Why are non dimorphic pretty boy tiktoker considered as GL ?

[Bechadish]

It's a legit question that i ask myself and i would really like to find a good answer because otherwise PSL is cope basically.
I'm talking about boneless tiktok prettyboy, with not chad eye area.
Not any single valuable dimorphism, peanut skull - helping therefore having a more compact midface.

Imo the explanation that i can have - but still making PSL cope because they get more validation than your PSL giga chad- are :
- Phenotype
- collagen/hair quality
- coloring.
- compact midface - but who cares on a peanut skull ?

and the rest is mainly feminine features, even the soft features, therefore not dimorphic.

@Lifewasted
@OwlGod
@BigBiceps
@Alarico8
@ArabIncel

Does it means that there is not such a thing as "objective beauty" ?

 

[turkproducer]

only for younger teenage girls

incel once they are 20

 

[SuicideBomber]

Masculinity = not realted to attraction unless you jus thave feminine traits in your face.

 

[Deleted member 2846]

they’re prettyboys. younger girls love them. they are very aesthetic to look at. younger girls like them bc they don’t need a dom chad to protect her yet so the younger girls go after males with peacock features which works as status for her (look i have the most aesthetic mate). and generally bc girls don’t like masculinity or dom bc they find males their age attractive first (like how u found middle schoolers to be attractive when u were in middle school).

 

[Bechadish]

Masculinity = not realted to attraction unless you jus thave feminine traits in your face.

you mean that dimorphism is not related to attractivity ?

only for younger teenage girls

incel once they are 20

I don't know if it's true or if we PSLer are coping with this expire time.

they’re prettyboys. younger girls love them. they are very aesthetic to look at. younger girls like them bc they don’t need a dom chad to protect her yet so the younger girls go after males with peacock features which works as status for her (look i have the most aesthetic mate). and generally bc girls don’t like masculinity or dom bc they find males their age attractive first (like how u found middle schoolers to be attractive when u were in middle school).

Makes sense.
My opinion was that due to more estrogen exposition, our mind has to adapt to these feminine men.
Look at 18 yo boy of 30 years ago, they look way more dominant than young men of today.
And that, women are more and more attracted to women, meaning that at a younger age at least, they tend to be bisexual, and these "men" are the best compromise.

 

[SuicideBomber]

you mean that dimorphism is not related to attractivity ?

I don't know if it's true or if we PSLer are coping with this expire time.

You can be ultra masculine looking and still ugly. You can be ultra feminine looking and gl, just because of your features. But women will not be attracted to you on a sexual level. I really think past the age of 25 women dont care anymore about aesthetics that much, they just want a
dimorphic male, to protect their offspring. Aesthetics are just a bonus in that.

 

[Bechadish]

You can be ultra masculine looking and still ugly. You can be ultra feminine looking and gl, just because of your features. But women will not be attracted to you on a sexual level. I really think past the age of 25 women dont care anymore about aesthetics that much, they just want a
dimorphic male, to protect their offspring. Aesthetics are just a bonus in that.

I agree that past 20s women are more looking into a High Prenatal T.
But i was never denying that looking like an australoid or a nendertal was a bad thing - unless back then.
You need a good mix of both : But still, more Dimorphism than none. A man without a strong browridge or chin is probably low prenatal T and won't be seen as masculine or maesthetic.
All the "gods" of PSL have both feminine and masculine features, but still way more dimorphic ones.

The issue with these "tiktoker", at least some, is that they have 0 masculine features by their own, thus looking more like a female than a male.

 

[SuicideBomber]

I agree that past 20s women are more looking into a High Prenatal T.
But i was never denying that looking like an australoid or a nendertal was a bad thing - unless back then.
You need a good mix of both : But still, more Dimorphism than none. A man without a strong browridge or chin is probably low prenatal T and won't be seen as masculine or maesthetic.
All the "gods" of PSL have both feminine and masculine features, but still way more dimorphic ones.

The issue with these "tiktoker", at least some, is that they have 0 masculine features by their own, thus looking more like a female than a male.

Thats why thell end up in the dump once theyre over 25.

 

[diggbicc]

All these prettyboys will be incel at 25 and beyond

 

[Bechadish]

Thats why thell end up in the dump once theyre over 25.

tbh women too, past 20s looks old asf, especially due to estrogen exposition.

 

[Deleted member 656]

Simply put they aren't non-dimorphic

Usually very skinny / lean - proven to be in the eyes of women a more dimorphic trait than muscularity. Theoretically a woman could be big. A woman can't get sub 10% body fat, she'd probably die.

Typically angular, another dimorphic male trait. We tend to have sharper features, sharper eyes, sharper cheekbones, sharper jaws.

