Why are AI CEOs so ugly?

[Godtis]

Is it just a bunch of LTNs who want to take revenge on better-looking people by turning the world into a dystopian digital shithole?

 

[albanianblackguy]

Is it just a bunch of LTNs who want to take revenge on better-looking people by turning the world into a dystopian digital shithole?
View attachment 3560493View attachment 3560496

mental issues combined with not leaving their house and shit genes and on top of that they want power to compensate for being ugly

 

[Snicket]

Is it just a bunch of LTNs who want to take revenge on better-looking people by turning the world into a dystopian digital shithole?
View attachment 3560493View attachment 3560496

According to many users on .org, looks are the greatest predictor of professional success.

 

[Godtis]

mental issues combined with not leaving their house and shit genes and on top of that they want power to compensate for being ugly

They should be taken down (in Minecraft) before it's too late.

 

[Brus Wane]

CEOs are ugly in general.

What, you think Sanjay Mehrotra or Haviv Iilan look like moggers or something?

Even the foids are awful
Gail Boudreaux & Jane Fraser (google to lose your boner)

 

[AdamsHere]

They became AI CEOs because they knew they were ugly and wealth was their only option.

There are scientific studies on the ugliest people being the richest.

 

[Saint Casanova]

According to many users on .org, looks are the greatest predictor of professional success.

It’s tenacity, intelligence and connections that’s the biggest predictor.

Looks has a minimal impact at best

 

[Godtis]

It’s tenacity, intelligence and connections that’s the biggest predictor.

Looks has a minimal impact at best

(((connections)))

 

[Snicket]

It’s tenacity, intelligence and connections that’s the biggest predictor.

Looks has a minimal impact at best

Of course. IQ is the greatest inherent predictor by far.
Just challenging these stupid .org users.

 

[Neucher]

What about deepseek ceo

 

[Godtis]

Of course. IQ is the greatest inherent predictor by far.
Just challenging these stupid .org users.

In nature, they would be at the bottom of the food chain because there would be no degrees, no colleges, no PhDs, no money, no cars, no companies, no man-made jobs or whatever to cope with.

 

[Deleted member 120523]

Jewish

 

[Snicket]

In nature, they would be at the bottom of the food chain because there would be no degrees, no colleges, no PhDs, no money, no cars, no companies, no man-made jobs or whatever to cope with.

Vacuously true. We don't live in nature so it's irrelevant.

if you lived in nature, you could have your hand bitten off by a crocodile. Where do we go from there?

 

[StraightHeadJames]

i want to strangle these motherfuckers how the fuck are the goverments allowing this bro it really makes me hate the world even more. what a clown world i mean just the fact taht there's still wars going on on this planet with how much we know shows how we should just nuke it all in one go

now they're making Ais and instead of regulating them they are using it first to replace all creative work like art, music, writing like things that u can appreciate a human's soul put into it.

Sooo bruuutal i mean the only good thing that came out was that it helps with homework Lol i wish chat gpt could somehow just be kept at this level and just stop all the advancements for art and 3d shit but soon enough all this stuff will gain u 0 anything becuz ai is just getting too advanced