
heightisthetruth
Subhuman Cumskin Shall Ascend
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2025
- Posts
- 1,644
- Reputation
- 1,343
Section 1:
Listen up retards, studies have straight-up shown that white men don’t even have the highest sexual market value (SMV), especially when you look beyond just online dating. Yeah, online dating stats get hyped up, but they’re kinda warped when it comes to real-life hookups and sexual desirability. (Most of it is based on message frequency not race itself.)
For example, the Latino man and white woman pairing is actually the most common interracial hookup combo out there more than Asian women with white men or black men with white women. And when it comes to interracial hookups overall, black men are the most wanted. They top the charts for interracial sexual access, with Latino men right behind them. These two groups have way higher hookup rates across racial lines than white guys.
Now, the thing is, online dating apps can mess with how people see this stuff. Now lets say white men did get a lot of matches with Asian or Latina women online, which I want to emphasise is false. Relies on just surface-level, algorithm driven data. Now moving on, when you dig into actual hookup rates and real-world sexual activity, the picture flips. Black and Latino men actually have way more interracial sexual partners and higher hookup rates, showing their SMV in the real world is much stronger than what those dating apps suggest.
Section 2
WMAF is declining:
1. Recent Census marriage data shows a decline in Asian female White male marriages compared to the 1990s.
OXFORD STUDY:
The Oxford/OKCupid study gets thrown around like it’s the gospel here, but let’s be real it’s mad outdated and full of holes. First off, it’s just swipe data like, who people message on a dating app, not who they actually sleep with or date long-term. That’s not “preference,” that’s “who looked good in one selfie.” Plus, this was during a time when Asian dudes had zero media rep and every show had some old White dude with an Asian girl no wonder people internalized that for a bit. But times changed. Asian men are out here kpopmaxxing , and to be frank gooks aren’t stuck on the “colonial-era fantasy” anymore. Real life ain’t just dating app stats, and boiling down a whole race’s dating behavior to some 2010s app data? That’s just cope.
Section 3
It’s time you accept it, white brahs even the gooks you love so much are starting to see that you guys aren’t shit. And it wasn’t because you were more attractive on average (JFL MOST RECESSED PEOPLE ARE EUROPEANS) it’s the fact media and colonialism shifted this idea that getting with a white man was some sort of high status. But the world has changed people hook up more now, people are getting married less. In truth, ethnic men do it better. That’s why blackbrahs and tacobrahs are fucking your future wives.
“Muh Marriage Rates.” Doesn’t mean shit when you are being married to Pedros and Tyrones leftovers.
Listen up retards, studies have straight-up shown that white men don’t even have the highest sexual market value (SMV), especially when you look beyond just online dating. Yeah, online dating stats get hyped up, but they’re kinda warped when it comes to real-life hookups and sexual desirability. (Most of it is based on message frequency not race itself.)
For example, the Latino man and white woman pairing is actually the most common interracial hookup combo out there more than Asian women with white men or black men with white women. And when it comes to interracial hookups overall, black men are the most wanted. They top the charts for interracial sexual access, with Latino men right behind them. These two groups have way higher hookup rates across racial lines than white guys.
Now, the thing is, online dating apps can mess with how people see this stuff. Now lets say white men did get a lot of matches with Asian or Latina women online, which I want to emphasise is false. Relies on just surface-level, algorithm driven data. Now moving on, when you dig into actual hookup rates and real-world sexual activity, the picture flips. Black and Latino men actually have way more interracial sexual partners and higher hookup rates, showing their SMV in the real world is much stronger than what those dating apps suggest.
Section 2
WMAF is declining:
1. Recent Census marriage data shows a decline in Asian female White male marriages compared to the 1990s.
OXFORD STUDY:
The Oxford/OKCupid study gets thrown around like it’s the gospel here, but let’s be real it’s mad outdated and full of holes. First off, it’s just swipe data like, who people message on a dating app, not who they actually sleep with or date long-term. That’s not “preference,” that’s “who looked good in one selfie.” Plus, this was during a time when Asian dudes had zero media rep and every show had some old White dude with an Asian girl no wonder people internalized that for a bit. But times changed. Asian men are out here kpopmaxxing , and to be frank gooks aren’t stuck on the “colonial-era fantasy” anymore. Real life ain’t just dating app stats, and boiling down a whole race’s dating behavior to some 2010s app data? That’s just cope.
Section 3
It’s time you accept it, white brahs even the gooks you love so much are starting to see that you guys aren’t shit. And it wasn’t because you were more attractive on average (JFL MOST RECESSED PEOPLE ARE EUROPEANS) it’s the fact media and colonialism shifted this idea that getting with a white man was some sort of high status. But the world has changed people hook up more now, people are getting married less. In truth, ethnic men do it better. That’s why blackbrahs and tacobrahs are fucking your future wives.
“Muh Marriage Rates.” Doesn’t mean shit when you are being married to Pedros and Tyrones leftovers.
Attachments
-
IMG_9873.jpeg375.7 KB · Views: 0
-
IMG_9871.jpeg195.6 KB · Views: 0
-
IMG_9868.jpeg130.6 KB · Views: 0
-
IMG_9867.jpeg261.8 KB · Views: 0
-
IMG_9861.jpeg362.5 KB · Views: 0
-
IMG_9860.webp18.5 KB · Views: 0
-
IMG_9859.jpeg733.8 KB · Views: 0
-
IMG_9858.jpeg539 KB · Views: 0
-
IMG_9870.jpeg158.5 KB · Views: 0
-
IMG_9869.jpeg339.8 KB · Views: 0
-
IMG_9865.webp52 KB · Views: 0
-
IMG_9864.jpeg160.8 KB · Views: 0
-
IMG_9863.jpeg503.3 KB · Views: 0
Last edited: