Who here is genuinely a misogynist?

[Deleted member 20890]

I’d say I probably am, there obviously is sexual attraction but over time being exposed to blackpill and female behavior IRL has turned me into a misogynist.

 

[Deleted member 14693]

At first I thought no but I looked up the definition and apparently yes.

 

[Deleted member 42009]

misogyism is cope, another word for MSTOW.

 

[Joe Rogancel]

Partially. I hate men more tho, especially white knight cucks

 

[Deleted member 20890]

misogyism is cope, another word for MSTOW.

This is true for a large amount of misogynists tbh.

 

[Krakowski]

a person who dislikes, despises, or is strongly prejudiced against women.

 

[TheTakeoverHasBegun]

I am
But I don't go overboard with it
I don't allow it to cloud my judgement

 

[romanstock]

Not me I love women.

 

[Deleted member 25198]

At first I thought no but I looked up the definition and apparently yes.

 

[Obito]

I hate men and women they have both done irreversible amounts of damage to our current society

 

[Deleted member 20890]

a person who dislikes, despises, or is strongly prejudiced against women.

Which is often a result of blackpill.

 

[vanillaicecream]

I dont talk to foids so I have no feelings towards them as people, outside of sexual contexts. If I did talk to them I would probably be a misogynist.

 

[Deleted member 25059]

mogergaston

 

[thenewhebbe]

the blackpill turned me into a mysogynist

EDIT :

in all seriousness i don't actually consider myself a mysogynist as in i don't hate women, but alot of foids/woke ppl would consider me a mysogynist because of some of the views i hold about women

So irs sound like you are a misyionist

 

[Deleted member 30461]

Women are inferior
Any other view is cope

 

[Deleted member 19567]

Misogynist is a fake/deceptive word. It has no depth to its definition thus why its used for labeling. wouldnt go around using it or identify/acknowledge it.

Its used as a umbrella term in todays time to villanize/categorize possible truths or influence a lack of truth discussion or question of thought regarding exploitative modern female nature/ the bad things about female nature in todays society.

Its just like the word conspiracy theorist. Or better yet flat earther. It labels entire niches of intelligent discussable topics under a sort of derogatory and insulting place. It also stops a great deal of possible discussion and change by method of good/bad social cues and norms. Just like how even bringing the subject of questioning nasa, or discussing the possibilities of the shape and nature of the earth via personal observation and data will have someone calling you a flat earther, or how even remotely thinking that governents could be fucking us over will have you called a conspiracy theorist. Speaking up about modern womens unrighteousness nature will get you called a mysogonist. And obviously those labels can potentially have you socially outcast, thus those subjects of discussion avoided and the behavior often remained unchecked/unexposed.

 

[_MVP_]

At first I thought no but I looked up the definition and apparently yes.

Blud didnt even know what a mysoginist is...

 

[_MVP_]

Btw every incel who is Not a mysoginist a cuck

 

[Deleted member 14693]

Blud didnt even know what a mysoginist is...

There are different definitions...

 

[Napoleon1800]

I am the biggest forum misogynist. The Supreme Gentleman's ghost said so

 

[Deleted member 5467]

No hatred at all, but tbh I find their input on almost everything fucking annoying.

Other than busting loads. I would rather be alone or hang out with dudes

 

[Deleted member 20890]

Misogynist is a fake/deceptive word. I wouldnt go around using it or identify/acknowledge it.

Its used as a umbrella term in todays time to villanize/ to categorize possible truths or influence a lack of truth discussion or question of thought regarding exploitative modern female nature/ the bad things about female nature in todays society.

Its just like the word conspiracy theorist. Or better yet flat earther. It labels entire niches of intelligent discussable topics under a sort of derogatory and insulting place. It also stops a great deal of possible discussion and change by method of good/bad social cues and norms. Just like how even bringing the subject of questioning nasa, or discussing the possibilities of the shape and nature of the earth via personal observation and data will have someone calling you a flat earther, or how even remotely thinking that governents could be fucking us over will have you called a conspiracy theorist. Speaking up about modern womens unrighteousness nature will get you called a mysogonist. And obviously those labels can potentially have you socially outcast, thus those subjects of discussion avoided and the behavior often remained unchecked/unexposed.

Do u think this applies to bigot and racist as well?

 

[UndiagnosedSchizo]

obviously, women are the root and causes of all of my problems

 

[Deleted member 5467]

I hate men and women they have both done irreversible amounts of damage to our current society

Based homelander

 

[Deleted member 41390]

I hate men and women they have both done irreversible amounts of damage to our current society

youre a rotting neet youre not in society

 

[Deleted member 19567]

Do u think this applies to bigot and racist as well?

