
hax
esoteric prob
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2025
- Posts
- 5,237
- Reputation
- 9,469
it has completely lost its meaning: a male whose appearance and behavioural traits are regarded as conventionally feminine, a feminine boy.
i feel like when you talk about femboys now, it's always that same thigh-high, fishnets, fluffy hair, skirt, crop top image that comes to mind...
a (usually skinny) guy wearing any sexualised piece of clothing, making sure the pieces fit tighter and smaller, and forcing a very feminine voice.
ofc there are a lot of them on this earth, but i would argue that most men on this earth are femboys. maybe not conventionally attractive or even aware that they classify in this category, but if we go by the definition, they are subconsciously feminine-looking with no male dimorphism due to all the goyslop and drastic decrease in T over the recent years.
i just hate people that praise or instantly come and hate on the sexualised version of men without knowing the true meaning, only what the mainstream media shoves down ppl's throats.
i feel like when you talk about femboys now, it's always that same thigh-high, fishnets, fluffy hair, skirt, crop top image that comes to mind...
a (usually skinny) guy wearing any sexualised piece of clothing, making sure the pieces fit tighter and smaller, and forcing a very feminine voice.
ofc there are a lot of them on this earth, but i would argue that most men on this earth are femboys. maybe not conventionally attractive or even aware that they classify in this category, but if we go by the definition, they are subconsciously feminine-looking with no male dimorphism due to all the goyslop and drastic decrease in T over the recent years.
i just hate people that praise or instantly come and hate on the sexualised version of men without knowing the true meaning, only what the mainstream media shoves down ppl's throats.