White supermacys is based on a number of logical fallacies.

[Deleted member 13642]

White supremacy is a new phenomena the british scholars had realised that eastern civlisations were superior to British and European civilisation up until the 1800s. Many European countries that were under control by the Ottomans were complete shithole and were plagued by famines, it was only due to europe never being unified like other eastern nations for example India under the mughals and chadruguptas and china under the tang dynasty that technology was able to advance especially military technology.

Even the atzecs who had their simplistic primative way of life were commented by the British to be free of deformities. They way a civilisation grows is based on where its proximity is.

 

[Deleted member 2632]

Damn bruh thats crazy

Now tell all your Jew friends and Non-Whites to get out of the " White inferior " countries and go back to your " superior nations "

Thanks

 

[Enfant terrible]

 

[Deleted member 12827]

Holy shit not a fucking molecule kys

 

[turkproducer]

White supremacy is a new phenomena

agreed

the british scholars had realised that eastern civlisations were superior to British and European civilisation up until the 1800s.

dubious, what is an "eastern" civilisation? greece used to be considered to be in the middle east by the way, and everyone knows that western europe TODAY wouldn't be the same without southern eastern med societies, and some other ethnic contributions

Many European countries that were under control by the Ottomans were complete shithole and were plagued by famines,

They were mostly background side countries and never amounted that much innovation

it was only due to europe never being unified like other eastern nations for example India under the mughals and chadruguptas and china under the tang dynasty that technology was able to advance especially military technology.

idk what u mean by that

Even the atzecs who had their simplistic primative way of life were commented by the British to be free of deformities.

not sure what u mean

They way a civilisation grows is based on where its proximity is.

true, some cultures and societies never had to adapt and innovate since their environment did not force them to

 

[Deleted member 13642]

Damn bruh thats crazy

Now tell all your Jew friends and Non-Whites to get out of the " White inferior " countries and go back to your " superior nations "

Thanks

You either have low iq or didnt read what I said. And read my other reply. Most modern technology is innovated by china, India and Israel respectively. And we jews control the anglosphere and whites as were indistuigishble to each other in looks. And I like controlling white nations.

 

[Deleted member 13642]

agreed


dubious, what is an "eastern" civilisation? greece used to be considered to be in the middle east by the way, and everyone knows that western europe TODAY wouldn't be the same without southern eastern med societies, and some other ethnic contributions


They were mostly background side countries and never amounted that much innovation

idk what u mean by that

not sure what u mean

true, some cultures and societies never had to adapt and innovate since their environment did not force them to

>what is eastern civilisation
we might as well consider every non Germanic civilisation as non white as white supremacists like to differentiate themselves from southern Europeans, like to consider greeks as non whites. But the cultural similarities between greeks and Europeans are there. Countries being united means less military innovation, to destroy each other, when india was united under Mughal and chadrugputa rule, there is no real need to for arms race because they under one rule. White supremacys is stupid because they are being controlled by the Jews hence jewish supremacy is probably more accurate or anglo-jewish supremacy.

 

[sandcelmuttcel]

agreed


dubious, what is an "eastern" civilisation? greece used to be considered to be in the middle east by the way, and everyone knows that western europe TODAY wouldn't be the same without southern eastern med societies, and some other ethnic contributions


They were mostly background side countries and never amounted that much innovation

idk what u mean by that

not sure what u mean

true, some cultures and societies never had to adapt and innovate since their environment did not force them to

They were mostly background side countries and never amounted that much innovation
cough cough Greece

 

[turkproducer]

They were mostly background side countries and never amounted that much innovation
cough cough Greece

arent you a greek jfl

 

[Deleted member 2632]

You either have low iq or didnt read what I said. And read my other reply. Most modern technology is innovated by china, India and Israel respectively. And we jews control the anglosphere and whites as were indistuigishble to each other in looks. And I like controlling white nations.

When it was announced that Henry Kissinger was to be awarded the Peace Prize, two of the Norwegian Nobel Committee members resigned in protest.

There goes your fucking Nobel Prize argument the whole Nobel prize system is Jew fuckery

Also Israel has to constantly spy on the US and steal military technology and uranium from us

" Muh big brain Jews " constantly stealing White ideas and shekels

Whites invent everything and Jews steal it and pretend they came up with

Jonathan Pollard - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Apollo affair - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Heres a list of what Jews actually invented:

Feminism, Communism, Central Banking/Fractional Reserve System, Multi-Culturism, and Transgenderism

 

[sandcelmuttcel]

arent you a greek jfl

yes so

 

[turkproducer]

yes so

most greeks are proud of their inventions 2000 years ago

 

[Vitruvian]

tribalism is cope. its u vs the world these days

 

[sandcelmuttcel]

i tried reading your essay multiple times and my iq dropped each time reading it
you contradict yourself

 

[sandcelmuttcel]

most greeks are proud of their inventions 2000 years ago

yeah
where you are getting at

 

[turkproducer]

yeah
where you are getting at

They were mostly background side countries and never amounted that much innovation
cough cough Greece

sarcasm?

