Brandon10
Master
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2019
- Posts
- 1,740
- Reputation
- 3,239
inb4 dnrd
SOURCE : http://uglyliberals.blogspot.com/2018/01/identifying-white-male-liberals-and-why.html
Identifying White Male Liberals and why they are always ugly(r-Selection, Epigenetics, and Physiognomy)
1. Introduction
Search online for pictures of White male liberals and you will probably see images of short men with elongated rodent-like mid-faces, facial a-symmetry, negative canthal tilts, lack of browridge, recessed midface, weak frames, sickly pallor, and a receding hairline at a younger age than average. This is because liberalism is in fact something that exists at the core of someones being rather than as a result of influence. This is why they all share the same physiognomic facial deformations that give them away.
The reason for this is exposure to high levels of cortisol, either through the mother prenatally (mother was highly stressed while pregnant), or postnatally through trauma or bullying in childhood... mother had post-partum depression, personality disorder, drank alcohol, was a 'helicopter parent', they have aspergers (which resulted in bullying), developmental trauma disorder, hysteroid dysphoria, maternal attunement disruption, rejection-sensitive dysphoria, proximal separation, etc. Cortisol reduces testosterone, raises estrogen, and being exposed to excessive cortisol, low testosterone, and high estrogen levels prenatally or in their juvenile years when their brains are highly neuroplastic and their faces and bodies are developing would be very damaging. Cortisol destroys phenotypes ("moon facies"), has deleterious effects on the body (Cushing's syndrome, immune suppression, muscle and bone weakness, hair loss, etc.), and hard-wires pathways between the hippocampus and amygdala in a way that increases anxiety (See also: how trauma affects our genes (epigenetics)).
Scientifically, the liberal political affiliation is linked to the dopamine receptor D4 (liberal gene) and the D4 genotype is affected by prenatal stress exposure as well as bad childhood parenting. DRD4 is also linked to schizophrenia, bipolar disease, anorexia, eating disorders, infidelity as well as obsessive compulsive disorder, anger, and self-harm. Stress levels have been rising over time and this could be why there are so many liberals today (especially among millennials). Homosexuals are also affected by this (cortisol and childhood sexual abuse is what creates homosexuals).
2. Liberal Taxonomy
The facial width-to-height (fWHR) ratio of liberals is very low (I.E. they have long horse/bird/rat-like mid-faces). Cortisol obliterates testosterone in the body and it is one reason for liberals having a low fWHR. fWHR is based on the amount of prenatal and pubertal testosterone that you were exposed to. fWHR is the one physical metric that is directly correlated with testosterone levels. fWHR is more correlated with testosterone than muscles, height, masculinity, and any other physical measure. fWHR literally = testosterone. A high fWHR is correlated with Perceived Aggression, Dominance, Masculinity [2] [8], Sports Performance [3] [7], CEOs Financial Performance [4], Handgrip Strength [5], Aggression [6], Fighting Success [7], Sexual Attraction, STR [8], Testosterone Levels [9].
Goodlooking people all have a high fWHR, as well as, a neutral or slightly positive canthal tilt, never negative. Canthal tilts are also affected by pubertal testosterone exposure [10]. Canthal tilts have not been directly correlated to liberalism as fWHR has been in studies, but it is something that I have noticed empirically.
*Note: The canthal tilt, as well, as lateral canthus (upper-outer corner of eye-lid) droops because of the bone resorption that happens with aging and because of a lifetime of gravity pulling down on a persons face, so an analysis of older people is not always reliable (the same logic may apply to the fWHR of older people as well).
www.psychologicalscience.org
Facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) and circulating testosterone levels in men:
Canthal tilts and prenatal/pubertal hormonal exposure:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
A person with a negative canthal tilt and low fWHR is guaranteed to be ugly!
Negative Canthal Tilt:
Positive Canthal Tilt:
Here is someone who combines a low fWHR with a negative canthal tilt (stereotypical "Jew look")
White liberal (note the negative canthal tilt, long midface, lack of symmetry, weak/recessed features, non-existent glabella or browridge, sclera show and retruded orbitals/horrible zygo growth causing frog eyes).
