Why did so many high IQ philosophers hate women?

[chadpreetcel123]

fucking brutal

 

[JustLikeAWoman]

Back then, it probably was a normal attitude.

Low IQ people probably had a much worse opinion of women back then.

 

[Zero]

You can write books about the inferiority of women. In the end they are necessary evils for our species to filter out losers in the grand scheme of things, but they're still repulsive beyond sexuality. Someone once said that if men didn't have sex drives, we'd hunt women for sport.

 

[currymax]

philosophy is mad-incel

 

[disillusioned]

In the end they are necessary evils for our species to filter out losers in the grand scheme of things

This is actually total bullshit. Natural selection doesn't apply to human civilization because human civilization is itself an unnatural construct. Before civilization women only wanted large well built chads that could have defended them and done manual labor, but with the advent of complex societies the ruling elites had to create a system the rewarded the most intelligent men (betabuxers) with greater reproductive success so that their civilization could grow stronger, and the only way to do that was by taking the sexual decision making process away from women. Because of this, traditional natural selection simply doesn't work for humans because the traits that women have evolved to want have literally nothing to do with what is desirable for human civilization.

Let that sink in: All of civilization is literally the result of turning women into slaves with no rights. It's literally not possible to even have a civilization at all without sexual slavery. If you are a woman and you actually realized this it would be an epic gigaton atomic blackpill.

 

[Zero]

This is actually total bullshit. Natural selection doesn't apply to human civilization because human civilization is itself an unnatural construct. Before civilization women only wanted large well built chads that could have defended them and done manual labor, but with the advent of complex societies the ruling elites had to create a system the rewarded the most intelligent men (betabuxers) with greater reproductive success so that their civilization could grow stronger, and the only way to do that was by taking the sexual decision making process away from women. Because of this, traditional natural selection simply doesn't work for humans because the traits that women have evolved to want have literally nothing to do with what is desirable for human civilization.

Let that sink in: All of civilization is literally the result of turning women into slaves with no rights. It's literally not possible to even have a civilization at all without sexual slavery. If you are a woman and you actually realized this it would be an epic gigaton atomic blackpill.

I never disagreed with this, I just didn't write about it. With sexual liberation things are reversing back to the chaddest reproducing more, although it's a gradual change because settling down with a beta doesn't just disappear overnight. Some women are capable of locking down chads, but a lot of women are just losers who just have to choose for beta sperm or death of their bloodline thanks to slutting around and forgetting the biological clock. Some of these losing women (10% I've read) are redpilled and machiavellian enough to cuck the betas in secret with chad's sperm though.

 

[xit]

Back then, it probably was a normal attitude.

Low IQ people probably had a much worse opinion of women back then.

keep coping

women are indeed inferior

 

[Deleted member 1476]

Nietzsche would have written beyond good and evil in a pornhub comment section if he was alive today

 

[haircutcel]

This is actually total bullshit. Natural selection doesn't apply to human civilization because human civilization is itself an unnatural construct. Before civilization women only wanted large well built chads that could have defended them and done manual labor, but with the advent of complex societies the ruling elites had to create a system the rewarded the most intelligent men (betabuxers) with greater reproductive success so that their civilization could grow stronger, and the only way to do that was by taking the sexual decision making process away from women. Because of this, traditional natural selection simply doesn't work for humans because the traits that women have evolved to want have literally nothing to do with what is desirable for human civilization.

Let that sink in: All of civilization is literally the result of turning women into slaves with no rights. It's literally not possible to even have a civilization at all without sexual slavery. If you are a woman and you actually realized this it would be an epic gigaton atomic blackpill.

what is it? do good genetics come in a package and are chads mostly higher iq than incels? or does society need to force women to fuck high iq incels? because you’ve claimed both of these things

 

[Mayorga]

human civilization is itself an unnatural construct

In what sense is it an unnatural construct when it has been the product of the natural development of humankind?

 

[GenericChad1444]

Luckily these sexist beliefs are stuck in the past now.

 

[xit]

In what sense is it an unnatural construct when it has been the product of the natural development of humankind?

exactly. @disillusioned is a psuedo intellectual faggot and should rope asap

 

[disillusioned]

Some women are capable of locking down chads, but a lot of women are just losers who just have to choose for beta sperm or death of their bloodline thanks to slutting around and forgetting the biological clock.

It's even worse than this. Despite what most conservacopers think women don't give a shit about children. Most high IQ women just use birth control and don't even have kids. Most kids in the west today are born by accident or outside of permanent relations. In the feminist shithole I live in (Iceland) something like 80+% of children are born to mothers who aren't even married. So not only are women targeting inferior males, but the ones most likely to actually get pregnant are also the ones most likely to accidentally shit out some low IQ fucktrophy.