 

[sandcelmuttcel]

sarcasm?

no
have you realized the greek inventions did not stop 2000 years ago?

 

[Deleted member 13642]

When it was announced that Henry Kissinger was to be awarded the Peace Prize, two of the Norwegian Nobel Committee members resigned in protest.

There goes your fucking Nobel Prize argument the whole Nobel prize system is Jew fuckery

Also Israel has to constantly spy on the US and steal military technology and uranium from us

" Muh big brain Jews " constantly stealing White ideas and shekels

Whites invent everything and Jews steal it and pretend they came up with

Jonathan Pollard - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Apollo affair - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Heres a list of what Jews actually invented:

Feminism, Communism, Central Banking/Fractional Reserve System, Multi-Culturism, and Transgenderism

The nobel peace prize has nothing to do with nobel prizes in chemistry, economics, science, and literature etc

You know you are grabbing for straws when your only argument is stealing military technology. And do you know who runs the USA? The rich Jewish elites who control you. Chinese + jews > whites

List of Israeli inventions and discoveries - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Deleted member 2632]

The nobel peace prize has nothing to do with nobel prizes in chemistry, economics, science, and literature etc

You know you are grabbing for straws when your only argument is stealing military technology. And do you know who runs the USA? The rich Jewish elites who control you. Chinese + jews > whites

List of Israeli inventions and discoveries - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Jews do control the USA but not because of IQ but because they have unlimited funds from the Rothschild baking family, they can bribe everybody, also Jews work together

Jews IQ alone is not enough to run the world, its their ability to work together, because they are parasites they have no national loyalty to any nation and so Globalism comes naturally to them

The Chinese are not so superior considering they fell to Communism, which Jews pushed onto them, realtively easy and never were able to shake Communism off where as Eastern Europeans did, also Germany fought off the Communists

And the Chinese dont have the excuse that Jews look similar to them ( hard to spot a Jew in Germany vs in China )

 

[Deleted member 13642]

The Jews do control the USA but not because of IQ but because they have unlimited funds from the Rothschild baking family, they can bribe everybody, also Jews work together

Jews IQ alone is not enough to run the world, its their ability to work together, because they are parasites they have no national loyalty to any nation and so Globalism comes naturally to them

The Chinese are not so superior considering they fell to Communism, which Jews pushed onto them, realtively easy and never were able to shake Communism off where as Eastern Europeans did, also Germany fought off the Communists

And the Chinese dont have the excuse that Jews look similar to them ( hard to spot a Jew in Germany vs in China )

No its generally the jewish iq and ingenuity that we rule over whites, white European culture is dead that's why whites are inferior and are ruled by the Jewish elite.

 

[Deleted member 5189]

You either have low iq or didnt read what I said. And read my other reply. Most modern technology is innovated by china, India and Israel respectively. And we jews control the anglosphere and whites as were indistuigishble to each other in looks. And I like controlling white nations.

Lol you talk about it as if you're not as much of a slave to the elite Jews as we are. You're not part of the club. You went to school, wageslave, pay taxes just like any other person does jfl. They don't give a shit about you or the average Jew.

There's only a very small amount of Jews who are actually intelligent and have a ton of power over the world and the others are only in high positions because of nepotism. Jews have been outcast since the dawn of time until the last 100 years and the only reason their parasitic nature is succeeding now is because of their power in the media. Once they've lost that it's over. They haven't won yet.

 

[TITUS]

Another mentally ill jew greycel spaming nonsense.

 

[Deleted member 10913]

Many European countries that were under control by the Ottomans were complete shithole and were plagued by famines

Jfl any example to back up this claim? Or is it some b.s. you came up with

 

[Deleted member 13642]

Jfl any example to back up this claim? Or is it some b.s. you came up with

literally just look at eastern europe , complete shitholes

 

[Deleted member 6305]

not even the whole title

 

[Deleted member 6305]

literally just look at eastern europe , complete shitholes

So you're implying that africans are inferior just because they're poor?

 

[BrendioEEE]

You either have low iq or didnt read what I said. And read my other reply. Most modern technology is innovated by china, India and Israel respectively. And we jews control the anglosphere and whites as were indistuigishble to each other in looks. And I like controlling white nations.

