noonespecial
Gymcel manlet
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2024
- Posts
- 7,400
- Reputation
- 9,214
Let's say he's 5'9
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yeah sadly@noonespecial u have short legs?
my torso is short asfshorter torso mogs
mogger traitmy torso is short asf
howmogger trait
Makes you look high class and important
both men and women are attracted to longer legs, hella studies on this
Makes you look high class and important
yeah but short torso = longer legs?both men and women are attracted to longer legs, hella studies on this
shorter torso = longer legs, just ratio between the twoyeah but short torso = longer legs?
yea this is why (tall goodlooking) long legged men make it in the high fashionMakes you look high class and important
what about long legs long arms and a short torsoshorter torso = longer legs, just ratio between the two
give me a ratio man how long legs vs heightwhat about long legs long arms and a short torso
Most mogger combination there iswhat about long legs long arms and a short torso
lol idk how long my legs are sorrygive me a ratio man how long legs vs height
my legs are 57% of my bodylol idk how long my legs are sorry
there aren't any studies with this outcome in men, only in women.both men and women are attracted to longer legs, hella studies on this
try looking againthere aren't any studies with this outcome in men, only in women.
I know which study you're citing but you didn't read it.try looking again
untrue, high fashion stylists will literally dress u in a way that makes your legs appear longerthat ideal proportions for men are around 1:1
look at ching chong culture (anecdotal) they like 1,90 kpop stars with long legsI know which study you're citing but you didn't read it.
almost every study that exists indicates that ideal proportions for men are around 1:1
they repeated the same experiment in japan and it yielded the same results: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-015-0635-9look at ching chong culture (anecdotal) they like 1,90 kpop stars with long legs
Btw look at botb submission thread pls
high fashion models don't appeal to normal people.untrue, high fashion stylists will literally dress u in a way that makes your legs appear longer
Makes sense tbh bcs averageness mogs as an attractiveness indicatorthey repeated the same experiment in japan and it yielded the same results: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-015-0635-9
it's also been performed on american women https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5990728/ and also brittish women but I don't have that one saved.
excessive deviations from 1:1 were seen as indicative of disease
high fashion models don't appeal to normal people.
there's studies that show that 'longer than average' legs in raw size is also ideal but this means nothing on paper as you can still have 1:1 proportions with above average legs if your torso is comparatively long.Makes sense tbh bcs averageness mogs as an attractiveness indicator
Dont have to be a model to hire a stylist from therehigh fashion models don't appeal to normal people.
This one, from Cambridge University? Although it was performed on Americansalso brittish women but I don't have that one saved.
Dont have to be a model to hire a stylist from there
This one, from Cambridge University? Although it was performed on Americans
https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/83aaf8fb-81ce-40c3-9bae-b5163c2e06c7/download
"Leg-to-body ratio (LBR) predicts evolutionary fitness, and is
therefore expected to influence bodily attractiveness. Previous
investigations of LBR attractiveness have used a wide variety
of stimuli, including line drawings, silhouettes, and computergenerated images based on anthropometric data. In two studies, community samples of heterosexual women from the USA rated the attractiveness of male figures presented as silhouettes and as detailed computer-generated images with three different skin tones (white, black, and an artificial grey). The effects of LBR depended on the image format. In particular, a curve-fitting analysis indicated that the optimally-attractive LBR for silhouettes was fractionally below the baseline,whereas the optima for more detailed computer-generated images was approximately 0.5 s.d. above the baseline and was similar for all three skin-tones. In addition, the participants’s ensitivity to changes in the LBR was lowest for the silhouettesa nd highest for the grey figures. Our results add to evidencet hat the most attractive LBR is close to, but slightly above,the population mean, and caution that the effects of limb proportions on attractiveness depend on the ecological validity
of the figures."
Summary:
The study concludes that an ideal leg-to-body ratio for attractiveness is typically slightly above average, but the perception of this ratio is influenced by factors like image detail and skin tone. This further supports the idea that evolutionary fitness signals, like LBR, influence attractiveness, although the context and realism of the image matter significantly in determining this perception.
; the black figures received lower ratings than all other formats
yeah yeah niggeralmost every study that exists indicates that ideal proportions for men are around 1:1
Hahaahahaalmost spat out my food.
im making a case argument for 50-55% nothing more than that btwView attachment 3292796
the results of that study are around 1:1, 0.5 is negligible and you can't tell the difference in reality.
proportionally no, because you can wear lifts, you can't artificially extend your spine.yeah yeah nigger
one thing for sure tho, 10x better to have long legs than short legs
50-55% i mean if we split ur body in a 100% between ur legs and torsoHahaahaha
im making a case argument for 50-55% nothing more than that btw
not just legs with a small torso slammed on them, just legs a bit longer
niggers gonna be wearing lifts indoors and at the beach mirin tbhproportionally no, because you can wear lifts, you can't artificially extend your spine.
it looks like the same thing in real life, I'd argue no one can tell the difference between 45-55 in motion.Hahaahaha
im making a case argument for 50-55% nothing more than that btw
not just legs with a small torso slammed on them, just legs a bit longer
women do this why can't I.niggers gonna be wearing lifts indoors and at the beach mirin tbh
there's studies that say using umbrellas is associated with lower brain cancer possibilities, associations in studies, especially association studies are iffyit looks like the same thing in real life, I'd argue no one can tell the difference between 45-55 in motion.
the study you cited also states that: Conversely, excessively long legs are associated with harmful genetic diseases, such as Marfan syndrome[29,30].
Small torso is a low t bad genetic trait. And you can't even lengthen your legs when you have it. I don't anderstand why most people's vote for itLet's say he's 5'9
Long legs is associated with high E2, and is a good evolutionary trait for girls, and a bad one for males.it looks like the same thing in real life, I'd argue no one can tell the difference between 45-55 in motion.
the study you cited also states that: Conversely, excessively long legs are associated with harmful genetic diseases, such as Marfan syndrome[29,30].
models are dressed to make products stand out, jeans/pants are one of the main products they market, it doesn't mean that's attractive.
women do this why can't I.
View attachment 3292819
Looks more aesthetic?Small torso is a low t bad genetic trait. And you can't even lengthen your legs when you have it. I don't anderstand why most people's vote for it
Not in my opinion, and i don't think girls careLooks more aesthetic?