Left-Wing Women Vs. Right-Wing Women: http://archive.is/YxLNw/64a0ab12b9ab3fba2d8ac92a4241feea3ac7f87c.jpg
Anti-Trump protesters: https://web.archive.org/web/2016111...e0636206fde2828c2f5696b1a8379993f26ccd6cf.jpg
Hillary Clinton supporters:
Bernie Sanders supporters:
Open Borders Activists: http://www.breitbart.com/london/201...st-dismantling-of-calais-jungle-migrant-camp/
Watch this video and notice how nearly all the Liberals have low fWHR, negative canthal tilt, and lack of a browridge while the Conservatives have a high fWHR and neutral or positive canthal tilts.
Cupid's bow
The cupid's bow is a facial feature where the double curve of a human upper lip is said to resemble the bow of Cupid. The cupids bow is much more defined in those with high cortisol.
Note the "fish mouth syndrome".
3. Digit Ratio
This is the same as fWHR. Those exposed to more prenatal testosterone have a longer ring finger (4th digit) in comparison to their index finger (2nd digit).
phys.org
"What we found was that 2D:4D ratio can predict face attractiveness. The more masculine the 2D:4D is, the more attractive is the face,"
4. Other traits of those lacking significant prenatal testosterone exposure
These people are not just ugly but they are less successful and less intelligent than attractive people who have a high fWHR + positive canthal tilt.
Successful CEO's have high mid-face ratios: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/foru...re-predicts-their-firms-financial-performance,
Intelligent people have a high mid-face ratio and are more racist than average, they just suppress it better: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ly-racists-difference-likely-act-beliefs.html
And they're weaker: Men who are physically strong are more likely to have right wing political views (weaker men more likely to support welfare state and wealth redistribution): http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/a...strong-likely-right-wing-political-views.html
They also earn less: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/609065
5. Prevention & Looking Forward
Is it possible for parents to prevent having ugly liberal children? Possibly. If they are the result of epigenetic/environmental factors, especially cortisol, then logically you would want to make sure that your wife is non stressed, non depressed, and an emotionally available parent. A stress-free pregnancy and a stress-free childhood environment combined with prenatal measures and birth spacing, could potentially prevent parents from procreating and raising a subhuman. Also, consider supplementing testosterone cream like androgel (or Indonesian Tongkat Ali in 50:1 extract or 100:1 extract if you cannot get a prescription) while pregnant because the amount of testosterone the fetus is exposed to in the womb will determine their testosterone “set-points” as an adult.
6. Conclusion
The modern Liberal/Progressive is the result of prenatal/pubertal cortisol exposure. The good news is that through self-selection these subhumans will eventually be bred out of the gene pool. Despite liberal propaganda, Women only care about the genetic quality of a man judged by his face, not how progressive or cool he thinks he is, and because of birth control, on demand abortions, woman's higher earning level and e-dating sites/apps where they judge a mans genetic value within a split-second, they hold all the power as to who they will procreate with. Then throw in involuntary celibacy of the vast majority of "progressive" men and this makes the process irreversible. But with state intervention we can breed these subhumans out of the population within two generations through deliberate selection and it would all be done voluntarily because women despise weak or genetically inferior men, also, despite media brainwashing, their biggest fear (including leftists) is having an ugly, weak, or gay son. A man carries 50% of their mothers mitochondrial DNA and a goodlooking, strong, and healthy son will spread his mothers genes very effectively. The promise of having attractive sons will alone drive women toward prenatal screening and epigenetics.
SOURCE : http://uglyliberals.blogspot.com/2018/01/identifying-white-male-liberals-and-why.html
Identifying White Male Liberals and why they are always ugly(r-Selection, Epigenetics, and Physiognomy)
1. Introduction
Search online for pictures of White male liberals and you will probably see images of short men with elongated rodent-like mid-faces, facial a-symmetry, negative canthal tilts, lack of browridge, recessed midface, weak frames, sickly pallor, and a receding hairline at a younger age than average. This is because liberalism is in fact something that exists at the core of someones being rather than as a result of influence. This is why they all share the same physiognomic facial deformations that give them away.
