who has the better life?

[uksucks]

Guy A:
Son of billionaire, born into wealth, gets an aston martin as his first car on his 17th birthday, never has to work

Guy B:
Basically Ronaldo or Andrew Tate. Born poor, grew up poor, maybe worked some shit jobs, never left the country, never had any nice toys. Becomes a billionaire at age 22 self made.


Maybe to you it's obvious, guy A had an objectively better life, but a lot would think guy B because he did it all himself so had more satisfaction.

Thoughts?
I still think guy A because childhood happiness is important

 

[noobs]

a, b is hedonistic

 

[uksucks]

a, b is hedonistic

True
Every poor person who becomes rich is always very materialistic

Someone like frank lampard who grew up well off but not rich lives a far more modest life

 

[Saint Casanova]

You’ll never become a billionaire at 22 if you didn’t come from a very rich family. Ronaldo and Tate aren’t even billionaires yet, although ronaldo is close to it.

 

[ey88]

A

 

[raabla]

A for sure

 

[uksucks]

You’ll never become a billionaire at 22 if you didn’t come from a very rich family. Ronaldo and Tate aren’t even billionaires yet, although ronaldo is close to it.

The examples arent accurate like that just that they weren't born rich