"Invented by a Jew" is codeword for "Stolen from the Goyim"

 

[Deleted member 13642]

Another mentally ill jew greycel spaming nonsense.

refute my claim then retard

 

[Deleted member 13642]

"Invented by a Jew" is codeword for "Stolen from the Goyim"

when a non white invents something WN always find some way to claim it, same with the Chinese inventing stuff

 

[BrendioEEE]

when a non white invents something WN always find some way to claim it, same with the Chinese inventing stuff

Woah look at these amazing chinese inventions....I kneel....wow...how can white boys even compete?

 

[Deleted member 13642]

View attachment 1101999
Woah look at these amazing chinese inventions....I kneel....wow...how can white boys even compete?
View attachment 1102000

So the chinese inventing laser guns, building deep dive vr, and genetic engineering while the Americans protests some nigga lol

 

[Deleted member 10913]

They were mostly background side countries and never amounted that much innovation

Hungary for example was an Empire who was on the rise. This was by no mean a sidelined country who was easy in taking over. It needed tremendous amount of skill. There was also a time we occupied Poland.

literally just look at eastern europe , complete shitholes

Yea right now after years of communist idiocracy. You need to show an example in the Ottoman era to make an argument like this

 

[BrendioEEE]

So the chinese inventing laser guns, building deep dive vr, and genetic engineering while the Americans protests some nigga lol

Stolen western tech + west is doing it better and did it first, unfortunately they're doing it better for the Jews though.

 

[FastBananaCEO]

Damn bruh thats crazy

Now tell all your Jew friends and Non-Whites to get out of the " White inferior " countries and go back to your " superior nations "

Thanks

this

 

[Deleted member 7029]

back to reddit

 

[Deleted member 13642]

Stolen tech + west is doing it better, unfortunately they're doing it better for the Jews though.

Proof its stolen tech? becasue thats cia propoganda. Furthermore, less and less white people are entering stem, its a new phenomena that was predicted where whites would be second class in their own societies new to subversion of the jews. Just look at the UK more indian and Chinese students in university then white. The Chinese and other east aisans are giga high iq and will make genetically engineered super zhanngs with 190 iq

 

[Deleted member 13642]

back to reddit

They dont allow jb lovers like my self

 

[BrendioEEE]

Proof its stolen tech? becasue thats cia propoganda.

China would have been on par with the west technologically before trade routes were as opened as they were today if it wasn't.

Furthermore, less and less white people are entering stem, its a new phenomena that was predicted where whites would be second class in their own societies new to subversion of the jews. Just look at the UK more indian and Chinese students in university then white.

Chinese IQ really isn't that great compared to Korea and Japan, they're pretty subhuman, India is even worse, they have high memory though, they're more like robots who can monkey see, monkey do, because they have no soul that's why they have no actual inventions to their name because of a lack of creativity, unlike their more east asian counterparts (Korea + Japan) and Europe.

Indians and Chinese in Uni are slaves to the Jewish stolen tech industry + occassionally the chinese stolen tech industry rather than actual innovators, that's usually kept to the few Shabbos Goy left to have their inventions and innovations stolen.

The Chinese and other east aisans are giga high iq and will make genetically engineered super zhanngs with 190 iq

They're definitely going to need genetically engineering if they want to become human, same goes for the Jews, although, I doubt they'll want to become anything other than demons.

 

[Deleted member 9217]

View attachment 1101999
Woah look at these amazing chinese inventions....I kneel....wow...how can white boys even compete?
View attachment 1102000

U forgot gunpowder, the compass, paper and the printing press

 

[Deleted member 13642]

China would have been on par with the west technologically before trade routes were as opened as they were today if it wasn't.

Chinese IQ really isn't that great compared to Korea and Japan, they're pretty subhuman, India is even worse, they have high memory though, they're more like robots who can monkey see, monkey do, because they have no soul that's why they have no actual inventions to their name because of a lack of creativity, unlike their more east asian counterparts (Korea + Japan) and Europe.

Indians and Chinese in Uni are slaves to the Jewish stolen tech industry + occassionally the chinese stolen tech industry rather than actual innovators, that's usually kept to the few Shabbos Goy left to have their inventions and innovations stolen.

They're definitely going to need genetically engineering if they want to become human, same goes for the Jews, although, I doubt they'll want to become anything other than demons.

Indians and chinese actually have pretty high iq. I know for a fact indians and Chinese dominate the biochemistry fields.

These 10 Important Technological Inventions Were Made By Indians

A list of technological inventions made by Indians

www.gizbot.com

Srs, indians are pretty high iq especially the upper caste and people with well nutrition as nutrition and iq is linked, i have seen studies on indians who live in developed area and their iq is higher especially in upper castes. The are plenty of curry ceo's, and innovators they dominate nasa, and many ceos in tech companies such as google and Microsoft are run by indians.

