What surgeries actually help buggy eyes

BronzeSpartan2

BronzeSpartan2

Iron
Joined
Sep 4, 2023
Posts
45
Reputation
35
I’ve got a hamza tier eye area i know it’s over for me but i want to try looksmaxx anyway. What surgeries can help with this other than orbital decompression (might consider this at last resort) and supraorbital implants and infras?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5472.jpeg
    IMG_5472.jpeg
    375.9 KB · Views: 137
  • IMG_5474.jpeg
    IMG_5474.jpeg
    220.9 KB · Views: 128
  • IMG_5610.jpeg
    IMG_5610.jpeg
    589 KB · Views: 107
  • IMG_5609.jpeg
    IMG_5609.jpeg
    100.4 KB · Views: 128
I’ve got a hamza tier eye area i know it’s over for me but i want to try looksmaxx anyway. What surgeries can help with this other than orbital decompression (might consider this at last resort) and supraorbital implants and infras?
bonesmash orbitals

how many rupee will it cost to get those implants
 
No surgeries,
Just chin tucks.
 
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: playxiing and pplky
Orbital decompression with infra implant and canthoplasty boom ascenssion🔥
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: playxiing, mightbecooked123, VenatorLuparius and 2 others
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: robert3
Orbital decompression with infra implant and canthoplasty boom ascenssion🔥
Orbital decompression might fuck me over like that frank tufano guy but better to try than being a subhuman. Won’t go to that jew taban tho
 
cantho will def improve but youd need some more obscure shit to fully get rid of the buggy look.
 
Orbital decompression might fuck me over like that frank tufano guy but better to try than being a subhuman. Won’t go to that jew taban tho
No it will not. Tufano's outcome on his OD surgery is extraordinary rare. The surgeon simply shaved too much bones on the medial walls in the orbits. That's why he's cross eyed inward. The eye muscles adapt on the new generated space foremost on the medial wall so it's crucial for the surgeon to only compress in that area as necessary. The lateral wall is much more forgiving regarding shaving the bones without having strabismus afterwards. It can improve your ipd because the lateral decompression will shift your eyes slightly outwards. Most surgeons do first deep lateral orbital decompression and when this is not enough than medial orbital decompression. In your case difficult to say how much decompression you need. Deep Lateral decompression can correct 4-5mm. There are only a few surgeons I would trust to do it. You can DM me if you want.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Acne Victim and mightbecooked123
No it will not. Tufano's outcome on his OD surgery is extraordinary rare. The surgeon simply shaved too much bones on the medial walls in the orbits. That's why he's cross eyed inward. The eye muscles adapt on the new generated space foremost on the medial wall so it's crucial for the surgeon to only compress in that area as necessary. The lateral wall is much more forgiving regarding shaving the bones without having strabismus afterwards. It can improve your ipd because the lateral decompression will shift your eyes slightly outwards. Most surgeons do first deep lateral orbital decompression and when this is not enough than medial orbital decompression. In your case difficult to say how much decompression you need. Deep Lateral decompression can correct 4-5mm. There are only a few surgeons I would trust to do it. You can DM me if you want.
If you watch one of Frank's videos, he admits that Taban expressly advised him not to do it.
I still wouldn't mess with the orbital areas unless there's a compelling reason.
The overall complication rate for orbital decompression is around 10%, which is actually pretty high for a surgery.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Lefor3Laser
If you watch one of Frank's video, he admits that Taban expressly advised him not to do it.
I still wouldn't mess with the orbital areas unless there's a compelling reason.
The overall complication rate for orbital decompression is around 10%, which is actually pretty high for a surgery.
Which part of the video is it and which video he made two
 
Which part of the video is it and which video he made two
I can't remember now. It's the one where he's sitting in front of his house. He made a bunch of update videos for different revision surgeries.
 