The reason for this is exposure to high levels of cortisol, either through the mother prenatally (mother was highly stressed while pregnant), or postnatally through trauma or bullying in childhood... mother had post-partum depression, personality disorder, drank alcohol, was a 'helicopter parent', they have aspergers (which resulted in bullying), developmental trauma disorder, hysteroid dysphoria, maternal attunement disruption, rejection-sensitive dysphoria, proximal separation, etc. Cortisol reduces testosterone, raises estrogen, and being exposed to excessive cortisol, low testosterone, and high estrogen levels prenatally or in their juvenile years when their brains are highly neuroplastic and their faces and bodies are developing would be very damaging. Cortisol destroys phenotypes ("moon facies"), has deleterious effects on the body (Cushing's syndrome, immune suppression, muscle and bone weakness, hair loss, etc.), and hard-wires pathways between the hippocampus and amygdala in a way that increases anxiety (See also: how trauma affects our genes (epigenetics)).
Scientifically, the liberal political affiliation is linked to the dopamine receptor D4 (liberal gene) and the D4 genotype is affected by prenatal stress exposure as well as bad childhood parenting. DRD4 is also linked to schizophrenia, bipolar disease, anorexia, eating disorders, infidelity as well as obsessive compulsive disorder, anger, and self-harm. Stress levels have been rising over time and this could be why there are so many liberals today (especially among millennials). Homosexuals are also affected by this (cortisol and childhood sexual abuse is what creates homosexuals).
2. Liberal Taxonomy
The facial width-to-height (fWHR) ratio of liberals is very low (I.E. they have long horse/bird/rat-like mid-faces). Cortisol obliterates testosterone in the body and it is one reason for liberals having a low fWHR. fWHR is based on the amount of prenatal and pubertal testosterone that you were exposed to. fWHR is the one physical metric that is directly correlated with testosterone levels. fWHR is more correlated with testosterone than muscles, height, masculinity, and any other physical measure. fWHR literally = testosterone. A high fWHR is correlated with Perceived Aggression, Dominance, Masculinity [2] [8], Sports Performance [3] [7], CEOs Financial Performance [4], Handgrip Strength [5], Aggression [6], Fighting Success [7], Sexual Attraction, STR [8], Testosterone Levels [9].
Goodlooking people all have a high fWHR, as well as, a neutral or slightly positive canthal tilt, never negative. Canthal tilts are also affected by pubertal testosterone exposure [10]. Canthal tilts have not been directly correlated to liberalism as fWHR has been in studies, but it is something that I have noticed empirically.
*Note: The canthal tilt, as well, as lateral canthus (upper-outer corner of eye-lid) droops because of the bone resorption that happens with aging and because of a lifetime of gravity pulling down on a persons face, so an analysis of older people is not always reliable (the same logic may apply to the fWHR of older people as well).
Facial Structure May Predict Endorsement of Racial Prejudice
The structure of a man’s face may indicate his tendency to express racially prejudiced beliefs, according to new research published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.Studies have shown that facial …
Facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) and circulating testosterone levels in men:
Canthal tilts and prenatal/pubertal hormonal exposure:
Second to fourth digit ratio and face shape
The average human male face differs from the average female face in size and shape of the jaws, cheek-bones, lips, eyes and nose. It is possible that this dimorphism is determined by sex steroids such as testosterone (T) and oestrogen (E), and several ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
A person with a negative canthal tilt and low fWHR is guaranteed to be ugly!
Negative Canthal Tilt:
Positive Canthal Tilt:
Here is someone who combines a low fWHR with a negative canthal tilt (stereotypical "Jew look")
White liberal (note the negative canthal tilt, long midface, lack of symmetry, weak/recessed features, non-existent glabella or browridge, sclera show and retruded orbitals/horrible zygo growth causing frog eyes).
