What Makes A Stacy, I'm Right And You Are Wrong

[PlayersGetPlayed]

We org users are highly intellectual sophisticated beings, who have answered most of the toughest questions in the universe. What is a chad? Does height matter? Is face really king? And yet there is one question that remains the center of debate, which is what makes a stacy?

What makes a chad is a very straightforward answer, although some PSL autists would like to disagree. It is as simple as stating that a man with a warrior skull, is a chad. That means low browridge, prominent cheekbones, etc.

And it is because of these features being attractive in men, that some PSL retards have began to wonder, whether warrior skulls are not also the most desirable skullshape for females. I am going to explain to you briefly, why that's not true.

I'm going to explain this as simply as I can, because getting tired here. Back when we still looked like this, our ancestors divided roles between males and females. Men got assigned from birth, the duty to be the protector, the warrior of the patriarchy. This is exactly the warrior skull is an admirable skullshape, no other reason than that. If evolution preferred our men to have weak, recessed skulls, then that would be the ideal male skullshape today.

So that brings us to our final question: what did we look for in girls?

When our ancestors saw a girl, they saw the one who could bear their child. But this didn't mean that men wouldn't prefer female offspring, women were as needed in the household as were men. This is why the argument that girls needed to have masculine features, in order to save their son's masculinity doesn't hold up. Our ancestors needed girls as much as we needed men.

So we now sorted out that women who were attractive probably only possessed the ideal female genes, now we can question what that means. You can see that while most stacies have prominent cheekbones, their eyebrows are high set, and their features in general are softer.

Tldr it's not that deep, girls just need to look pretty and have soft features. This is why I think that Lima is not really the PSL goddess, but rather some girls with more feminine features.

 

[PlayersGetPlayed]

Philosophical bump

 

[PlayersGetPlayed]

Bumpinity

 

[Nowiff.Belgrade]

Ratios and looks theory

To rate a girl to be a PSL goddess wouldn't you ideally use the looks theory built up from the users and info accumulated during PSL?

Doesn't make sense imo

You can just say it's your type

 

[lurking truecel]

A PSL Stacy is just a feminine Chad, soften all features etc. I mean mostly if you use girl filter on chads they will be Stacy, it's the same base

 

[Survivor95]

View attachment 3192243
We org users are highly intellectual sophisticated beings, who have answered most of the toughest questions in the universe. What is a chad? Does height matter? Is face really king? And yet there is one question that remains the center of debate, which is what makes a stacy?

View attachment 3192250
What makes a chad is a very straightforward answer, although some PSL autists would like to disagree. It is as simple as stating that a man with a warrior skull, is a chad. That means low browridge, prominent cheekbones, etc.

And it is because of these features being attractive in men, that some PSL retards have began to wonder, whether warrior skulls are not also the most desirable skullshape for females. I am going to explain to you briefly, why that's not true.

View attachment 3192258
I'm going to explain this as simply as I can, because getting tired here. Back when we still looked like this, our ancestors divided roles between males and females. Men got assigned from birth, the duty to be the protector, the warrior of the patriarchy. This is exactly the warrior skull is an admirable skullshape, no other reason than that. If evolution preferred our men to have weak, recessed skulls, then that would be the ideal male skullshape today.

So that brings us to our final question: what did we look for in girls?

View attachment 3192266
When our ancestors saw a girl, they saw the one who could bear their child. But this didn't mean that men wouldn't prefer female offspring, women were as needed in the household as were men. This is why the argument that girls needed to have masculine features, in order to save their son's masculinity doesn't hold up. Our ancestors needed girls as much as we needed men.

So we now sorted out that women who were attractive probably only possessed the ideal female genes, now we can question what that means. You can see that while most stacies have prominent cheekbones, their eyebrows are high set, and their features in general are softer.

Tldr it's not that deep, girls just need to look pretty and have soft features. This is why I think that Lima is not really the PSL goddess, but rather some girls with more feminine features.

When I am thinking of a stacy, I thinking someone with bones. The angel skull architype. Good feminine proportion. Both chad and stacy have facial leaness and deffined jaw. Body fat fat distribution on hips and breasts is a bonus.

 

[cc_7373]

Good sexual dimorphism with good health indicators

 

[_Tigrim_]

This is why I think that Lima is not really the PSL goddess, but rather some girls with more feminine features.

I agree tbh. Lima is always portrayed as the giga stacy but I've always felt something was off about her but I could never put my finger on it. I thought maybe she's just not my type. I obviously find her attractive but I find quite a lot of other stacies more attractive. For example Jenna Renee who has softer features

 

[Yliaster]

HTB with a curvy Gym Body has always been my standard for Stacy (personally) this is what makes me nut on myself.

As for what makes an actual Stacy its hard to say I think most women's rating become relative at around 7/10 this is usually where a lot of the contention arises because you will have some men think a 7/10 is a Stacy/lite/becky