White worship

[Enfant terrible]

Dont understand why is white better than ethnic ?

 

[Beast993]

Because od money and better living standards.

 

[Enfant terrible]

Because od money and better living standards.

ok

 

[Wallenberg]

I don't see a problem.

 

[Deleted member 6128]

They built west civilisation well technically Jews did but no one knows that

 

[Deleted member 3043]

why?
because some .me users said so.
You want to know it more?
Please subscribe for .me premium membership.

 

[Enfant terrible]

I don't see a problem.

View attachment 960498

thats for men what about women ?

 

[Deleted member 10185]

Cuz they skin color.. cuz eye color.. Its all about coloring. Thats why people say its bad... even tough its the eye shape that determine your eye attractiveness.

 

[Deleted member 1476]

Please subscribe for .me premium membership.

Hope serge doesn't see this

 

[Deleted member 10185]

They built west civilisation well technically Jews did but no one knows that

Ethnic were leading civilization even before white did... The best innovation came from ethnic countries... but white people used those recipe to improve them.

 

[Deleted member 10177]

It is not. There are features on the face that are attractive. All races have attractive people. White pheno is one of the top ones, but some mixed phenos are on the same tier. You also get light skinned browns.

 

[Wallenberg]

But being serious, white isn't better than ethnics. Lookswise many people just find some whites, both men and women, attractive.

 

[Deleted member 3043]

To give a bit of proper explanation :
You'r here in a western orientated website, with western orientated beauty standards, 21th century - although a bit old because now prettyboy reign supreme and for PSL autism, it's not much complementary - and guess who got western features more on average?
Western people. Notice how even slavic, etc are not considered much better here, on average, but only because of western features.

But looks are more related to culture, and soft power, than to "objective looks" that psl believe it has. So whites would face the same issue in parts of the world where their beauty is not the norm. The sole difference is that, due to globalization, things are becoming more connected and you'll have a vocal minority that prefer x or y ethnicity and some will cherrypick them, without having a more holistic approach. But what to expect from guys who believe that to be blackpilled you need high iq and sentient?

Add to that, some guys that have accomplished nothing, nor will most likely ever do with their current mentality and will power, who believe whites by essence>others individuals, which is rationnally an autistic take. Mostly it comes from an inferiority complex, because they probably see some non whites doing better than them in all regards. It's the same for racism : It's a low IQ cope, in the sense that, people have not a different essence, all share the same, and the difference in feature or skin color is "accidental" not "essential" in aristotle terminology.

And tbh worshipping of anything that is in the creation is a low sentient polytheism behaviour.

 

[Deleted member 3043]

That beeing said i don't know why for fuck sake, indians from india are in psl forums, where their "hypergamy" is not as rampant, and even more because the beauty standard are just NOT the same. This applies to most guys in non western countries with people on average that don't look white/westerners.
Lighten your skin color, be tall, even with 2 psl > 5 psl indian.

To add to my previous post, you may ask why western features are prefered in the west, and let's say arabic features in arabic countries etc ?
It's because people by nature tend to prefer their own, which is a normal and natural and wholesome instinct, for a lot of reasons.
It's cringe when some little minority of ethnics, without any dignity or virtue, cry over whites males because "whites females" don't like them, while all they will ever want is a white woman.

 

[Deleted member 5522]

 

[Deleted member 10536]

To give a bit of proper explanation :
You'r here in a western orientated website, with western orientated beauty standards, 21th century - although a bit old because now prettyboy reign supreme and for PSL autism, it's not much complementary - and guess who got western features more on average?
Western people. Notice how even slavic, etc are not considered much better here, on average, but only because of western features.

But looks are more related to culture, and soft power, than to "objective looks" that psl believe it has. So whites would face the same issue in parts of the world where their beauty is not the norm. The sole difference is that, due to globalization, things are becoming more connected and you'll have a vocal minority that prefer x or y ethnicity and some will cherrypick them, without having a more holistic approach. But what to expect from guys who believe that to be blackpilled you need high iq and sentient?

Add to that, some guys that have accomplished nothing, nor will most likely ever do with their current mentality and will power, who believe whites by essence>others individuals, which is rationnally an autistic take. Mostly it comes from an inferiority complex, because they probably see some non whites doing better than them in all regards. It's the same for racism : It's a low IQ cope, in the sense that, people have not a different essence, all share the same, and the difference in feature or skin color is "accidental" not "essential" in aristotle terminology.

And tbh worshipping of anything that is in the creation is a low sentient polytheism behaviour.

Where whites are at disadvantage?

 

[Deleted member 3043]

Where whites are at disadvantage?

Everywhere in the world where the average phenotype is not white/white passing. There are always minorities tho, as for every ethnicity, that will go for whites, and vice versa.
Not saying at disavantage, but not at advantage - same for most ethnics that aren't asian or indian in the west, they have no halo as whites, but no failo either.

 

[Deleted member 10536]

Everywhere in the world where the average phenotype is not white/white passing. There are always minorities tho, as for every ethnicity, that will go for whites, and vice versa.
Not saying at disavantage, but not at advantage - same for most ethnics that aren't asian or indian in the west, they have no halo as whites, but no failo either.

So I'd be at disadvantage in sea, asia in general, africa, etc?

 

[Deleted member 3043]

So I'd be at disadvantage in sea, asia in general, africa, etc?

Yes for the average people yes.
But if you know where you go, you'll find minorities that will find you attractive/will worship you.

Another thing to take into account is how you'r perceived : The more you go to countries that are poor, the more the white could be haloed, not much because of looks, but because of perceived success/wealth, because in this current era whites are those who are the most "advanced" productivity wise. It was another story 500 years before, and 1000 years before, could be another story in the 100 next years and etc, there are not a civilization that lasted eternally. Basically the ethnicity that is mostly "ruling" will benefit from such halo.
That's why for example you'll probably have less success in Japan than in philippines. Women just want to get rid of their "shitholes".

And this "perceived" wealth, is linked to soft power/culture. And plays a role in attraction over time - as much for example that genetics are partly just the environnement over long period of time - and this explains why in most of non white countries beeing rather chubby than lean is considered as more attractive.
Because the chubbier, the richer you'r perceived - there is a limit obviously you not gonna be obese. The lean were the hard workers.
But obviously women there won't know that on average, they'll just find "instinctively" such guys more attractive, if they have the same looks level obviously for the given place, instead of their leaner counter part.

 

[Wallenberg]

Just a reminder: you don't have to go to Asia/Africa/whatever to date ethnic foids.

 

[Deleted member 3043]

And that's why doing tinder experiment to prove anything related to others cultures and civilization is low iq/sentient.
It's a "statement of principle" in logic.
Because Tinder promotes western views of life, with a majority also of whites people/westerners using it.
The mentality is thus impacted : You'll never go on tinder if you don't want to fuck especially before marriage, and with mostly white people or white passing ones.
Let's say to summarize, it's a "degen"/alienated mentality, and this thing is just very badly seen in most on non western countries, especially culturally. That's why it's only vocal minorities that are on there. See how the countries who have vision of the world totally different than the west, don't even have tinder.

And that's why you'll probably never find a genuine "love", with a decent beeing woman, no matter how much you tried until now, no matter your looks level - and you'r decent looking - @Intjcel, on such apps. You'r prime example of that.

 

[Deleted member 7697]

Not white worshipping but white people do look better than say curries or east asians.

White people have the best features. No doubt about it.