coastal
#1 ranked oxyfarmer
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2026
- Posts
- 3,931
- Reputation
- 7,442
TLDR in the end but please read
throughout history we've NEVER seen a truly Anarchistic society being able to prosper.
perhaps the closest we got to "Anarchism" were Catalonia in mid 20th century and post revolutionary Ukraine in 1918,
both of which lasted LESS THAN 3 YEARS
BUT WHY? on the surface, Anarchism has answers to every critique. it's logical, rational and almost irrefutable.
taxation is theft by definition, voluntary association is good for everyone, and being able to do what you want without the government controlling you sounds amazing
throughout my journey of reading Hoppe and Mises theory, i came to the only conclusion that makes sense to me.
i deeply believe that it's because most people (around 80% i believe, so 4 in 5) are FUCKING RETARDS
no matter how many logical arguments you make, it doesnt matter if people you try to build this "utopia" with are fucking illogical
"dont murder coz violation of NAP" very cool, but why ought we follow the NAP. consequences?
there are consequences right now yet people still murder and steal. so how would this be any better?
"people wont do bad things coz it's not in their self interest" 80%+ of people regularly make decisions that make their lives WORSE, NOT BETTER
we're not very logical creatures. in our day to day we operate on instincts
Anarchism can truly work only if everyone participating in society is a logical, rational individual.
because no matter how many good arguments you give for NAP and voluntarism it WILL NOT MATTER if people just dont fucking care about logic
that's the exact issue i have with all Anarchistic political ideologies, whether it's communism, anarcho-capitalism or Hoppeanism.
tagging politcels @iwannasleeponurlap @lemureater @Revan @Navity @FramepiII
TLDR: Anarchy doesnt work because 80% of people are illogical retards not working in their own self interest and harming the society.
a ruling power is necessary to force the retards to do what smarter people decided is best for them

throughout history we've NEVER seen a truly Anarchistic society being able to prosper.
perhaps the closest we got to "Anarchism" were Catalonia in mid 20th century and post revolutionary Ukraine in 1918,
both of which lasted LESS THAN 3 YEARS

BUT WHY? on the surface, Anarchism has answers to every critique. it's logical, rational and almost irrefutable.
taxation is theft by definition, voluntary association is good for everyone, and being able to do what you want without the government controlling you sounds amazing
throughout my journey of reading Hoppe and Mises theory, i came to the only conclusion that makes sense to me.
i deeply believe that it's because most people (around 80% i believe, so 4 in 5) are FUCKING RETARDS
no matter how many logical arguments you make, it doesnt matter if people you try to build this "utopia" with are fucking illogical
"dont murder coz violation of NAP" very cool, but why ought we follow the NAP. consequences?
there are consequences right now yet people still murder and steal. so how would this be any better?
"people wont do bad things coz it's not in their self interest" 80%+ of people regularly make decisions that make their lives WORSE, NOT BETTER
we're not very logical creatures. in our day to day we operate on instincts
Anarchism can truly work only if everyone participating in society is a logical, rational individual.
because no matter how many good arguments you give for NAP and voluntarism it WILL NOT MATTER if people just dont fucking care about logic
that's the exact issue i have with all Anarchistic political ideologies, whether it's communism, anarcho-capitalism or Hoppeanism.
tagging politcels @iwannasleeponurlap @lemureater @Revan @Navity @FramepiII
TLDR: Anarchy doesnt work because 80% of people are illogical retards not working in their own self interest and harming the society.
a ruling power is necessary to force the retards to do what smarter people decided is best for them