I can't remember now. It's the one where he's sitting in front of his house. He made a bunch of update videos for different revision surgeries.
All i can remember is that taban upcharged him and actually recommended another procedure so ru sure taban advised him not to
 
All i can remember is that taban upcharged him and actually recommended another procedure so ru sure taban advised him not to
Yes. I found it. 6:10 of "EYEBALLS UPDATE! 3rd Eye Surgery!?!?". Frank should have signed the NDA and taken the money. There are enough contradictions in his videos alone for any half-competent lawyer to run rings around the guy.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Lefor3Laser
Yes. I found it. 6:10 of "EYEBALLS UPDATE! 3rd Eye Surgery!?!?". Frank should have signed the NDA and taken the money. There are enough contradictions in his videos alone for any lawyer to run rings around the guy.
I’ve just seen it, it’s strange tho if taban advised him not to get the OD how come he uncharged him
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lefor3Laser
If you watch one of Frank's videos, he admits that Taban expressly advised him not to do it.
I still wouldn't mess with the orbital areas unless there's a compelling reason.
The overall complication rate for orbital decompression is around 10%, which is actually pretty high for a surgeryc

If you watch one of Frank's videos, he admits that Taban expressly advised him not to do it.
I still wouldn't mess with the orbital areas unless there's a compelling reason.
The overall complication rate for orbital decompression is around 10%, which is actually pretty high for a surgery.
I disagree, you must look the conversation from Frank with Taban in the right context. Frank foremost said to Taban that he wanted deep set eyes like some male model whatever. Taban responded that he must decompress a lot to achieve his goals and suggested him an alternative surgery plan, because he knew that the orbital decompression will be very aggressive on him to achieve such result. Btw Tufano had bulgy eyes before doing OD and another procedure would have disappointed him because doubtful cosmetic results (of course without the debilitating problems after OD he's facing now). I think that Taban had a bad moment during the surgery. This can happen. Why we fly when every year some of the planes crash? Should we stop flying? I don't want miscredit Frank Tufano he has serious issues after his OD, but they can be fixed. He's not blind. His issue has to do with his eye muscles, his optic nerves are intact that's most important. Would he address to the right person(s) they can fix his strabismus.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Lefor3Laser
I disagree, you must look the conversation from Frank with Taban in the right context. Frank foremost said to Taban that he wanted deep set eyes like some male model whatever. Taban responded that he must decompress a lot to achieve his goals and suggested him an alternative surgery plan, because he knew that the orbital decompression will be very aggressive on him to achieve such result. Btw Tufano had bulgy eyes before doing OD and another procedure would have disappointed him because doubtful cosmetic results (of course without the debilitating problems after OD he's facing now). I think that Taban had a bad moment during the surgery. This can happen. Why we flying when every year some of planes crash? Should we stop flying? I don't want miscredit Frank Tufano he has serious issues after his OD, but they can be fixed. He's not blind. His issue has to do with his eye muscles, his optic nerves are intact that's most important. Would he address to the right person(s) they can fix his strabismus.
Taban advised Frank against undergoing the procedure. I agree that Frank's undoing was of his own making though.
Why we flying when every year some of planes crash? Should we stop flying?
All I said is that a 10% compliance rate is not insignificant. Would you get on a plane i there was a 1 in 10 chance of it crashing? The surgery does come with associated risks to the functionality of the eyes. I recognise that the risk of blindness is infinitesimal but there are other issues, such as misalignment that are significant non-zero likelihood complications.

Frank isn't blind but he needed expensive revision surgeries, not even to get back to his pre-surgery eyesight.

I've never said OP shouldn't do it, just that I personally wouldn't.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Lefor3Laser
Taban advised Frank against undergoing the procedure. I agree that Frank's undoing was of his own making though.

All I said is that a 10% compliance rate is not insignificant. Would you get on a plane i there was a 1 in 10 chance of it crashing? The surgery does come with associated risks to the functionality of the eyes. I recognise that the risk of blindness is infinitesimal but there are other issues, such as misalignment that are significant non-zero likelihood complications.