List of Indian inventions and discoveries - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Fibre optics and the usb were invented by indians as well. So im pretty sure with proper nurtition they can do fine, and the indians were quite rich as a civilisation at points in history. And you provided 0 proof that the chinese stole tech, they are naturally as smart as koreans and japanaese as they are the same race you just hate them because they are competing with western nations are fucking them over.

 

[BrendioEEE]

U forgot gunpowder, the compass, paper and the printing press

Chinese alchemists seem to have discovered nitrates during the Sung dynasty, perhaps around AD 900, as a white, crystalline powder that cooled water when dissolved in it, and deflagrated vigorously when thrown on a fire. It was this last property that was new and exciting. Nitrates came to Europe as Chinese snow through trade routes as an alchemical curiosity. The first Arabic reference to saltpetre dates from 1225. It is mentioned by the Iberian Al-Baytar in 1248 as "snow of China.

The Chinese, and others, surely possessed such mixtures as soon as saltpetre became available. The fire lance was probably the next step. This was a bamboo tube several feet long, drilled through the joints and wrapped with strong twine to keep it from bursting, and attached to a long heft with which to hold and aim it. It was loaded with a deflagrating powder and various projectiles, in fact much like a kind of Roman candle. It was lighted from a fuze projecting from the muzzle, whereupon it would discharge its fire, gases, and projectiles to the front. Turned around so it discharged to the rear, it made a rocket, stabilised by a stick behind it, and perhaps with an iron point on the front. Weapons of this type were used in China by the 13th century, and spread through the Mongols and Tatars to the Arabs and to India, around 1250.

The Chinese had firecrackers for a very long time, but they contained no gunpowder. They were simply pieces of green bamboo that would crack loudly when thrown into a fire, and thereby scare away evil spirits. Before, saltpetre when confined in a strong paper tube the size of a finger joint, would make a terrifying loud bang, and these new firecrackers were very effective against evil spirits. Roger Bacon already knew about this in 1257, and described it in Epistolae de Secretis Operibus of that date as a device to make noise like thunder and a flash like lightning, giving an anagrammatic recipe for the powder. The invention proceeded no further in China, beyond incendiaries, fire lances, and firecrackers. European gunpowder and cannon were reintroduced to China under the Ming dynasty by the Portuguese and others.

The place and time of the invention of the cannon is unknown, but its evolution from the fire lance among the Turks, Arabs and Europeans can hardly be doubted. In 1304, Edward I made no use of cannon at Stirling but by 1341 the castle was defended by the Scots with guns. The English fortress of La Réole in Gascony fell after a month's bombardment by cannon in 1324. Guns are reported at Crécy in 1346, but in a minor role. The Venetians are said to have used cannon for a siege in 1380, as did Alfonso XI about the same time against the Moors in Spain. Poudre à canon is recorded in 1338.

In fact, cannon were probably invented either in Italy or in Saxony, or in both places, around 1300, and Berthold reflects the Saxon claim. It seems probable that cannon, and the proper gunpowder to use as a propellent, were invented in Europe. The first representation of a cannon in an illustration dates from 1326.

The name cannon comes from the essential part, the cylindrical bore or barrel, probably through the Latin canna, for a reed, with the Italian augmentative suffix -one, making cannone, and joining the vernacular in the 14th century. Indeed, the earliest Chinese and Arabic firearms used bamboo tubes, cannae, as barrels, and shot arrows. The word canon was used in Latin for a gun (1326 in Italy, 1418 in England), but this is just a Latinized cannone, assimilated to an existing Latin word.

Some writers have even suggested that gunpowder, in the restricted sense, reached China from the West. Indeed, the first cannon in China were introduced by Jesuits in 1520, and the Japanese say fireworks were introduced to their country by the Dutch around 1600, at the port of Sakai, near Osaka. Gunpowder could not have been introduced to Europe by the Chinese, because gunpowder did not then exist. However, the Chinese did make a very valuable and ingenious contribution in the form of nitrates.

The compass was literally not invented for the purpose of navigation in China, it was used for some divination nonsense, they had no idea of it's true purpose when they accidentally created it.

Most scholars credit at present the invention of the compass to China. The first mention of the magnetic attraction of a needle is to be found in a Chinese work composed between 20 and 100 AD. The earliest recorded actual use of a magnetized needle for navigational purposes is in AD 1117.

The true mariner's compass used a pivoting needle in a dry box, and was invented in Europe no later than 1300.

Often the allegation is heard that paper was invented in China or Egypt. In neither of these two civilizations was paper used: in China a textile based parchment was used, and in Egypt bound reeds - papyrus - was made into parchment. The very earliest documents in Europe were also captured on material parchment - but there is no evidence that this development was transmitted from the East to Europe.

