Who would you rather look like Leo or Brad

[Deleted member 6467]

vs

 

[Kekee]

View attachment 404049


View attachment 404053

View attachment 404055View attachment 404056View attachment 404057
vs
View attachment 404058
View attachment 404070View attachment 404074View attachment 404076

View attachment 404078

Pitt.

 

[Deleted member 4671]

 

[Beetlejuice]

Pitt,Leo prime was too short.

 

[Deleted member 6467]

Pitt,Leo prime was too short.

But what if prime Leo lasted as long a Pitt would you wanna look like Leo then?

 

[Beetlejuice]

But what if prime Leo lasted as long a Pitt would you wanna look like Leo then?

Maybe,both are in the same level to me.

 

[Vidyacoper]

leo

 

[needsolution]

Prime Leo was better looking but i would rather look like Brad.

 

[RichardSpencel]

Option C: Arvid

 

[balding17yomanletcel]

brad mogs

 

[needsolution]

Option C: Arvid

View attachment 404108

RIP, i used to dislike his spam but now when he is gone i see how much forum lost.

 

[Kingkellz]

Obviously Pitt.
Even on first glance you can easily tell Pitt has a better face shape (facial taper), versatility, and longevity.

- Leo's midface looks stunted.
- Leo's neurocranuim to splanchnocranium ratio is also terrible. A noticeably bigger neuro to splanchno like Leo's looks weak, feminine, and infantile. His bit-temporal width and overall forehead size(width + height) is disproportionately larger than his lower third. I think this might have to do with the size and projection of his parietal bone as well.
- Leo's hairline is worse
- Leo's face is also more prone to being and looking bloated mainly due to the reasons I listed above
- Leo cannot pull of the buzzed/bald look like Pitt can. It's quite obvious which of the two aged better.

 

[owlofathena]

View attachment 404105

Obviously Pitt.
Even on first glance you can easily tell Pitt has a better face shape (facial taper), versatility, and longevity.

- Leo's midface looks stunted.
- Leo's neurocranuim to splanchnocranium ratio is also terrible. A noticeably bigger neuro to splanchno like Leo's looks weak, feminine, and infantile. His bit-temporal width and overall forehead size(width + height) is disproportionately larger than his lower third. I think this might have to do with the size and projection of his parietal bone as well.
- Leo's hairline is worse
- Leo's face is also more prone to being and looking bloated mainly due to the reasons I listed above
- Leo cannot pull of the buzzed/bald look like Pitt can. It's quite obvious which of the two aged better.

Brad takes better care of himself as well

 

[needsolution]

View attachment 404105

Obviously Pitt.
Even on first glance you can easily tell Pitt has a better face shape (facial taper), versatility, and longevity.

- Leo's midface looks stunted.
- Leo's neurocranuim to splanchnocranium ratio is also terrible. A noticeably bigger neuro to splanchno like Leo's looks weak, feminine, and infantile. His bit-temporal width and overall forehead size(width + height) is disproportionately larger than his lower third. I think this might have to do with the size and projection of his parietal bone as well.
- Leo's hairline is worse
- Leo's face is also more prone to being and looking bloated mainly due to the reasons I listed above
- Leo cannot pull of the buzzed/bald look like Pitt can. It's quite obvious which of the two aged better.

Girls like Pitt more too
I mean outside teens who worship Leo most women love Pitt more. Just check comments under this video.


From aesthetical point of view prime Leo mogged Brad but when u included aging, sex appeal then Brad Pitt mogs hard.

 

[Deleted member 6467]

View attachment 404105

Obviously Pitt.
Even on first glance you can easily tell Pitt has a better face shape (facial taper), versatility, and longevity.

- Leo's midface looks stunted.
- Leo's neurocranuim to splanchnocranium ratio is also terrible. A noticeably bigger neuro to splanchno like Leo's looks weak, feminine, and infantile. His bit-temporal width and overall forehead size(width + height) is disproportionately larger than his lower third. I think this might have to do with the size and projection of his parietal bone as well.
- Leo's hairline is worse
- Leo's face is also more prone to being and looking bloated mainly due to the reasons I listed above
- Leo cannot pull of the buzzed/bald look like Pitt can. It's quite obvious which of the two aged better.

I was talking more about there prime selfs i know Leo didn’t age or have a better body but in his prime I think he looked better facialy

 

[Kingkellz]

I was talking more about there prime selfs i know Leo didn’t age or have a better body but in his prime I think he look better facialy

He has better eye area and was a better prettyboy than Pitt was.
But looking at it from a purely PSL aesthetics standpoint, Pitts facial shape and structure is conventionally more attractive and masculine. Which is also one of the reasons why he aged better than leo.
If it was a prettyboy battle I would give a slight edge to Leo.

 

[TUSSELEIF]

How did Leo’s face get so wide anyway

 

[Deleted member 6467]

Girls like Pitt more too
I mean outside teens who worship Leo most women love Pitt more. Just check comments under this video.


From aesthetical point of view prime Leo mogged Brad but when u included aging, sex appeal then Brad Pitt mogs hard.

I guess Johnny mogs pitt then look at these comments

 

[needsolution]

I guess Johnny mogs pit then

Nah prime Pitt is simply best looking guy in Hollywood. Dicaprio is a bit behind him imo Depp is very good looking but aesthetically he lacks something.
I saw a lot voting polls on female forums and it was always Pitt>DiCaprio=Depp

Leo aesthetically mogs them when it comes to prime but overall Pitt outplays him when it comes to women. Leo face was simply too childish/feminine.
He peaked in Total Eclipse. Godly looks.

 

[Deleted member 6467]

Nah prime Pitt is simply best looking guy in Hollywood. Dicaprio is a bit behind him imo Depp is very good looking but aesthetically he lacks something.
I saw a lot voting polls on female forums and it was always Pitt>DiCaprio=Depp

Leo aesthetically mogs them when it comes to prime but overall Pitt outplays him when it comes to women. Leo face was simply too childish/feminine.
He peaked in Total Eclipse. Godly looks.
View attachment 404180

I agree Leo dose look a little to feminine so girls 26+ probably prefer Brad I was thinking from a 18 year old prospective but honestly from my experience older girls lie about thinking Guys look to young trust me

also Leo just his peak in Romeo and Juliet beauty was unholy

 

[needsolution]

I agree Leo dose look a little to feminine so girls 26+ probably prefer Brad I was thinking from a 18 year old prospective but honestly from my experience older girls lie about thinking Guys look to young trust me

also Leo just his peak in Romeo and Juliet

I hated that movie. Leo was good but this subhuman who played Juliet ughh... They could give hotter or better actress

 

[Deleted member 6467]

I hated that movie. Leo was good but this subhuman who played Juliet ughh... They could give hotter or better actress

That movie was indeed bad older Romeo and Juliet movie was much better, she wasn’t that bad looking it was just her nose

 

[Deleted member 5683]

I picked Brad even though I used to have Leo avi

 

[needsolution]

That movie was indeed bad older Romeo and Juliet movie was much better, she wasn’t that bad looking it was just her nose

View attachment 404194View attachment 404195View attachment 404196

Dont cope, she is average. Leo mogged her to another world.

 

[Deleted member 6467]

Dont cope, she is average. Leo mogged her to another world.

What about rose

 

[Stingray]

Pitt,Leo prime was too short.

Leo is taller than brad

 

[needsolution]

What about rose

View attachment 404281View attachment 404282View attachment 404283View attachment 404284

I fapped to her, big yes.

 

[Beetlejuice]

Leo is taller than brad

Not a relevant difference.

 

[Deleted member 6467]

End of this thread Brad won 35-10 (That 10 including me)