when will people stop coping and admit that we’re animals

[swt]

muhhh my religion says we aren’t adam and eve muhhh

 

[swt]

we’re animals, cut the cope low iq bitch

 

[anthony111553]

we aren't animals

 

[swt]

we aren't animals

shut the FUCK

 

[tom1000]

We think we are special

 

[anthony111553]

shut the FUCK

the concept of "animals" was literally created by humans

 

[Meteor21]

When animals accomplish even 1/10th of what humans have

 

[ThunderPenis4503003]

No your an animal because your mother is a pig so your like a hybrid

 

[anthony111553]

We think we are special

we are special, if you look at the comparative iq between animals we are def superior to the others

 

[TesticularTorsion]

Can animals create high iq threads on .org?

 

[tom1000]

we are special, if you look at the comparative iq between animals we are def superior to the others

Who made those iq charts

 

[tom1000]

we are special, if you look at the comparative iq between animals we are def superior to the others

It’s perspective

 

[averagenormie]

We are not animals we have brains, we can put the strongest wildest scariest predatory animals in cages or even kill them and eat them if we want, we have a higher iq then any other animal

 

[swt]

the concept of "animals" was literally created by humans

your logic is right but if we take it that way it’s safe to say everything isn’t anything because every label was put by us

we could even say we can’t separate ourselves from a dog for example, because the concept of separation was made by us aswell, we could literally just say we’re all one

 

[anthony111553]

Who made those iq charts

no iq test needs, if animals were equal to us they would be a threat to humans controling the earth

 

[swt]

We are not animals we have brains, we can put the strongest wildest scariest predatory animals in cages or even kill them and eat them if we want, we have a higher iq then any other animal

intelligence is a concept made by us, this also falls into the logic of @anthony111553

we’re not more intelligent we simply went our own way as animals, creating things and so on, doesn’t mean more intelligence because truth is that intelligence doesn’t even really exist

 

[swt]

we are special, if you look at the comparative iq between animals we are def superior to the others

iq is also a concept made by humans

 

[tom1000]

no iq test needs, if animals were equal to us they would be a threat to humans controling the earth

It’s perspective to think controlling the earth means most powerful

Some animals do things better than us

+ nature rules us 1 fuck up and we all dead

 

[tom1000]

intelligence is a concept made by us, this also falls into the logic of @anthony111553

we’re not more intelligent we simply went our own way as animals, creating things and so on, doesn’t mean more intelligence because truth is that intelligence doesn’t even really exist

High iq

 

[anthony111553]

It’s perspective to think controlling the earth means most powerful

Some animals do things better than us

+ nature rules us 1 fuck up and we all dead

how is living in the wild better then us? i fail to see the logic. Domesticated dogs all live better with human owners

 

[MyDreamIsToBe183CM]

squishy squishy

 

[liberty]

we are animals with an overly-developed neocortex

 

[tom1000]

how is living in the wild better then us? i fail to see the logic. Domesticated dogs all live better with human owners

It’s all perspective

 

[reptiles]

muhhh my religion says we aren’t adam and eve muhhh

We're not animals were sophisticated biological machines there is a difference your not training a dog to understand abstract thoughts you can train an animal to do that.

Humans are nature's computers animals aren't our next evoutlion is machinery we go from bioelectric to electronic

 

[tom1000]

how is living in the wild better then us? i fail to see the logic. Domesticated dogs all live better with human owners

Animals have a better life than us consciousness makes us suffer

 

[reptiles]

we are animals with an overly-developed neocortex

We are not animals we are bio electric machines very different

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

the concept of "animals" was literally created by humans

And we fit in to that description

 

[anthony111553]

It’s all perspective

multiple species are on the brink of extinction

 

[Mosh12]

The white man is superior to all
As ethnics we are animals tbh

 

[swt]

how is living in the wild better then us? i fail to see the logic. Domesticated dogs all live better with human owners

weak dogs live better with human owners

and weak dogs would’ve been killed in nature the way they’re supposed to, they’d live only to become food for something else

nature kills off the weak, our unnatural system simply protects the weak but it’s not supposed to be this way, simply

it didn’t make anything better it simply kept alive beings that were supposed to die to be food for other beings

——————
and yes, us humans would be better off in the wild ourselves.