In Europe, the process to make a textile thin enough to be comfortably used, meant a laborious process of pulping thicker scraps of textiles by hand. This process was revolutionized in 1798 by the French scientist Nicholas Louis Robert, who invented the first mechanical paper pulping machine. The raw material was still crude textile. Robert's machine was improved by the British stationers and brothers Henry Fourdrinier and Sealy Fourdrinier, who in 1803, produced the first of the machines that bear their name.

Only in 1840, was the process of producing paper from ground wood developed in Europe, and the idea of adding chemicals only took place in 1850, creating the modern paper making process which has lasted to this day.

In 1850, the German Friedrich Gottlob Keller devised the first method of making paper from wood pulp. In 1852, the Englishman Hugh Burgess, improved upon the process by mixing the wood pulp with chemicals, and in 1867, the American chemist C.B. Tilghman, started adding sulfites during the pulping process. Finally, as late as 1879, the Swede C.F. Dahl, perfected the use of wood by adding yet another chemical.

Paper is thus purely an European invention, despite popular belief to the contrary.

As with paper, the allegation is often heard that printing was invented in China. This is also untrue: in China a simple system of pattern inking had been developed in which a strip of material was lain against a water based painted picture. This only worked for very basic patterns and was consequently was not widespread. There is also no evidence that this technique was ever exported anywhere as it had virtually no applications.

In Europe, printing was developed entirely independently after long thought on how to speed up the process of book copying: Johann Gutenberg, of the German city of Mainz, invented the technical aspects of printing in 1450. Basing the design of his machine on a wine press, Gutenburg developed the use of raised and movable type and from the start used oil based paints.

The invention of the printing press revolutionized the spread of knowledge: a printing press was built in Venice in 1469, and the city had 417 printers by 1500. In 1476, a printing press was developed in England by William Caxton; in 1539, the Spaniard Juan Pablos set up an imported press in Mexico City, Mexico. Stephen Day built the first printing press in North America at Massachusetts Bay in 1628, and helped establish the Cambridge Press.

By the end of the 1400's, 1,000 new books were being published per year by Europe's book printers. By 1815, the number had climbed to 20,000 per year.

The Non-white world's wealthiest city, Constantinople, under the Ottoman Turks, did not acquire its first printing press until the year 1726, and by 1815, the grand total of all the books published in Constantinople in the preceding 89 years, was only 63 titles.

 

[Deleted member 13642]

Chinese alchemists seem to have discovered nitrates during the Sung dynasty, perhaps around AD 900, as a white, crystalline powder that cooled water when dissolved in it, and deflagrated vigorously when thrown on a fire. It was this last property that was new and exciting. Nitrates came to Europe as Chinese snow through trade routes as an alchemical curiosity. The first Arabic reference to saltpetre dates from 1225. It is mentioned by the Iberian Al-Baytar in 1248 as "snow of China.

The Chinese, and others, surely possessed such mixtures as soon as saltpetre became available. The fire lance was probably the next step. This was a bamboo tube several feet long, drilled through the joints and wrapped with strong twine to keep it from bursting, and attached to a long heft with which to hold and aim it. It was loaded with a deflagrating powder and various projectiles, in fact much like a kind of Roman candle. It was lighted from a fuze projecting from the muzzle, whereupon it would discharge its fire, gases, and projectiles to the front. Turned around so it discharged to the rear, it made a rocket, stabilised by a stick behind it, and perhaps with an iron point on the front. Weapons of this type were used in China by the 13th century, and spread through the Mongols and Tatars to the Arabs and to India, around 1250.

The Chinese had firecrackers for a very long time, but they contained no gunpowder. They were simply pieces of green bamboo that would crack loudly when thrown into a fire, and thereby scare away evil spirits. Before, saltpetre when confined in a strong paper tube the size of a finger joint, would make a terrifying loud bang, and these new firecrackers were very effective against evil spirits. Roger Bacon already knew about this in 1257, and described it in Epistolae de Secretis Operibus of that date as a device to make noise like thunder and a flash like lightning, giving an anagrammatic recipe for the powder. The invention proceeded no further in China, beyond incendiaries, fire lances, and firecrackers. European gunpowder and cannon were reintroduced to China under the Ming dynasty by the Portuguese and others.

The place and time of the invention of the cannon is unknown, but its evolution from the fire lance among the Turks, Arabs and Europeans can hardly be doubted. In 1304, Edward I made no use of cannon at Stirling but by 1341 the castle was defended by the Scots with guns. The English fortress of La Réole in Gascony fell after a month's bombardment by cannon in 1324. Guns are reported at Crécy in 1346, but in a minor role. The Venetians are said to have used cannon for a siege in 1380, as did Alfonso XI about the same time against the Moors in Spain. Poudre à canon is recorded in 1338.