Frank isn't blind but he needed expensive revision surgeries, not even fully to restore his presurgical eyesight.

I've never said OP shouldn't do it, just that I personally wouldn't.
It's no way 1 in 10..get some proper data. Risk for blindness is around 1 in 100 000 (and only when no surgeon is avaiable to fix the hemorrhage, bleeding, behind the eyeball after the orbital decompression when it happens),. Blindness is virtually excludet when you do the surgery by an expert with a lot of experience because of his technique doing surgery and he will look at you the next day because of this little risk. permanent double vision (strabismus is around 1 in 1000 foremost when the orbital decompression is performed heavily on the medial wall, inward squint like Franks case. this can be fixed in most cases.
 
It's no way 1 in 10..get some proper data. Risk for blindness is around 1 in 100 000 (and only when no surgeon is avaiable to fix the hemorrhage, bleeding, behind the eyeball after the orbital decompression when it happens),. Blindness is virtually excludet when you do the surgery by an expert with a lot of experience because of his technique doing surgery and he will look at you the next day because of this little risk. permanent double vision (strabismus is around 1 in 1000 foremost when the orbital decompression is performed heavily on the medial wall, inward squint like Franks case. this can be fixed in most cases.
If you read my comment, I didn't say 1 in 10 for blindness. I agreed that the risk of blindness is incredibly low.

I was referring to the overall complication rate, which, according to a few studies I've seen, is around 1 in 10, with the most cited issue being strabismus/ eye misalignment.

I know you'll say it can be fixed in revision surgeries but even Frank himself said he isn't back to his pre-surgery eye sight and that's after something like 3 + revisions.

It's a serious surgery with a decent chance of complications. Going into it, people should just be informed and accept there is a distinct, albeit low chance that revision surgeries will be necessary.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Lefor3Laser
If you read my comment, I didn't say 1 in 10 for blindness. I actually said and recognised that it's incredibly low.

I was referring to the the overall complication rate, which, according to a few studies I've seen, is around 1 in 10, with the most cited issue being strabismus/ eye misalignment.

I know you'll say it can be fixed in revision surgeries but even Frank himself said he isn't back to his pre-surgery eye sight and that's after something like 3 + revisions.
I know I know, but your numbers are mixed up, wrong, also regarding strabismus complications after OD. Most patients that have strabism after OD are syndromic patients with grave disease that must decompress from 7mm and above - 15mm. That's why in this patient also the medial wall get decompressed to achieve more decompression and even the orbital floor get sometimes decompressed in this syndromic patients. Decompression of the medial wall alone without doing the compensation of the lateral wall with the same depth (shaving the bones) will almost always lead to inward strabism. This happened to Frank T.
Cosmetic orbital decompression is way less invasive than orbital decompression on syndromic patients because normally only one wall will be decompressed and this is the lateral wall that can give you already a decompression of 4-5mm (without risk of strabism) and no further decompression is needed for good cosmetic result in most cases. As already said Frank Tufano needed only a mild lateral decompression 3-5mm and he would have an excellent result without permanent double vision.

That he did 3 revisions. Without significant improvement is a sign that his doctors don't know how to fix it. His eyes are looking inward ant this is the ROOT cause of his proplems (IMHO) .. he's facing now. They must figure out if he have inward strabism, if yes it's clear as day and night that this is the cause for his vision problems. Strabism surgery can be fixed in almost every case, but it must be real strabism. And the surgeon must be skilled which I doubt they are.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Lefor3Laser
I know I know, but your numbers are mixed up, wrong, also regarding strabismus complications after OD. Most patients that have strabism after OD are syndromic patients with grave disease that must decompress from 7mm and above - 15mm. That's why in this patient also the medial wall get decompressed to achieve more decompression and even the orbital floor get sometimes decompressed in this syndromic patients. Decompression of the medial wall alone without doing the compensation of the lateral wall with the same depth (shaving the bones) will almost always lead to inward strabism. This happened to Frank T.
My mistake. Checked the literature now. You're right. I tried looking for surveys on OD for patients with no chronic conditions but information is very scarce as it's clearly not considered an elective surgery by the mainstream.

