Who mogs

Joaquin

Joaquin

Kraken
Joined
Aug 8, 2024
Posts
3,143
Reputation
2,818
1000086533
1000086534

Some niggas saying josh has less appeal and looks ogre has to be a joke, josh is crearly better looking than marlon.
 
  • +1
Reactions: sub5mumbaifinalboss
Marlon looks better, has better averageness and overall ratios + 12 teeth smile , mc gregor has only better bones but also horse faced
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2414763h and VohnnyBoy
Marlon looks better, has better averageness and overall ratios + 12 teeth smile , mc gregor has only better bones but also horse faced
How is he horsefaced? His tfhwr is basically ideal and his smile is giant too. Ratio wise he is excellent too
 
How is he horsefaced? His tfhwr is basically ideal and his smile is giant too. Ratio wise he is excellent too
Fwhr looks good indeed he doesnt look really horse faced at first impaxt, but measure his midface ratio and you’ll see that is slightly off. And nah he doesnt have marlon smile, he has max 10 teeth but doesnt hit the 50 mm intermolar width, teeth are not white and straight as marlon (who may have veneers) and bite alignment of marlon is unmatched. Also mcgregor smile if im not mistaken is a little bit more gummy.
Ratio wise they are close but marlon mogs in overall eye spacing / pfl / esr, he doesnt miss a single ideal ratio in the eye area. The only metric in which mc gregor mogs is bone mass - hyoid and undertones /color
 
  • +1
Reactions: Joaquin
Marlon looks like a better version of him, more pretty and appealing , shorter philtrum and ofc also with less bone mass
 
Fwhr looks good indeed he doesnt look really horse faced at first impaxt, but measure his midface ratio and you’ll see that is slightly off. And nah he doesnt have marlon smile, he has max 10 teeth but doesnt hit the 50 mm intermolar width, teeth are not white and straight as marlon (who may have veneers) and bite alignment of marlon is unmatched. Also mcgregor smile if im not mistaken is a little bit more gummy.
Ratio wise they are close but marlon mogs in overall eye spacing / pfl / esr, he doesnt miss a single ideal ratio in the eye area. The only metric in which mc gregor mogs is bone mass - hyoid and undertones /color
Right. But imo josh still looks better, even tho his face is less approachable
 
  • +1
Reactions: CD34
Fwhr looks good indeed he doesnt look really horse faced at first impaxt, but measure his midface ratio and you’ll see that is slightly off. And nah he doesnt have marlon smile, he has max 10 teeth but doesnt hit the 50 mm intermolar width, teeth are not white and straight as marlon (who may have veneers) and bite alignment of marlon is unmatched. Also mcgregor smile if im not mistaken is a little bit more gummy.
Ratio wise they are close but marlon mogs in overall eye spacing / pfl / esr, he doesnt miss a single ideal ratio in the eye area. The only metric in which mc gregor mogs is bone mass - hyoid and undertones /color
Josh midface is 0.99, basically perfect. His skull is just enormous
 
Fwhr looks good indeed he doesnt look really horse faced at first impaxt, but measure his midface ratio and you’ll see that is slightly off. And nah he doesnt have marlon smile, he has max 10 teeth but doesnt hit the 50 mm intermolar width, teeth are not white and straight as marlon (who may have veneers) and bite alignment of marlon is unmatched. Also mcgregor smile if im not mistaken is a little bit more gummy.
Ratio wise they are close but marlon mogs in overall eye spacing / pfl / esr, he doesnt miss a single ideal ratio in the eye area. The only metric in which mc gregor mogs is bone mass - hyoid and undertones /color
Josh mogs in angularity and bonemass, I suppose people choose marlon because his face looks more femenine and approachable.
 
Josh mogs in angularity and bonemass, I suppose people choose marlon because his face looks more femenine and approachable.
They are close in angularity tbh, they both have 85/90 degrees jaw frontal angle
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2414763h
Marlon of course
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2414763h and CD34
Esr perfect
Midface too
I agree that the midface is slightly off so not noticeable, at most it's that horse philtrum that makes his face look a bit long, but anyway his ESR is not perfect, anyone can see that he has too much lateral projection, Bizygo is a bit off, look at Marlon's that is perfect + coupled with perfect eye spacing, wide pfl wide icd in 1:1 ratios, ideal medial cantus
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2414763h
Marlon
 
  • +1
Reactions: CD34
Not to mention that marlon averageness obliterates him
 
Marlon

he's masculine while having hints of femininity. mogs in PSL and appeal
 
Midface is literally perfect, measure it.Also his philtrum isnt long at all it is at most 1.5cm which is totally ideal.Esr is ideal Ive measured it too his only eye area flaw is his ipd
I agree that the midface is slightly off so not noticeable, at most it's that horse philtrum that makes his face look a bit long, but anyway his ESR is not perfect, anyone can see that he has too much lateral projection, Bizygo is a bit off, look at Marlon's that is perfect + coupled with perfect eye spacing, wide pfl wide icd in 1:1 ratios, ideal medial cantus
 
Midface is literally perfect, measure it.Also his philtrum isnt long at all it is at most 1.5cm which is totally ideal.Esr is ideal Ive measured it too his only eye area flaw is his ipd
Not ipd it’s esr and eye spacing damn!!! He already has around 65mm more ipd and he’ll look like a hammered shark
 
Not ipd it’s esr and eye spacing damn!!! He already has around 65mm more ipd and he’ll look like a hammered shark
Im saying his eyes are slightly wide set lol. But his wide face balances it by making his esr ideal
 
Yes, women would definitely prefer to date Josh over Marlon, guys, go ahead and seek to look like Josh!!! You will mog!!!!

(Im trying to reduce competition)
Josh has super high appeal. Both have
 
Marlon mogs

Josh looks like a meme
 
  • +1
Reactions: CD34
me honestly
 
  • +1
Reactions: Joaquin
Fwhr looks good indeed he doesnt look really horse faced at first impaxt, but measure his midface ratio and you’ll see that is slightly off. And nah he doesnt have marlon smile, he has max 10 teeth but doesnt hit the 50 mm intermolar width, teeth are not white and straight as marlon (who may have veneers) and bite alignment of marlon is unmatched. Also mcgregor smile if im not mistaken is a little bit more gummy.
Ratio wise they are close but marlon mogs in overall eye spacing / pfl / esr, he doesnt miss a single ideal ratio in the eye area. The only metric in which mc gregor mogs is bone mass - hyoid and undertones /color
does low imw cause ugly smile or intercanine width plays a bigger role?
 

Similar threads

yanis
Replies
15
Views
270
yanis
yanis
druiglooksmaxer
Replies
17
Views
426
Latinus
Latinus
napyelashes
Replies
32
Views
320
enlightful
enlightful
Tigermoggerlol
Serious Mukasa is htn
Replies
17
Views
237
druiglooksmaxer
druiglooksmaxer
chadhamed
Replies
1
Views
71
MtnLord
MtnLord

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top