In fact, cannon were probably invented either in Italy or in Saxony, or in both places, around 1300, and Berthold reflects the Saxon claim. It seems probable that cannon, and the proper gunpowder to use as a propellent, were invented in Europe. The first representation of a cannon in an illustration dates from 1326.

The name cannon comes from the essential part, the cylindrical bore or barrel, probably through the Latin canna, for a reed, with the Italian augmentative suffix -one, making cannone, and joining the vernacular in the 14th century. Indeed, the earliest Chinese and Arabic firearms used bamboo tubes, cannae, as barrels, and shot arrows. The word canon was used in Latin for a gun (1326 in Italy, 1418 in England), but this is just a Latinized cannone, assimilated to an existing Latin word.

Some writers have even suggested that gunpowder, in the restricted sense, reached China from the West. Indeed, the first cannon in China were introduced by Jesuits in 1520, and the Japanese say fireworks were introduced to their country by the Dutch around 1600, at the port of Sakai, near Osaka. Gunpowder could not have been introduced to Europe by the Chinese, because gunpowder did not then exist. However, the Chinese did make a very valuable and ingenious contribution in the form of nitrates.

The compass was literally not invented for the purpose of navigation in China, it was used for some divination nonsense, they had no idea of it's true purpose when they accidentally created it.

Most scholars credit at present the invention of the compass to China. The first mention of the magnetic attraction of a needle is to be found in a Chinese work composed between 20 and 100 AD. The earliest recorded actual use of a magnetized needle for navigational purposes is in AD 1117.

The true mariner's compass used a pivoting needle in a dry box, and was invented in Europe no later than 1300.

Often the allegation is heard that paper was invented in China or Egypt. In neither of these two civilizations was paper used: in China a textile based parchment was used, and in Egypt bound reeds - papyrus - was made into parchment. The very earliest documents in Europe were also captured on material parchment - but there is no evidence that this development was transmitted from the East to Europe.

In Europe, the process to make a textile thin enough to be comfortably used, meant a laborious process of pulping thicker scraps of textiles by hand. This process was revolutionized in 1798 by the French scientist Nicholas Louis Robert, who invented the first mechanical paper pulping machine. The raw material was still crude textile. Robert's machine was improved by the British stationers and brothers Henry Fourdrinier and Sealy Fourdrinier, who in 1803, produced the first of the machines that bear their name.

Only in 1840, was the process of producing paper from ground wood developed in Europe, and the idea of adding chemicals only took place in 1850, creating the modern paper making process which has lasted to this day.

In 1850, the German Friedrich Gottlob Keller devised the first method of making paper from wood pulp. In 1852, the Englishman Hugh Burgess, improved upon the process by mixing the wood pulp with chemicals, and in 1867, the American chemist C.B. Tilghman, started adding sulfites during the pulping process. Finally, as late as 1879, the Swede C.F. Dahl, perfected the use of wood by adding yet another chemical.

Paper is thus purely an European invention, despite popular belief to the contrary.

As with paper, the allegation is often heard that printing was invented in China. This is also untrue: in China a simple system of pattern inking had been developed in which a strip of material was lain against a water based painted picture. This only worked for very basic patterns and was consequently was not widespread. There is also no evidence that this technique was ever exported anywhere as it had virtually no applications.

In Europe, printing was developed entirely independently after long thought on how to speed up the process of book copying: Johann Gutenberg, of the German city of Mainz, invented the technical aspects of printing in 1450. Basing the design of his machine on a wine press, Gutenburg developed the use of raised and movable type and from the start used oil based paints.

The invention of the printing press revolutionized the spread of knowledge: a printing press was built in Venice in 1469, and the city had 417 printers by 1500. In 1476, a printing press was developed in England by William Caxton; in 1539, the Spaniard Juan Pablos set up an imported press in Mexico City, Mexico. Stephen Day built the first printing press in North America at Massachusetts Bay in 1628, and helped establish the Cambridge Press.

By the end of the 1400's, 1,000 new books were being published per year by Europe's book printers. By 1815, the number had climbed to 20,000 per year.

The Non-white world's wealthiest city, Constantinople, under the Ottoman Turks, did not acquire its first printing press until the year 1726, and by 1815, the grand total of all the books published in Constantinople in the preceding 89 years, was only 63 titles.

Yes they used it as a fire works but it doesn't take a genius to realise that this can be used as a weapon, thus the Chinese used gun powder as an arms, hell when marco polo when to china he brought back the first Chinese hand gun. But europeans rewrite their history a lot anyway. But whatever it is the Chinese, and non europeans were more advanced then europeans prior to the industrial revolution

 

[BrendioEEE]

Indians and chinese actually have pretty high iq.

