasians have more depth, asians/niggers have flatter faces
-No recession, the chin should be normally projected from the side, and the jaw bone should be well developed


View attachment 3316102View attachment 3316103View attachment 3316106
the result should be something like that. Chads and stacies really aint that different in terms of features, the biggest factor which differentiates them is masculine proportions. But the halos/failos system stay consistent btw males and females

Wow, what a comment. Thank you for your response.