What's the difference between LTNs, MTNs and HTNs?

chad_prodigy

chad_prodigy

diagnosed altruist
Joined
Dec 12, 2024
Posts
450
Reputation
669
Also, i see a lot of posts about low mtns, high htns etc. Is this an internal joke or are you ... being serious?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 112944
Also, i see a lot of posts about low mtns, high htns etc. Is this an internal joke or are you ... being serious?
From left to right, kind sir
mrbeast-amazon-prime.jpg
733885_v9_bc.jpg
images
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 112944, first snow, taxidrivermaxxer and 2 others
From left to right, kind sir
mrbeast-amazon-prime.jpg
733885_v9_bc.jpg
images

isn't the point of rating and categorizing looks determining how someone will do with women?

1. if you asked 10 people to classify those 3 subhumans, you'd get 0 consensus, meaning it's just idiotic incel mental masturbation
2. if you didn't know who these guys were, you'd have 0 clue if they were virgins or had a slaycount of 50+

obsessing over categorizing everything is such a prime incel trait
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: MedMogger, just coping, St.TikTokcel and 1 other person
isn't the point of rating and categorizing looks determining how someone will do with women?

1. if you asked 10 people to classify those 3 subhumans, you'd get 0 consensus, meaning it's just idiotic incel mental masturbation
2. if you didn't know who these guys were, you'd have 0 clue if they were virgins or had a slaycount of 50+

obsessing over categorizing everything is such a prime incel trait
0
1734213335801
 
  • JFL
Reactions: MedMogger and just coping
Also, i see a lot of posts about low mtns, high htns etc. Is this an internal joke or are you ... being serious?
I like the David McCall avi
 
Ugly/average/good looking isn't confusing and autistic enough

Judging if someone is deformed or attractive actually takes a lot of skill
 
Ugly/average/good looking isn't confusing and autistic enough

Judging if someone is deformed or attractive actually takes a lot of skill

you know this isn't true. it's just that most users here are either legit braindead or refuse to admit reality is more nuanced than muh you are either a gigachad all women want to fuck or an incel destined to lifelong misery

also, cage at the username
 
  • +1
Reactions: curry apocalypse
Also, i see a lot of posts about low mtns, high htns etc. Is this an internal joke or are you ... being serious?
Ltn:Ugly looking guy
Mtn:Average looking guy
Htn:Attractive looking guy
 
Ltn:Ugly looking guy
Mtn:Average looking guy
Htn:Attractive looking guy

incels here are pushing these classifications way too far (typical incel traits: obsession with categorizing things, black and white thinking, obsession with numbers and pointless statistics)

vast majority of men, looks-wise, are neither straight disgusting nor drop-dead gorgeous. insisting on there being actual, tangible sub-categories beyond that that are not related to preferences, behavior, status, money and other not strictly looks-related traits is just idiotic mental masturbation inspired by years of social isolation

some here are so far gone in this nonsense that they are unironically categorizing those further and describing people or themselves as, i.e., "low mtns", when they'd probably rate gosling as a "mtn" with a "typical psl/incel pheno" if they saw his pics without knowing who he was. fucking cage.
 
LTN = Sexless forever

MTN = Sexless but with the possibility of betabuxxing

HTN = Sex but needs to put effort in it

CL = Sex without effort

Chad = Sex as a hobby
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Gabriel2005, CookieGuy and FutureER
Mr
beast is High LTN low MTN there are better LTN examples like Ed Sheeran
I see mr beast as a very average looking guy there is more pics of him
 
  • +1
Reactions: CookieGuy

Similar threads

MaghrebGator
Replies
7
Views
242
valentine
valentine
basedpheno88
Replies
24
Views
252
KaisenMaxxer
K
lerwaf123
Replies
8
Views
159
lerwaf123
lerwaf123
CookieGuy
Replies
26
Views
636
iblamericky
iblamericky
castizo_ascender
Replies
26
Views
488
yyamann
yyamann

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top