D
Deleted member 16346
Always larping
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2021
- Posts
- 4,569
- Reputation
- 10,454
Everyone loves talking about the gigachad region but this part, the most relevant part to most of us, gets lost in the chico discussion.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Objective beauty doesn’t exist.Also, the sub tries to include racial diversity in the tiers (in order to not get banned, obviously), which is objectively flawed.
Also, the sub tries to include racial diversity in the tiers (in order to not get banned, obviously), which is objectively flawed.
Maybe it does. But we don’t know itObjective beauty doesn’t exist.
Cope.Maybe it does. But we don’t know it
Mackie is tyronelit imo great eyebrows and eye areaAll the guys in the last row except Taylor Caniff are below average. Mackie a bit higher. Dababy is not above average. Sanjay and Yeun have above averagish bones but their hairline fucks them. They should go a tier down. Adam saleh is also overrated.
Could prove it to you. You pretend to know what beauty is. But in the end you have no clue and are just listening to what your gut tells youCope.
It just so happens that there are vast similarities between what peoples' "guts tell them" based on evolution.and are just listening to what your gut tells you
Yeah but saying you van objectively evaluate beauty is wrong. Cuz you can’t. That would mean you could explain why someone is gl. But you can’t. You just listening what your gut tells you. And that is the YOUR opinion. Objective would b if you could measure It up. So it’s not biased. But it is and always will be. Because your gut feeling is different than others.It just so happens that there are vast similarities between what peoples' "guts tell them" based on evolution.
Unless your basing your evaluation on beauty *Yeah but saying you van objectively evaluate beauty is wrong. Cuz you can’t. That would mean you could explain why someone is gl. But you can’t. You just listening what your gut tells you. And that is the YOUR opinion. Objective would b if you could measure It up. So it’s not biased. But it is and always will be. Because your gut feeling is different than others.
So unless you are basing your evaporator beauty completely on measurable and researchable numbers that aren’t just claims you dont have objective beauty
ob·jec·tiveYeah but saying you van objectively evaluate beauty is wrong. Cuz you can’t. That would mean you could explain why someone is gl. But you can’t. You just listening what your gut tells you. And that is the YOUR opinion. Objective would b if you could measure It up. So it’s not biased. But it is and always will be. Because your gut feeling is different than others.
So unless you are basing your evaporator beauty completely on measurable and researchable numbers that aren’t just claims you dont have objective beauty
Yeah but saying you van objectively evaluate beauty is wrong. Cuz you can’t. That would mean you could explain why someone is gl. But you can’t. You just listening what your gut tells you. And that is the YOUR opinion. Objective would b if you could measure It up. So it’s not biased. But it is and always will be. Because your gut feeling is different than others.
So unless you are basing your evaporator beauty completely on measurable and researchable numbers that aren’t just claims you dont have objective beauty
Exactly. You say you are keeping your personal feelings aside means that you can logically prove why x is better as y. But al you can say is „he has better cheekbones“. Ok now tell me why does he have better cheekbones. Show me the research that measured out the ideal cheekbones.ob·jec·tive
adjective
- 1.
(of a person or their judgment) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.
"historians try to be objective and impartial"