For what it's worth, I could find a paper published by Taban. While it noted no permanent cases of diplopia, 2 out of 26 were dissatisfied with the treatment, complaining of sunken eyes. Which is around a 10% dissatisfaction rate - even in Taban's cherry-picked study.

I'd need to research this more. Are there any comprehensive surveys on lateral decompression on normal patients? Especially by a surgeon who doesn't have a vested interest in selling a procedure.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Lefor3Laser
I know I know, but your numbers are mixed up, wrong, also regarding strabismus complications after OD. Most patients that have strabism after OD are syndromic patients with grave disease that must decompress from 7mm and above - 15mm. That's why in this patient also the medial wall get decompressed to achieve more decompression and even the orbital floor get sometimes decompressed in this syndromic patients. Decompression of the medial wall alone without doing the compensation of the lateral wall with the same depth (shaving the bones) will almost always lead to inward strabism. This happened to Frank T.
Cosmetic orbital decompression is way less invasive than orbital decompression on syndromic patients because normally only one wall will be decompressed and this is the lateral wall that can give you already a decompression of 4-5mm (without risk of strabism) and no further decompression is needed for good cosmetic result in most cases. As already said Frank Tufano needed only a mild lateral decompression 3-5mm and he would have an excellent result without permanent double vision.

That he did 3 revisions. Without significant improvement is a sign that his doctors don't know how to fix it. His eyes are looking inward ant this is the ROOT cause of his proplems (IMHO) .. he's facing now. They must figure out if he have inward strabism, if yes it's clear as day and night that this is the cause for his vision problems. Strabism surgery can be fixed in almost every case, but it must be real strabism. And the surgeon must be skilled which I doubt they are.
check dm btw
 
Nothing found.. Send it again.
Do you have any literature/data on efficacy in cosmetic cases out of interest? In Taban's own paper, he states that he doesn't just do lateral decompression alone for most of the cases.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Lefor3Laser
Infras + supras + fat graft

Dont get scammed by Taban and co for orbital decompression unless you wang to end up like Frank Tufano.

I had even worse bug eyes than you 2 years ago and my eyes now look deepset with no uee and no more scleral show.

Supras and infras to lay the foundation and then cantho and fat graft for the finishing.

Don’t be a retard and try to get it all done at the same time.

Get implants then wait a year or so and then get cantho and fat graft.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Lefor3Laser
Infras + supras + fat graft

Dont get scammed by Taban and co for orbital decompression unless you wang to end up like Frank Tufano.

I had even worse bug eyes than you 2 years ago and my eyes now look deepset with no uee and no more scleral show.

Supras and infras to lay the foundation and then cantho and fat graft for the finishing.

Don’t be a retard and try to get it all done at the same time.

Get implants then wait a year or so and then get cantho and fat graft.
do you mind sending pics in dm
 
Do you have any literature/data on efficacy in cosmetic cases out of interest? In Taban's own paper, he states that he doesn't just do lateral decompression alone for most of the cases.
Look if it's cosmetic or syndromal ( grave disease) like the most part of patient are that did OD doesn't matter. The surgery technique is the same with the only two differences that for cosmetic reasons the decompression will normally be much less invasive and no fat will be removed like in the grave disease patients. Taban, Taban... Other surgeons know how decompress in a meaningful manner only shaving the lateral bone. Even when they shave also the medial bone a little it's not that you get cross eyed. It is crucial when shaving the bones lateral and medial to shave it with the right ratio.
 
Infras + supras + fat graft

Dont get scammed by Taban and co for orbital decompression unless you wang to end up like Frank Tufano.

I had even worse bug eyes than you 2 years ago and my eyes now look deepset with no uee and no more scleral show.

Supras and infras to lay the foundation and then cantho and fat graft for the finishing.