Typically have excellent bone placement if not mass. High zygos, wide jaws, straight or button noses.

Combine all that with incredible health indicators like very good hair, very good skin, top tier colouring and all and it all makes perfect sense.

 

[Deleted member 773]

It’s collagen. Collagen matters more than bones.

 

[Bechadish]

Simply put they aren't non-dimorphic

Usually very skinny / lean - proven to be in the eyes of women a more dimorphic trait than muscularity. Theoretically a woman could be big. A woman can't get sub 10% body fat, she'd probably die.

Typically angular, another dimorphic male trait. We tend to have sharper features, sharper eyes, sharper cheekbones, sharper jaws.

Typically have excellent bone placement if not mass. High zygos, wide jaws, straight or button noses.

Combine all that with incredible health indicators like very good hair, very good skin, top tier colouring and all and it all makes perfect sense.

does it means we have to revisit and implement our current PSL criteria?

 

[Pietrosiek]

Usually very skinny / lean - proven to be in the eyes of women a more dimorphic trait than muscularity. Theoretically a woman could be big. A woman can't get sub 10% body fat, she'd probably die.

being higher bf is good for fighting, its weird that its not dimorphic

 

[Deleted member 656]

does it means we have to revisit and implement our current PSL criteria?

No, a balance of masculine and feminine features being attractive, angularity being attractive and health indicators being attractive has been known to PSL for years. There's nothing new about it.

being higher bf is good for fighting, its weird that its not dimorphic

Smaller skulls are also great for fighting

 

[Pietrosiek]

Smaller skulls are also great for fighting

no

 

[Bechadish]

No, a balance of masculine and feminine features being attractive, angularity being attractive and health indicators being attractive has been known to PSL for years. There's nothing new about it.

Smaller skulls are also great for fighting

What do you think about the typical : "prettyboy won't last" either in a boneless approach - they will "meltdown" theorically, is it even true ? - or beeing due to the fact that older women are no more attracted by average or below average dimorphism ?

 

[Deleted member 656]

What do you think about the typical : "prettyboy won't last" either in a boneless approach - they will "meltdown" theorically, is it even true ? - or beeing due to the fact that older women are no more attracted by average or below average dimorphism ?

If you start aging badly, having larger bones will help you. Larger bones will also mean you look better bald. These are mostly non-issues imo bc it's easy to preserve your skin and easy to preserve your hair.

 

[Deleted member 2227]

It's a legit question that i ask myself and i would really like to find a good answer because otherwise PSL is cope basically.
I'm talking about boneless tiktok prettyboy, with not chad eye area.
Not any single valuable dimorphism, peanut skull - helping therefore having a more compact midface.

They are not ANDROGYNOUS males, a AND would looks like the last guy in the right

The prettyboys of Tik Tok are very close to the Mas guy.

So, they have dimorphism and some of them will looks even more Masc as well when older, since Gandy was a prettyboy when young, now DOM asf.

Does it means that there is not such a thing as "objective beauty" ?

No, attractiveness can be explained by biology, is pretty much a science.
Ah, here is the difference between prettyboy and DOM in relationships etc...

Of course, being more masc means that you are more sexy, but you need to be beautiful too (aesthetic), whatever, a too masc guy or DOM would slay too much, and females don't like or go to this (since they need to impregnate, but not only this, they need also a father to carry and care of their children) that's why prettyboys are the most and so famous and also that many GL guys become a bit fat and lose appeal after marriage or a long time in relationship.

So in conclusion I don't see too much difference between them that's is not STM and LTM.


TL;DR

The difference between a Prettyboy and a DOM guy is

Prettyboy = LONG TERM RELATIONSHIPS
DOM = Short Term Relationships (slayer)

Prettyboys can slay too but more about Tinder etc...

younger girls like them bc they don’t need a dom chad to protect her yet

Of course DOM means Domination, so basically a Dominant Male, but a Tall Prettyboy gymaxxed would be dominant too.

What do you think about the typical : "prettyboy won't last" either in a boneless approach - they will "meltdown" theorically, is it even true ?

Gandy was a prettyboy when young.

Makes sense.
My opinion was that due to more estrogen exposition, our mind has to adapt to these feminine men.
Look at 18 yo boy of 30 years ago, they look way more dominant than young men of today.
And that, women are more and more attracted to women, meaning that at a younger age at least, they tend to be bisexual, and these "men" are the best compromise.

Females are not more attracted to fem, they are always BIssexual (but a TRUE Lesbian doesn't exist)

The reason for females not going for DOM all time I already explained, also because DOM Chads are RARE ASF, thats it.