Left-Wing Women Vs. Right-Wing Women: http://archive.is/YxLNw/64a0ab12b9ab3fba2d8ac92a4241feea3ac7f87c.jpg
Anti-Trump protesters: https://web.archive.org/web/2016111...e0636206fde2828c2f5696b1a8379993f26ccd6cf.jpg
Hillary Clinton supporters:
Bernie Sanders supporters:
Open Borders Activists: http://www.breitbart.com/london/201...st-dismantling-of-calais-jungle-migrant-camp/
Watch this video and notice how nearly all the Liberals have low fWHR, negative canthal tilt, and lack of a browridge while the Conservatives have a high fWHR and neutral or positive canthal tilts.
Cupid's bow
The cupid's bow is a facial feature where the double curve of a human upper lip is said to resemble the bow of Cupid. The cupids bow is much more defined in those with high cortisol.
Note the "fish mouth syndrome".
3. Digit Ratio
This is the same as fWHR. Those exposed to more prenatal testosterone have a longer ring finger (4th digit) in comparison to their index finger (2nd digit).
Distance running may be an evolutionary 'signal' for desirable male genes
Pre-birth exposure to high levels of the male sex hormone testosterone has already been shown to confer evolutionary advantages for men: strength of sex drive, sperm count, cardiovascular efficiency and spatial awareness, for example.
"What we found was that 2D:4D ratio can predict face attractiveness. The more masculine the 2D:4D is, the more attractive is the face,"
Long ring fingers are attached to good-looking guys, study shows
If you want to know how attractive a guy is, look down … at his hands, that is. The ratio between the length of his right index and ring fingers is linked to facial attractiveness, a new study finds.
www.nbcnews.com
4. Other traits of those lacking significant prenatal testosterone exposure
These people are not just ugly but they are less successful and less intelligent than attractive people who have a high fWHR + positive canthal tilt.
Successful CEO's have high mid-face ratios: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/foru...re-predicts-their-firms-financial-performance,
Intelligent people have a high mid-face ratio and are more racist than average, they just suppress it better: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ly-racists-difference-likely-act-beliefs.html
And they're weaker: Men who are physically strong are more likely to have right wing political views (weaker men more likely to support welfare state and wealth redistribution): http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/a...strong-likely-right-wing-political-views.html
They also earn less: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/609065
5. Prevention & Looking Forward
Is it possible for parents to prevent having ugly liberal children? Possibly. If they are the result of epigenetic/environmental factors, especially cortisol, then logically you would want to make sure that your wife is non stressed, non depressed, and an emotionally available parent. A stress-free pregnancy and a stress-free childhood environment combined with prenatal measures and birth spacing, could potentially prevent parents from procreating and raising a subhuman. Also, consider supplementing testosterone cream like androgel (or Indonesian Tongkat Ali in 50:1 extract or 100:1 extract if you cannot get a prescription) while pregnant because the amount of testosterone the fetus is exposed to in the womb will determine their testosterone “set-points” as an adult.
6. Conclusion
The modern Liberal/Progressive is the result of prenatal/pubertal cortisol exposure. The good news is that through self-selection these subhumans will eventually be bred out of the gene pool. Despite liberal propaganda, Women only care about the genetic quality of a man judged by his face, not how progressive or cool he thinks he is, and because of birth control, on demand abortions, woman's higher earning level and e-dating sites/apps where they judge a mans genetic value within a split-second, they hold all the power as to who they will procreate with. Then throw in involuntary celibacy of the vast majority of "progressive" men and this makes the process irreversible. But with state intervention we can breed these subhumans out of the population within two generations through deliberate selection and it would all be done voluntarily because women despise weak or genetically inferior men, also, despite media brainwashing, their biggest fear (including leftists) is having an ugly, weak, or gay son. A man carries 50% of their mothers mitochondrial DNA and a goodlooking, strong, and healthy son will spread his mothers genes very effectively. The promise of having attractive sons will alone drive women toward prenatal screening and epigenetics.