Don’t be a retard and try to get it all done at the same time.

Get implants then wait a year or so and then get cantho and fat graft.
Oh, I remember your case. If you don’t mind me asking, did you experience any negative hooding after the supra implant? Also, did the orbital implant become visible like in the image attached below? Do you regret anything about the implants? What do you think about your implant design compared to Giant's? Do you believe conservative movements are better than larger ones?
4270054 1000004184
Images 1
 
No it will not. Tufano's outcome on his OD surgery is extraordinary rare. The surgeon simply shaved too much bones on the medial walls in the orbits. That's why he's cross eyed inward. The eye muscles adapt on the new generated space foremost on the medial wall so it's crucial for the surgeon to only compress in that area as necessary. The lateral wall is much more forgiving regarding shaving the bones without having strabismus afterwards. It can improve your ipd because the lateral decompression will shift your eyes slightly outwards. Most surgeons do first deep lateral orbital decompression and when this is not enough than medial orbital decompression. In your case difficult to say how much decompression you need. Deep Lateral decompression can correct 4-5mm. There are only a few surgeons I would trust to do it. You can DM me if you want.
I wonder how many Ipd difference laterall can do.
I have also noticed that some people have iris placement different but similiar ICD. If its up 2-3mm it might be worth compared to OBO :D. I have 60-61Ipd and midface length of 64 and esr of 0.428 but recovery is stil qutie brutal if get 2mm ipd increase doubt it will change alot. I will probably have ideal esr 0.44+ and mid face ratio 0.95+ . But as it been seen some people with low esr does look cyclops because of midfaceratio >0.90 ,eyebrows and icd. So real impact might be less than actual ratios
1738151782880
 
Last edited:
Look if it's cosmetic or syndromal ( grave disease) like the most part of patient are that did OD doesn't matter. The surgery technique is the same with the only two differences that for cosmetic reasons the decompression will normally be much less invasive and no fat will be removed like in the grave disease patients. Taban, Taban... Other surgeons know how decompress in a meaningful manner only shaving the lateral bone. Even when they shave also the medial bone a little it's not that you get cross eyed. It is crucial when shaving the bones lateral and medial to shave it with the right ratio.
The medical literature on the safety profile for cosmetic cases is pretty scarce. I only used Taban because his paper was literally the only one I could find. You are clearly confident on this point. Fair enough but I personally believe in data for something invasive like this.
 
Oh, I remember your case. If you don’t mind me asking, did you experience any negative hooding after the supra implant? Also, did the orbital implant become visible like in the image attached below? Do you regret anything about the implants? What do you think about your implant design compared to Giant's? Do you believe conservative movements are better than larger ones?
View attachment 3461213View attachment 3461216
No Everything went perfect with the supras, no implant showing no weird stuff.

Can't say the same for the infras but it's due to my base : I had very hollow undereyes before and my cheekbones were alread popping due to the lack of fat in that region. Getting infras made it worse so now I need a fat graft (I needed before the surgery actually).

I did have negative hooding in the first few weeks but it was because of the swelling and it went away as I was recovering.

No regrets whatsover : went from subhuman eye area to above average : no more UEE and buggy eyes, with a PCT.

Keep in mind that we're all different and that the same exact procedure could do wonders for one person but turn out horrendous for the other.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lefor3Laser
No Everything went perfect with the supras, no implant showing no weird stuff.

Can't say the same for the infras but it's due to my base : I had very hollow undereyes before and my cheekbones were alread popping due to the lack of fat in that region. Getting infras made it worse so now I need a fat graft (I needed before the surgery actually).

I did have negative hooding in the first few weeks but it was because of the swelling and it went away as I was recovering.

No regrets whatsover : went from subhuman eye area to above average : no more UEE and buggy eyes, with a PCT.