Cope

I know for a fact indians and Chinese dominate the biochemistry fields.

Because if whites did Jews would lose.

These 10 Important Technological Inventions Were Made By Indians

A list of technological inventions made by Indians

www.gizbot.com

Consdering like 4 or 5 of these was not invented by an Indian i'm just gonna go out on a limb and assume the ones that I am not entirely sure about probably weren't invented by an Indian either, since that utterly discredits the entire article.

Srs, indians are pretty high iq especially the upper caste and people with well nutrition as nutrition and iq is linked, i have seen studies on indians who live in developed area and their iq is higher especially in upper castes. The are plenty of curry ceo's, and innovators they dominate nasa, and many ceos in tech companies such as google and Microsoft are run by indians.

List of Indian inventions and discoveries - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

All shabbos goy under their Jewish overlords.

And you provided 0 proof that the chinese stole tech, they are naturally as smart as koreans and japanaese as they are the same race you just hate them because they are competing with western nations are fucking them over.

Evolutionary biology and past actions is proof enough, aswell as the long list of inventions Europeans have made, including several of which have been falsely accredited to ethnics.

 

[Deleted member 13642]

Cope

Because if whites did Jews would lose.

Consdering like 4 or 5 of these was not invented by an Indian i'm just gonna go out on a limb and assume the ones that I am not entirely sure about probably weren't invented by an Indian either, since that utterly discredits the entire article.

All shabbos goy under their Jewish overlords.

Evolutionary biology and past actions is proof enough, aswell as the long list of inventions Europeans have made, including several of which have been falsely accredited to ethnics.

China ranked very high in iq.
>because if whites did jews would lose

cope because whites have already loss to rampant degeneracy and racemixing. Im guessing your some sort of loser neet who hasn't even gotten into stem because of ur low iq.


>muh jewish overlords
Jewish media hates hindus, and actively tries to shame hindu nationlism etc

>Evolutionary biology and past actions is proof enough, aswell as the long list of inventions Europeans have made, including several of which have been falsely accredited to ethnics.

yes and evolutionary biology points to east aisans being smarter then europeans.

Email VA Shiva Ayyadurai is an American scientist of Indian origin, inventor and entrepreneur. As a high school student in 1979, he developed an electronic version of an interoffice mail system, which he called "EMAIL" and copyrighted in 1982.


Radio In 1895, Sir J. C. Bose gave his first public demonstration of electromagnetic waves, Sir J. C. Bose invented the Mercury Coherer (together with the telephone receiver) used by Guglielmo Marconi to receive the radio signal in his first transatlantic radio communication in December 1901. Sir J. C. Bose holds the first patent worldwide to invent a solid-state diode detector to detect EM waves. The detector was built using a galena crystal. Bose has been credited belatedly for his achievement.


Intel Pentium Chip The world famous and most widely used chip in computers, the Intel Pentium Chip was invented by Vinod Dham. He is also called the 'Father of Pentium Chip'.

USB The USB is a part of our daily lives. This tiny, data storage gadget was co-invented by an Indian-American computer architect Ajay Bhatt. But he didn't make any money out of it and he is okay with that. According to a report from Business Insider Ajay said that he didn't do it for money, instead he did this to bring about a change. And according to him, not very often people get a chance to bring about this big a change

Dr. Narinder Singh Kapany is named as one of the 7 ‘Unsung Heroes' by Fortune Magazine and is widely recognized as the ‘Father of Fiber Optics' for his pioneering work in Fiber Optics technology.

Rocket Missiles It was India, and it was none other than Tipu Sultan, the ruler of Mysore and his father Hyder Ali that first used the iron-cased and metal-cylinder rockets against the British East India Company in 1780.

Economic history of India - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Hell India wealth mogged europeans

 

[Deleted member 7580]

You either have low iq or didnt read what I said. And read my other reply. Most modern technology is innovated by china, India and Israel respectively. And we jews control the anglosphere and whites as were indistuigishble to each other in looks. And I like controlling white nations.

You’re a Jew ? Lol I thought you were Indian

 

[Deleted member 13642]

You’re a Jew ? Lol I thought you were Indian

im actually a mutt i just identifiy as any race since i have European, curry, asciatic turk central aisan and Jewish ancestry from my DNA tests

 

[BrendioEEE]

China ranked very high in iq.

Because China has no reason to lie right?

>because if whites did jews would lose
cope because whites have already loss to rampant degeneracy and racemixing. Im guessing your some sort of loser neet who hasn't even gotten into stem because of ur low iq.

