
Joaquin
Kraken
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2024
- Posts
- 3,143
- Reputation
- 2,818


Some niggas saying josh has less appeal and looks ogre has to be a joke, josh is crearly better looking than marlon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
How is he horsefaced? His tfhwr is basically ideal and his smile is giant too. Ratio wise he is excellent tooMarlon looks better, has better averageness and overall ratios + 12 teeth smile , mc gregor has only better bones but also horse faced
Fwhr looks good indeed he doesnt look really horse faced at first impaxt, but measure his midface ratio and you’ll see that is slightly off. And nah he doesnt have marlon smile, he has max 10 teeth but doesnt hit the 50 mm intermolar width, teeth are not white and straight as marlon (who may have veneers) and bite alignment of marlon is unmatched. Also mcgregor smile if im not mistaken is a little bit more gummy.How is he horsefaced? His tfhwr is basically ideal and his smile is giant too. Ratio wise he is excellent too
Right. But imo josh still looks better, even tho his face is less approachableFwhr looks good indeed he doesnt look really horse faced at first impaxt, but measure his midface ratio and you’ll see that is slightly off. And nah he doesnt have marlon smile, he has max 10 teeth but doesnt hit the 50 mm intermolar width, teeth are not white and straight as marlon (who may have veneers) and bite alignment of marlon is unmatched. Also mcgregor smile if im not mistaken is a little bit more gummy.
Ratio wise they are close but marlon mogs in overall eye spacing / pfl / esr, he doesnt miss a single ideal ratio in the eye area. The only metric in which mc gregor mogs is bone mass - hyoid and undertones /color
Josh midface is 0.99, basically perfect. His skull is just enormousFwhr looks good indeed he doesnt look really horse faced at first impaxt, but measure his midface ratio and you’ll see that is slightly off. And nah he doesnt have marlon smile, he has max 10 teeth but doesnt hit the 50 mm intermolar width, teeth are not white and straight as marlon (who may have veneers) and bite alignment of marlon is unmatched. Also mcgregor smile if im not mistaken is a little bit more gummy.
Ratio wise they are close but marlon mogs in overall eye spacing / pfl / esr, he doesnt miss a single ideal ratio in the eye area. The only metric in which mc gregor mogs is bone mass - hyoid and undertones /color
Josh mogs in angularity and bonemass, I suppose people choose marlon because his face looks more femenine and approachable.Fwhr looks good indeed he doesnt look really horse faced at first impaxt, but measure his midface ratio and you’ll see that is slightly off. And nah he doesnt have marlon smile, he has max 10 teeth but doesnt hit the 50 mm intermolar width, teeth are not white and straight as marlon (who may have veneers) and bite alignment of marlon is unmatched. Also mcgregor smile if im not mistaken is a little bit more gummy.
Ratio wise they are close but marlon mogs in overall eye spacing / pfl / esr, he doesnt miss a single ideal ratio in the eye area. The only metric in which mc gregor mogs is bone mass - hyoid and undertones /color
Josh midface is 0.99, basically perfect. His skull is just enormous
They are close in angularity tbh, they both have 85/90 degrees jaw frontal angleJosh mogs in angularity and bonemass, I suppose people choose marlon because his face looks more femenine and approachable.
Esr perfectView attachment 3945860
This two ratio are slightly off i guess
I agree that the midface is slightly off so not noticeable, at most it's that horse philtrum that makes his face look a bit long, but anyway his ESR is not perfect, anyone can see that he has too much lateral projection, Bizygo is a bit off, look at Marlon's that is perfect + coupled with perfect eye spacing, wide pfl wide icd in 1:1 ratios, ideal medial cantusEsr perfect
Midface too
I agree that the midface is slightly off so not noticeable, at most it's that horse philtrum that makes his face look a bit long, but anyway his ESR is not perfect, anyone can see that he has too much lateral projection, Bizygo is a bit off, look at Marlon's that is perfect + coupled with perfect eye spacing, wide pfl wide icd in 1:1 ratios, ideal medial cantus
Not ipd it’s esr and eye spacing damn!!! He already has around 65mm more ipd and he’ll look like a hammered sharkMidface is literally perfect, measure it.Also his philtrum isnt long at all it is at most 1.5cm which is totally ideal.Esr is ideal Ive measured it too his only eye area flaw is his ipd
Just facially Marlon has a better front but Josh eviscerates from the side, Marlon mogs overall since he’s taller with a better frame thoView attachment 3945826View attachment 3945827
Some niggas saying josh has less appeal and looks ogre has to be a joke, josh is crearly better looking than marlon.
Im saying his eyes are slightly wide set lol. But his wide face balances it by making his esr idealNot ipd it’s esr and eye spacing damn!!! He already has around 65mm more ipd and he’ll look like a hammered shark
Yes, women would definitely prefer to date Josh over Marlon, guys, go ahead and seek to look like Josh!!! You will mog!!!!View attachment 3945826View attachment 3945827
Some niggas saying josh has less appeal and looks ogre has to be a joke, josh is crearly better looking than marlon.
Josh has super high appeal. Both haveYes, women would definitely prefer to date Josh over Marlon, guys, go ahead and seek to look like Josh!!! You will mog!!!!
(Im trying to reduce competition)
does low imw cause ugly smile or intercanine width plays a bigger role?Fwhr looks good indeed he doesnt look really horse faced at first impaxt, but measure his midface ratio and you’ll see that is slightly off. And nah he doesnt have marlon smile, he has max 10 teeth but doesnt hit the 50 mm intermolar width, teeth are not white and straight as marlon (who may have veneers) and bite alignment of marlon is unmatched. Also mcgregor smile if im not mistaken is a little bit more gummy.
Ratio wise they are close but marlon mogs in overall eye spacing / pfl / esr, he doesnt miss a single ideal ratio in the eye area. The only metric in which mc gregor mogs is bone mass - hyoid and undertones /color
i dont like his ears, looks like a goblinView attachment 3945826View attachment 3945827
Some niggas saying josh has less appeal and looks ogre has to be a joke, josh is crearly better looking than marlon.