where is the empirical evidence for the claim that Chad is outside more frequently than subhumans?

AspiringMogger

AspiringMogger

Life is what you make it
Joined
Sep 4, 2022
Posts
11,461
Reputation
18,831
I’ve seen this claim float around a lot and it seem to be cemented in blackpill lore. I don’t see any statistics or raw numbers concluding this. In reality it seems as though it intuitively sounds good, but it could also just be basement dweller talk.

The looks level I see in clubs are the exact same I see in universities. There isn’t really anything that points to good looking people being outside more.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 29581 and Bushman
Bro, if you shit on .org members, you wash them
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: AspiringMogger
common sense. why wouldn't you be outside if it's validating? you don't see good looking people more in clubs and other cringe venues like that is because while incel is buying drinks at clubs for becky, chad and stacey are having 3somes with stacey's sister at home. also genuinely chad tier people are much more rare than we think.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 29581, ElTruecel, Deleted member 44486 and 3 others
common sense. why wouldn't you be outside if it's validating? you don't see good looking people more in clubs and other cringe venues like that is because while incel is buying drinks at clubs for becky, chad and stacey are having 3somes with stacey's sister at home. also genuinely chad tier people are much more rare than we think.
“Common sense” is exactly what I’m talking about. You can’t conclude that good looking people are (factually) outside more because of “common sense”. You need empirical evidence and there is non that points to that. Therefore we can’t conclude that ugly people don’t go out just as much good looking people.
 
Holy shit you're dumb negro
You shouldn’t be calling anyone dumb when you’re 28, mildly retarded, and living with your broke dad.
 
You shouldn’t be calling anyone dumb when you’re 28, mildly retarded, and living with your broke dad.
I'm smarter than you, negro. Never try to talk shit about me. I would break your tiny arms irl. You're irrelevant negro
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Akhi
I’ve seen this claim float around a lot and it seem to be cemented in blackpill lore. I don’t see any statistics or raw numbers concluding this. In reality it seems as though it intuitively sounds good, but it could also just be basement dweller talk.

The looks level I see in clubs are the exact same I see in universities. There isn’t really anything that points to good looking people being outside more.
The claim is not that your looks are directly proportional to your level extroversion.

The actual claim is that legit subhumans receive negative reinforcement every time they step out in public and are more likely to be hermits.

There’s a threshold. LTN or higher will suffer no drawbacks by going outside. At LTN or above looks level, your level of extroversion will be heavily dependent on factors and circumstances other than looks.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 29581 and Deleted member 23472
The claim is not that your looks are directly proportional to your level extroversion.

The actual claim is that legit subhumans receive negative reinforcement every time they step out in public and are more likely to be hermits.

There’s a threshold. LTN or higher will suffer no drawbacks by going outside. At LTN or above looks level, your level of extroversion will be heavily dependent on factors and circumstances other than looks.
This all sounds intuitively true, but maybe I’ve been in blackpill spaces too long and I’ve consumed retarded ideas in too large quantities. There is no empirical evidence that points for this to be true. All I’m asking is how do you know?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23472
The claim is not that your looks are directly proportional to your level extroversion.

The actual claim is that legit subhumans receive negative reinforcement every time they step out in public and are more likely to be hermits.

There’s a threshold. LTN or higher will suffer no drawbacks by going outside. At LTN or above looks level, your level of extroversion will be heavily dependent on factors and circumstances other than looks.
nah its all about looks
 
you only need empirical evidence when the conclusion is controversial and there are high stakes involved. the conclusion here is obvious and pretty much inconsequential. you don't need a geeky study to prove it.

i'm sure many chads have used technology to just order girls to their house, but overall, the feeling of being worshipped by people in public is far more intoxicating than the another 3some with sisters. knowing that every single girl you meet in public would pull your pants down and voraciously devour cock within 5 minutes of meeting you is an unparalleled experience. better than sex itself
 
  • +1
Reactions: ElTruecel and Bushman
This all sounds intuitively true, but maybe I’ve been in blackpill spaces too long and I’ve consumed retarded ideas in too large quantities. There is no empirical evidence that points for this to be true. All I’m asking is how do you know?
It’s a trivial claim based on the idea of negative/positive reinforcement.
You can arrive at it with a little bit of basic intuition.

if thought experiments n personal observations aren’t suitable enough proof for you, here is an empirical result
 
Last edited:
  • Love it
Reactions: AspiringMogger
common sense. why wouldn't you be outside if it's validating? you don't see good looking people more in clubs and other cringe venues like that is because while incel is buying drinks at clubs for becky, chad and stacey are having 3somes with stacey's sister at home. also genuinely chad tier people are much more rare than we think.
most of the chads we see that are famous settle down, it's prob not much difference for non famous chads.
 
  • +1
Reactions: seanonigger
People have posted studies that have demonstrated that actually ugly people expect negative results of their social endeavors.
IMG 7497


Absolutely brootal. LTN’s are less likely to have long term relationships.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bushman
Chad is outside 24/7 doing adventurous chit
 

Similar threads

got.daim
Replies
85
Views
3K
turkcelfatcel
turkcelfatcel
CorinthianLOX
Replies
22
Views
1K
irrumator praetor
irrumator praetor
leF
Replies
54
Views
19K
atlantidmogger
atlantidmogger

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top