Keep in mind that we're all different and that the same exact procedure could do wonders for one person but turn out horrendous for the other.
Who was your surgeon?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lefor3Laser
I’ve got a hamza tier eye area i know it’s over for me but i want to try looksmaxx anyway. What surgeries can help with this other than orbital decompression (might consider this at last resort) and supraorbital implants and infras?
My eyes are also buggy. Do orbicularis oculi training 3 sets to failure and keep on raising reps every 2 days
 
No Everything went perfect with the supras, no implant showing no weird stuff.

Can't say the same for the infras but it's due to my base : I had very hollow undereyes before and my cheekbones were alread popping due to the lack of fat in that region. Getting infras made it worse so now I need a fat graft (I needed before the surgery actually).

I did have negative hooding in the first few weeks but it was because of the swelling and it went away as I was recovering.

No regrets whatsover : went from subhuman eye area to above average : no more UEE and buggy eyes, with a PCT.

Keep in mind that we're all different and that the same exact procedure could do wonders for one person but turn out horrendous for the other.
Thank you alot for your response, this means alot for me because i was also thinking to just go with Dr.Pagnoni without Liam designing the implants.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Marelago
No Everything went perfect with the supras, no implant showing no weird stuff.

Can't say the same for the infras but it's due to my base : I had very hollow undereyes before and my cheekbones were alread popping due to the lack of fat in that region. Getting infras made it worse so now I need a fat graft (I needed before the surgery actually).

I did have negative hooding in the first few weeks but it was because of the swelling and it went away as I was recovering.

No regrets whatsover : went from subhuman eye area to above average : no more UEE and buggy eyes, with a PCT.

Keep in mind that we're all different and that the same exact procedure could do wonders for one person but turn out horrendous for the other.
your down slant is still present in your eyes why is that? cantho doesnt work? again u improved alot but the eye area still is average the eyeball itself creates an effect of dropping / hollow because implants don’t change the bone present before you only paste that shit onto it
 
Oh, I remember your case. If you don’t mind me asking, did you experience any negative hooding after the supra implant? Also, did the orbital implant become visible like in the image attached below? Do you regret anything about the implants? What do you think about your implant design compared to Giant's? Do you believe conservative movements are better than larger ones?
View attachment 3461213View attachment 3461216
This looks like shit ngl not sure if its design issue or for some people implants will just look bad
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lefor3Laser
This looks like shit ngl not sure if its design issue or for some people implants will just look bad
I think it's a combinations of 2 things, bad implant placement and big design.

Plus that i think he needed fat graft for them.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ascending birdcel
I think it's a combinations of 2 things, bad implant placement and big design.

Plus that i think he needed fat graft for them.
He was not even that recessed to need implants there imo , jaw implants and a genio would prob ascend him much more i think.
Possibly even bimax if he had bite problems
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lefor3Laser
He was not even that recessed to need implants there imo , jaw implants and a genio would prob ascend him much more i think.
Possibly even bimax if he had bite problems
The idea is that he had trimax, i don't recall on him getting gonion implants though.

I don't find his trimax result pleasing though, lips are still not in line, same for the chin.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ascending birdcel
He was not even that recessed to need implants there imo , jaw implants and a genio would prob ascend him much more i think.
Possibly even bimax if he had bite problems
Screenshot 20250130 130554

This is basically everything on what he got.
 
My eyes are also buggy. Do orbicularis oculi training 3 sets to failure and keep on raising reps every 2 days
Arent these exercises just cope. They won’t make my eyes deeper set, im looking for plastic surgery recommendations mainly
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lefor3Laser
Arent these exercises just cope. They won’t make my eyes deeper set, im looking for plastic surgery recommendations mainly
Get surgery to get almond eyes, not deepest eyes
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Lefor3Laser

Similar threads

FallenCelestial
Replies
2
Views
253
starbuxs
S
D
Replies
40
Views
599
Johanjohan
Johanjohan
Mediterranean
Replies
9
Views
272
AforB
A
Va-qoh
Replies
10
Views
889
UWILLNEVERKNOW8
UWILLNEVERKNOW8

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top