Yes. Racist especially.

I thiught about this a lot. Some words should honestly not exist, as the actual definition those words catagorize would more accurately describe. For example, instead of calling someone a racist, it would 100% of the time be better to say they are :

showing prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism against a person or people on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized.

And maybe even going farther to actually describe those highlighted words in the same sentance.

See, people will say this is autistic behavior, the behavior to overexplain. But its all about the accuracy and fluidity of the information, especially ones used to categorize those that apply.

The problem with those words that catagorize definitions, is that a lot of people dont actually determine if a person applies. For example, people nowadays will call you a misogynist for saying women act too promiscuous for their nature. Yet the person using the word of labeling may not actually know what determines if a person is really showing such behavior. On top of that may not understand the entire class of definitions the word categorizes at all. Its like trying to define an equation with symbols you were never taught to understand (the prerequisites) correctly.

The kicker is also that anyone can create a word using definitions. It turns into code. Eventually the definitions lose meaning if you use to many expressions. I can say that any women who looks at a man with the urge to use his resources is a “uuksbl”. Or i can create a word that catagorizes “good” behavior with murder or exploitation by manipulating the categorizations. So while the word is a real word, it dosent really bring any significant learning progression. And eventually the word could be used as the definition to another word or word that categorizes definitions.

so the accuracy of the information declines . It becomes convoluted and new definitions are then created. Only problem is capability and accuracy. And that goes into how a lot of people don’t understand the actual previous meanings and definitions, and how they get lose due to categorizations. Especially by people who use the categorizations of definitions and not the actual definitions themselves.

 

[sharkcel]

Holes are inferior in every way yet soyciety glorifies them so yes

 

[Obito]

youre a rotting neet youre not in society

are you projecting ?

 

[halfbloodaryanmaxxe]

Partially. I hate men more tho, especially white knight cucks

jealous ethnic

 

[halfbloodaryanmaxxe]

I see no reason to be mysoginystic to women in general. you can dislike a handful but women in general is not valid

 

[thecel]

Problem is normies and black/redpillers have completely different thresholds of what counts as misogyny. What’s a simple fact of biology to a redpiller is misogynistic to a bluepiller.

 

[thecel]

the blackpill turned me into a mysogynist

EDIT :

in all seriousness i don't actually consider myself a mysogynist as in i don't hate women, but alot of foids/woke ppl would consider me a mysogynist because of some of the views i hold about women

normies and black/redpillers have completely different thresholds of what counts as misogyny. What’s a simple fact of biology to a redpiller is misogynistic to a bluepiller.

 

[thecel]

Yes. Racist especially.

I thiught about this a lot. Some words should honestly not exist, as the actual definition those words catagorize would more accurately describe. For example, instead of calling someone a racist, it would 100% of the time be better to say they are :

showing prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism against a person or people on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized.

And maybe even going farther to actually describe those highlighted words in the same sentance.

See, people will say this is autistic behavior, the behavior to overexplain. But its all about the accuracy and fluidity of the information, especially ones used to categorize those that apply.

The problem with those words that catagorize definitions, is that a lot of people dont actually determine if a person applies. For example, people nowadays will call you a misogynist for saying women act too promiscuous for their nature. Yet the person using the word of labeling may not actually know what determines if a person is really showing such behavior. On top of that may not understand the entire class of definitions the word categorizes at all. Its like trying to define an equation with symbols you were never taught to understand (the prerequisites) correctly.

The kicker is also that anyone can create a word using definitions. It turns into code. Eventually the definitions lose meaning if you use to many expressions. I can say that any women who looks at a man with the urge to use his resources is a “uuksbl”. Or i can create a word that catagorizes “good” behavior with murder or exploitation by manipulating the categorizations. So while the word is a real word, it dosent really bring any significant learning progression. And eventually the word could be used as the definition to another word or word that categorizes definitions.

so the accuracy of the information declines . It becomes convoluted and new definitions are then created. Only problem is capability and accuracy. And that goes into how a lot of people don’t understand the actual previous meanings and definitions, and how they get lose due to categorizations. Especially by people who use the categorizations of definitions and not the actual definitions themselves.

high IQ

 

[LooksOrDeath]

Yes. Racist especially.

I thiught about this a lot. Some words should honestly not exist, as the actual definition those words catagorize would more accurately describe. For example, instead of calling someone a racist, it would 100% of the time be better to say they are :

showing prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism against a person or people on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized.

And maybe even going farther to actually describe those highlighted words in the same sentance.

See, people will say this is autistic behavior, the behavior to overexplain. But its all about the accuracy and fluidity of the information, especially ones used to categorize those that apply.

