E
EgoisticHtn
Iron
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2025
- Posts
- 37
- Reputation
- 10
Many people claim MTN is 50% of guys since it's average, many say average guy is LTN, some claim chad is 1 in a million, some every tenth guy, but what is the actual case?
This graph here shows scores of attractiveness on x-axis and a density of population that would be rated like that by women.
First most obvious thing we can see from this graph is that women rate much more brutally becouse 54.5% of the male population is already at 2 (12.5% rated 0, 20% rated 1 and 22.5% rated 2)
Next thing we can notice from this graph (and what is the purpose of this post) is how women see at what percent is each attractiveness score of the male population
SUB3 - 74.5%
LTN - 11%
MTN - 5%
HTN - 1%
CL - 0.02%
Chad - 0.01%
Here is an other example of such shifted ratings:
We can clearly see men rating women very nicely making a almost perfect bell curve, while women rated men so harshly there is 0% of "most attractive" and 27% which is almost 1/3 of the population "least attractive"
Now this probably comes from nature since women need 9 months to make a baby and they are very vulnerable in that period so they became very selective, and generally if women went for "best males" only the whole tribe (civilization) would have better genes.
This graph here shows scores of attractiveness on x-axis and a density of population that would be rated like that by women.
First most obvious thing we can see from this graph is that women rate much more brutally becouse 54.5% of the male population is already at 2 (12.5% rated 0, 20% rated 1 and 22.5% rated 2)
Next thing we can notice from this graph (and what is the purpose of this post) is how women see at what percent is each attractiveness score of the male population
SUB3 - 74.5%
LTN - 11%
MTN - 5%
HTN - 1%
CL - 0.02%
Chad - 0.01%
Here is an other example of such shifted ratings:
We can clearly see men rating women very nicely making a almost perfect bell curve, while women rated men so harshly there is 0% of "most attractive" and 27% which is almost 1/3 of the population "least attractive"
Now this probably comes from nature since women need 9 months to make a baby and they are very vulnerable in that period so they became very selective, and generally if women went for "best males" only the whole tribe (civilization) would have better genes.
