Who is the most important 20th century philosopher [POLL]

[chrishell]

Who is the most important 20th century philosopher [POLL]

 

[Lonenely sigma]

I've never heard about any of these guys but, instead, know every single skull angle and proportion you can think of.

Its over

 

[chrishell]

I've never heard about any of these guys but, instead, know every single skull angle and proportion you can think of.

Its over

Place your vote.

 

[Lonenely sigma]

Place your vote.

Russell sounds smart ngl

 

[Oueyy]

Mike mew

 

[fuxkdakikez]

gucci mane

 

[chrishell]

@Flowerpot

Justify Heidegger.

 

[noahwillascend]

Ninja

 

[chrishell]

Ninja

Why did you vote Quine?

 

[chrishell]

@Klasik616 Interesting choice, but a bit predictable from you.

 

[Klasik616]

Heidegger or Deleuze then Wittgenstein or Adorno

 

[diditeverbegin]

It’s hamza

 

[NorwegianGenes]

def Wittgenstein, he kind of transfigured the way we understand language

 

[Klasik616]

@Klasik616 Interesting choice, but a bit predictable from you.

How did you know? I like Tractatus the best but Wittgenstein knowledge of philosophy is lacking.

 

[chrishell]

How did you know? I like Tractatus the best but Wittgenstein knowledge of philosophy is lacking.

What's wrong with his knowledge of philosophy

 

[alriodai]

Milan Kundera althought he's not considered as one

 

[chrishell]

Milan Kundera althought he's not considered as one

Why Kundera?

 

[FascisstChad]

 

[Flowerpot]

@Flowerpot

Justify Heidegger.

Idk.

 

[alriodai]

Why Kundera?

He's not really a philosopher anyway to be honest with you, althought his books are more like drama-philosophy story that makes you think
Because he makes me self-reflect on my life

 

[Klasik616]

What's wrong with his knowledge of philosophy

He didn't made lectures of other philosophers who weren't related to the study of logic and matemathics. He didn't understood the kind of discourse ethics has (first part), lately he did change the understanding of propositions meaning through the concept of social use but I don't see him going further than descriptive propositions.

 

[chrishell]

He didn't made lectures of other philosophers who weren't related to the study of logic and matemathics. He didn't understood the kind of discourse ethics has (first part), lately he did change the understanding of propositions meaning through the concept of social use but I don't see him going further than descriptive propositions.

You are saying he was too myope into his own interets ?

 

[chrishell]

He's not really a philosopher anyway to be honest with you, althought his books are more like drama-philosophy story that makes you think
Because he makes me self-reflect on my life

I see. In any case, he is not a poll option.

Place your vote.

 

[Klasik616]

You are saying he was too myope into his own interets ?

Yea but his argument was logically right. That doesn't mean it was true cus philosophy is not about propositions that could be true or false, it's about supositions and the free use of language.

 

[chrishell]

Yea but his argument was logically right. That doesn't mean it was true cus philosophy is not about propositions that could be true or false, it's about supositions and the free use of language.

What is the difference between being logically right and truthful then?

 

[Klasik616]

What is the difference between being logically right and truthful then?

All propositions who have a sense could be understood because they're logical, language is logical. We are free to create propositions but wether they are true or false doesn't depend on the logical structure of the sentence but in our own understanding of the world around us... It's way too long to explain but it is on the book. If you don't understand the logic of language you cannot even think.

 

[BimaxLaser]

Why am I not in here

 

[chrishell]

All propositions who have a sense could be understood because they're logical, language is logical. We are free to create propositions but wether they are true or false doesn't depend on the logical structure of the sentence but in our own understanding of the world around us... It's way too long to explain but it is on the book. If you don't understand the logic of language you cannot even think.

So truth is context dependent but Wittgenstein tries to reduce truth to logics that are context independent.

 

[Klasik616]

So truth is context dependent but Wittgenstein tries to reduce truth to logics that are context independent.

Yea and what happens next? He encounters 2 problems.

 

[sportsmogger]

Place your vote.

bro thinks hes @Reckless Turtle

 

[chrishell]

bro thinks hes @Reckless Turtle

Place your vote.

 

[chrishell]

bro thinks hes @Reckless Turtle

Why

 

[sportsmogger]

Why

idk any of them

Place your vote.

he says the same shit


ur a weird mix of @Reckless Turtle and @Xangsane

inb4 Xangsane replies with ”why?”

 

[chrishell]

idk any of them

he says the same shit


ur a weird mix of @Reckless Turtle and @Xangsane

inb4 Xangsane replies with ”why?”

Ok

 

[alriodai]

OP if woman please can I have a chance please please please!!!

 

[chrishell]

OP if woman please can I have a chance please please please!!!

My gender is none of your business.

Hop off.

 

[alriodai]

My gender is none of your business.

Hop off.

I love you being assertive, my type, when are you pegging me?

 

[Reckless Turtle]

@_MVP_