The problem with those words that catagorize definitions, is that a lot of people dont actually determine if a person applies. For example, people nowadays will call you a misogynist for saying women act too promiscuous for their nature. Yet the person using the word of labeling may not actually know what determines if a person is really showing such behavior. On top of that may not understand the entire class of definitions the word categorizes at all. Its like trying to define an equation with symbols you were never taught to understand (the prerequisites) correctly.

The kicker is also that anyone can create a word using definitions. It turns into code. Eventually the definitions lose meaning if you use to many expressions. I can say that any women who looks at a man with the urge to use his resources is a “uuksbl”. Or i can create a word that catagorizes “good” behavior with murder or exploitation by manipulating the categorizations. So while the word is a real word, it dosent really bring any significant learning progression. And eventually the word could be used as the definition to another word or word that categorizes definitions.

so the accuracy of the information declines . It becomes convoluted and new definitions are then created. Only problem is capability and accuracy. And that goes into how a lot of people don’t understand the actual previous meanings and definitions, and how they get lose due to categorizations. Especially by people who use the categorizations of definitions and not the actual definitions themselves.

n word is a good example imo
the perceived definition purely depends on the skin color of the person saying it, a white person saying nigga and a black person saying nigga might as well be saying blue and red

 

[LooksOrDeath]

Problem is normies and black/redpillers have completely different thresholds of what counts as misogyny. What’s a simple fact of biology to a redpiller is misogynistic to a bluepiller.

If i shared my thoughts most people would think i'm very misogynistic while half the users here would think i'm a borderline feminist

 

[lonelycurry]

i hate women and want to rape them

 

[Deleted member 20890]

If i shared my thoughts most people would think i'm very misogynistic while half the users here would think i'm a borderline feminist

Give just one example.

 

[LooksOrDeath]

Give just one example.

Men are nearly objectively better at creating and running civilization than women are, societies that have emphasised masculine traits have been the most successful in spreading their influence.

men are objectively better at physical activities ( no shit)

the majority of great innovators and leaders are men even if you control for "misogyny"



Women going for only a fraction of attractive men are completely justified since that is how natural selection works. It is a necessary component of societal growth since it encourages men to compete and cooperate with each other to build civilisation. Also ensures that subsequent generations are genetically fitter than their previous ones.

the average woman contributes more to modern western society than the average man does, according to education level and employment. (emphasis on average)

 

[LooksOrDeath]

Give just one example.

"one example"

s'over for reading comprehension

 

[Deleted member 23114]

I’d say I probably am, there obviously is sexual attraction but over time being exposed to blackpill and female behavior IRL has turned me into a misogynist.

Same

 

[chadmanlet04]

i am, but it's cope.

You only hate women and are bitter towards them because you are invisible to them. You are resentful towards what you can't reach and enjoy.

Fox calls the grapes he cannot reach sour.

 

[Deleted member 20890]

Women going for only a fraction of attractive men are completely justified since that is how natural selection works. It is a necessary component of societal growth since it encourages men to compete and cooperate with each other to build civilisation.

Is this actually true in our society? It does not seem that society is growing.

 

[oldcelcel1983]

I am, but feel guilty about it sometimes because of my mother.

 

[Deleted member 6305]

Imagine using the word misogyny unironically

 

[LooksOrDeath]

Is this actually true in our society? It does not seem that society is growing.

Not yet. There's a delay in the growth of hypergamy and men's reaction to that growth. I don't think it's long before our society undergoes a great shift due to the increasing number of men who are unable to secure a mate. We're in a ticking bomb, and it's not long until that bomb goes off.

 

[oldcelcel1983]

Is this actually true in our society? It does not seem that society is growing.

Only simps do this fucking shit. Blackpillers know it's sexual attraction or nothing. I hope these men get divorce raped/stabbed in their sleep.

 

[oldcelcel1983]

Not yet. There's a delay in the growth of hypergamy and men's reaction to that growth. I don't think it's long before our society undergoes a great shift due to the increasing number of men who are unable to secure a mate. We're in a ticking bomb, and it's not long until that bomb goes off.

So back to beta buxing and tradmasc faggotry?

 

[LooksOrDeath]

So back to beta buxing and tradmasc faggotry?

yes, eventually

you need to keep your men happy to keep your nation strong

 

[oldcelcel1983]

yes, eventually

you need to keep your men happy to keep your nation strong

But I don't want to provide for some whore.

 

[LooksOrDeath]

Only simps do this fucking shit. Blackpillers know it's sexual attraction or nothing. I hope these men get divorce raped/stabbed in their sleep.

Most guys aren't sexually attractive. Betabuxxing is a great offer for them.

I don't like it either