 

[liberty]

We are not animals we are bio electric machines very different

the biological definition of "animal" applies to us, so we are...

 

[anthony111553]

And we fit in to that description

other animals don't call others animals

 

[autistic_tendencies]

I am a fucking god hahahahah fuck you champ

 

[averagenormie]

intelligence is a concept made by us, this also falls into the logic of @anthony111553

we’re not more intelligent we simply went our own way as animals, creating things and so on, doesn’t mean more intelligence because truth is that intelligence doesn’t even really exist

How it doesn't exist? Can animals cure themselves? Can they treat diseases? Can they create nuclear weapons? Build skyscrapers? Can they visit other planets? Intelligence is real concept stop with the goatis retarded takes

 

[anthony111553]

weak dogs live better with human owners

and weak dogs would’ve been killed in nature the way they’re supposed to, they’d live only to become food for something else

nature kills off the weak, our unnatural system simply protects the weak but it’s not supposed to be this way, simply

it didn’t make anything better it simply kept alive beings that were supposed to die to be food for other beings

——————
and yes, us humans would be better off in the wild ourselves.

we wouldn't tho, cause people/humans were never satisfied with this lifestyle, hence why humans made the change

 

[reptiles]

the biological definition of "animal" applies to us, so we are...

No because the better term would be a computer our brains are advanced computers simple as that animals are equivalent ti82 our brains are literal super computers.

Biological descriptions are cope if an animal can't do what a human can at there best than humans aren't even in the same category

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

other animals don't call others animals

Not calling other creatures animals is not apart of the requirements to be classified as an animal

 

[anthony111553]

Not calling other animals animals is not apart of the requirements to be classified as an animal

and the classificaions are created by humans

 

[DR. NICKGA]

intelligence is a concept made by us, this also falls into the logic of @anthony111553

we’re not more intelligent we simply went our own way as animals, creating things and so on, doesn’t mean more intelligence because truth is that intelligence doesn’t even really exist

Speak for you own

I am very high iq, but you and yes YOU are very low iq, you are very stupid

Go to africa and be like them animals, alright?

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

and the classificaions are created by humans

And humans fit within the classification

 

[anthony111553]

And humans fit within the classification

yet evolution says we evolved

 

[DR. NICKGA]

how is living in the wild better then us? i fail to see the logic. Domesticated dogs all live better with human owners

Living in the wild is not better at al, its hell
He is very dumb to not know the reality living in the wild

10000 years ago you skull would be bashed against by some enemy, but no worries, you friend is gonna help you defeat him

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

yet evolution says we evolved

Evolution says everything evolved

 

[Latinus]

We're simply more evolved animals.

Yes, we're not like dogs, cats, bugs... which are pure instinct driven, we have a conscience, an ego, but not even them can totally supplant our natural instincts.

 

[liberty]

No because the better term would be a computer our brains are advanced computers simple as that animals are equivalent ti82 our brains are literal super computers.

Biological descriptions are cope if an animal can't do what a human can at there best than humans aren't even in the same category

this is retarded and not how evolutionary trees and taxonomy work

by your logic, we are also not eukaryotes, not multicellular, not living, not mammals and not vertebrates

also, why even call vertebrates animals at all? 95% of all organisms in the animal kingdom are insects, sea sponges, worms, starfish, crustaceans, etc., which are all incomparable to vertebrate, let alone mammalian life, in terms of cognitive abilities

in fact, other mammals possess quite comparable brains to us, when you compare them with what sea sponges or insects have

 

[reptiles]

this is retarded and not how evolutionary trees and taxonomy work

by your logic, we are also not eukaryotes, not multicellular, not living, not mammals and not vertebrates

also, why even call vertebrates animals at all? 95% of all organisms in the animal kingdom are insects, sea sponges, worms, starfish, crustaceans, etc., which are all incomparable to vertebrate, let alone mammalian life, in terms of cognitive abilities

in fact, other mammals possess quite comparable brains to us, when you compare them with what sea sponges or insects have

You're misunderstanding my point. When I say humans are different from animals, I’m not referring to biological classification—I’m talking about cognitive architecture.