I got into a prestigious university on scholarships alone as a poor white dude in L.A, if you know anything about how they select for non whites and women for scholarships, you'd know how hard that is, and was double majoring in Evolutionary Biology (My primary major), and Psychology (absolutely shit marxist class, but needed to do both to be qualified as an evolutionary psychologist, which isn't an actual field you can major in). I got expelled though, shit was marxist and corrupt anyways. Stem has been entirely infiltrated, even shit you would find mundane and not political, like engineering.

Debunked

>muh jewish overlords
Jewish media hates hindus, and actively tries to shame hindu nationlism etc

They hate everyone who isn't Jewish, yet they'll still use lesser races to destroy whites because whites are far more of a threat than any other race, even when whites are down bad.

>Evolutionary biology and past actions is proof enough, aswell as the long list of inventions Europeans have made, including several of which have been falsely accredited to ethnics.
yes and evolutionary biology points to east aisans being smarter then europeans.

Maybe Koreans and Japs, but definitely not Chinese, if you look at their genetics aswell, Chinese are absolute mongrels compared to Koreans and Japanese, truly subhuman nowadays. Maybe ancient Chinese were more pure before the mongols invaded and they got absolutely genetically assblasted into pure subhumans.

Even Koreans and Japs have some genetic faults compared to Europeans with their testosterone and estrogen levels highly limiting creativity, which is why Japs who probably have the most genetic potential in East Asia, only rose to high prominence after extensive western influence.

Indians larping as the creators of white inventions

Not even worth going over, at the moment.

India has always been an absolute shithole

 

[Deleted member 13642]

Because China has no reason to lie right?

I got into a prestigious university on scholarships alone as a poor white dude in L.A, if you know anything about how they select for non whites and women for scholarships, you'd know how hard that is, and was double majoring in Evolutionary Biology (My primary major), and Psychology (absolutely shit marxist class, but needed to do both to be qualified as an evolutionary psychologist, which isn't an actual field you can major in). I got expelled though, shit was marxist and corrupt anyways. Stem has been entirely infiltrated, even shit you would find mundane and not political, like engineering.

Debunked

They hate everyone who isn't Jewish, yet they'll still use lesser races to destroy whites because whites are far more of a threat than any other race, even when whites are down bad.


Maybe Koreans and Japs, but definitely not Chinese, if you look at their genetics aswell, Chinese are absolute mongrels compared to Koreans and Japanese, truly subhuman nowadays. Maybe ancient Chinese were more pure before the mongols invaded and they got absolutely genetically assblasted into pure subhumans.

Even Koreans and Japs have some genetic faults compared to Europeans with their testosterone and estrogen levels highly limiting creativity, which is why Japs who probably have the most genetic potential in East Asia, only rose to high prominence after extensive western influence.

Not even worth going over, at the moment.

India has always been an absolute shithole
View attachment 1102034

Cope stem is dominated by indians and chinese. Keep crying for ur chinese and jewish overlords, how'd you even get kicked out of stem jfl?

also indian inventions

List of Indian inventions and discoveries - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

there is a reason the British and turkic tribes ass raped India because they were a Grade A civilisation

 

[Deleted member 13642]

also biology is a shitty degree, for femoids. This is the new age boyo curry and chink take over

 

[BrendioEEE]

View attachment 1102035
View attachment 1102036
View attachment 1102037
Cope stem is dominated by indians and chinese. Keep crying for ur chinese and jewish overlords, how'd you even get kicked out of stem jfl?

also indian inventions

List of Indian inventions and discoveries - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

there is a reason the British and turkic tribes ass raped India because they were a Grade A civilisation

Jfl

If they were such an advanced race/civilization they would have been on par with the west no matter how much they supposedly "got fucked over" not only that, they would have been able to properly oh I don't know, fight back against the muslims/europeans?

It's not like European nations haven't gotten destroyed countless amounts of times, sometimes to the point of there being literal dark ages, and yet they were still able to completely rebuild, why wasn't India able to? Maybe it's because they'd probably need 5000 years of Eugenics to be able to even have a chance to without a superior races interference.

Even the most "ideal" indians nowadays tend to have some of that Bri'ish colonizer blood running through their veins. The average IQ in India is equal to that of fucking Zimbabwe, even Ugandan's and Nigerian's are higher IQ than they are. The only reason why they're even chosen to be chattle for the Jews is because they may be low IQ, but they also have Lower Testosterone compared to their African counterparts, meaning they're far more easier to control in Stem fields, or places where they're needed for maintenance and thinking.

They'd be using literally any other subhuman race if it wasn't for their absolutely astonishingly low T levels in comparison to every other third worlder. Almost fourth worlders at this point honestly.

As for their inventions, the only thing they discovered was the last square foot in a street in Mumbai that hasn't been shit on.