Think of it this way: the laws of physics, under the right conditions, lead to life. This process drives complexity, causing atoms to form molecules, which then develop into simple organisms, eukaryotes, organelles, organs, and eventually entire bodies.

At a certain level of complexity, nature's laws push organisms toward algorithmic intelligence. In other words, human intelligence is fundamentally different from

 

[liberty]

You're misunderstanding my point. When I say humans are different from animals, I’m not referring to biological classification—I’m talking about cognitive architecture.

Think of it this way: the laws of physics, under the right conditions, lead to life. This process drives complexity, causing atoms to form molecules, which then develop into simple organisms, eukaryotes, organelles, organs, and eventually entire bodies.

At a certain level of complexity, nature's laws push organisms toward algorithmic intelligence. In other words, human intelligence is fundamentally different from

when you talk about whether humans are animals, you're making a biological statement, so you are referring to biology by definition

having a different type of intelligence doesn't nullify your biological classification, and isnt incompatible with it in any way, just like how mammals are still animals despite being virtually incomparable to invertebrates

the "not animal" definition youre proposing is essentially useless, we are animals for all intents and purposes

but yes, we do have a different type of intelligence, nobody is denying that, its just irrelevant to the taxonomy

 

[reptiles]

when you talk about whether humans are animals, you're making a biological statement, so you are referring to biology by definition

having a different type of intelligence doesn't nullify your biological classification, and isnt incompatible with it in any way, just like how mammals are still animals despite being virtually incomparable to invertebrates

the "not animal" definition youre proposing is essentially useless, we are animals for all intents and purposes

but yes, we do have a different type of intelligence, nobody is denying that, its just irrelevant to the taxonomy

I sort of agree but I would think of humans more as biological computers the reason I would say were different is that I think the ability to think abstractly recursively and the ability to conceptualize things not there all of this I think is the same as a phase transition so when an organism reaches a certain level of complexity they undergo a phase transition to be something completely different.

So while we are all biologically descended from a single common ancestor we aren't that common ancestor any more we are the only species to reach that phase transition and hence we are a completely algorithm

 

[liberty]

I sort of agree but I would think of humans more as biological computers the reason I would say were different is that I think the ability to think abstractly recursively and the ability to conceptualize things not there all of this I think is the same as a phase transition so when an organism reaches a certain level of complexity they undergo a phase transition to be something completely different.

So while we are all biologically descended from a single common ancestor we aren't that common ancestor any more we are the only species to reach that phase transition and hence we are a completely algorithm

i disagree

we might have complex intelligence, but it still serves us for survival, and its still connected to our instincts, drives, emotions, and our animal body

we are not a computer intelligence separated from biology, our intelligence serves our biological needs, not the other way around

 

[reptiles]

i disagree

we might have complex intelligence, but it still servers us for survival, and its still connected to our instincts, drives, emotions, and our animal body

we are not a computer intelligence separated from biology, our intelligence serves our biological needs, not the other way around

Well, it's not just complex intelligence—complexity would imply a more advanced form of intelligence, but humans belong to a separate category. We are the only animals capable of abstract and recursive thought. A chimpanzee is incredibly smart, but its intelligence is specialized for its niche. Human intelligence, on the other hand, isn't—it functions more like a computer or an advanced data-processing algorithm.

Think about it: who do we share more in common with, intelligence-wise—an artificial intelligence or an animal?

I'm also drawing on the ideas of integrated information theory—all life forms are fundamentally computational. There is no real difference between biology and computation; even our bodies are bio electrically powered. However, what I'm saying is that all animals other than humans function like small, specialized algorithms—more like simple circuits rather than full computational systems. Humans, in contrast, represent a phase transition into something entirely more complex and different.

Ultimately, I believe reality itself is a form of biological computational code, and humans are simply following the logical outcome of that programming.