 

[Deleted member 1862]

Nietzsche would have written beyond good and evil in a pornhub comment section if he was alive today

ubermensch's me

 

[xit]

‏‏‎ ‎

 

[disillusioned]

In what sense is it an unnatural construct when it has been the product of the natural development of humankind?

exactly. @disillusioned is a psuedo intellectual faggot and should rope asap

It is unnatural because civilization cannot exist if humanity's natural sexual selection process is allowed to exist. By default the 80/20 rule prevents any complex society from happening, because the majority of males are left with no real reason to give a shit about anything. The reason most men historically were willing to work and/or fight for the benefit of their communities is because they had families to feed and pussy to obtain. Take that away and men become apathetic and stop giving shit, causing civilization to fall into pieces. This is why for virtually all of human history conservative sexual and family values were FORCED on the population by the ruling elites in order to insure that this would not happen. This is not natural. And because civilization itself requires the existence of this unnatural form of sexual regulation, civilization itself is also not natural.

 

[xit]

It is unnatural because civilization cannot exist if humanity's natural sexual selection process is allowed to exist. By default the 80/20 rule prevents any complex society from happening, because the majority of males are left with no real reason to give a shit about anything. The reason most men historically were willing to work and/or fight for the benefit of their communities is because they had families to feed and pussy to obtain. Take that away and men become apathetic and stop giving shit, causing civilization to fall into pieces. This is why for virtually all of human history conservative sexual and family values were FORCED on the population by the ruling elites in order to insure that this would not happen. This is not natural. And because civilization itself requires the existence of this unnatural form of sexual regulation, civilization itself is also not natural.

didnt read cause i know its simply nonsense.

 

[Mayorga]

It is unnatural because civilization cannot exist if humanity's natural sexual selection process is allowed to exist. By default the 80/20 rule prevents any complex society from happening, because the majority of males are left with no real reason to give a shit about anything. The reason most men historically were willing to work and/or fight for the benefit of their communities is because they had families to feed and pussy to obtain. Take that away and men become apathetic and stop giving shit, causing civilization to fall into pieces. This is why for virtually all of human history conservative sexual and family values were FORCED on the population by the ruling elites in order to insure that this would not happen. This is not natural. And because civilization itself requires the existence of this unnatural form of sexual regulation, civilization itself is also not natural.

You just draw an arbitrary line between natural and unnatural so that it fits your narrative. Interaction between two natural things( say humans and surroundings) results in a natural product. Society has not been given to us by some civilization that developed in another Universe with different physical laws. If a carbon-based life form has invented it, its natural.

 

[Cali Yuga]

Women are dumb and dont care about philosophy

if youre a genius IQ philosopher most women are going to be unable to communicate with you meaningfully

you still desire women and require them for happiness and fulfillment, though, so you're effectively chained to the rocks Andromeda style


also everyone hated women before like 100 years ago, same with antisemitism.

 

[Pietrosiek]

becouse they're high iq? all cucks are low iq.

 

[Deleted member 245]

Nobody who understands female nature has a high opinion of women.

 

[Deleted member 2846]

Nobody who understands female nature has a high opinion of women.

you either don’t understand women and are a cuck or understand women and are a misogynist.

 

[Amnesia]

Women aren't even fully sentient

 

[Deleted member 2846]

Women aren't even fully sentient

“Bachelorette Contestant seen posting misogynistic comments on internet forum”

 

[Amnesia]

“Bachelorette Contestant seen posting misogynistic comments on internet forum”

Exactly why I could never go on that show lol

 

[MammothActuary]

You just draw an arbitrary line between natural and unnatural so that it fits your narrative. Interaction between two natural things( say humans and surroundings) results in a natural product. Society has not been given to us by some civilization that developed in another Universe with different physical laws. If a carbon-based life form has invented it, its natural.

You dont understand. Natural urges are surpressed because we are a civilized society. For example, men have the natural urge to fuck everything that moves but that urge is suppressed for society. Women also have the natural urge to be hypergamous but not only is that urge not surpressed, it is encouraged. That's where the problem lies. Slut shaming and a strong family unit were previously used to surpress the female natural urge but they have been broken down.

 

[Mayorga]

You dont understand. Natural urges are surpressed because we are a civilized society. For example, men have the natural urge to fuck everything that moves but that urge is suppressed for society. Women also have the natural urge to be hypergamous but not only is that urge not surpressed, it is encouraged. That's where the problem lies. Slut shaming and a strong family unit were previously used to surpress the female natural urge but they have been broken down.

I do understand, his wording is poor though, it implies that civilization is somehow unnatural(?). Was it brought to us from a different Universe or something?

 

[FatJattMofo]

cant stop laughing at this one

 

[Deleted member 685]

You just draw an arbitrary line between natural and unnatural so that it fits your narrative. Interaction between two natural things( say humans and surroundings) results in a natural product. Society has not been given to us by some civilization that developed in another Universe with different physical laws. If a carbon-based life form has invented it, its natural.

So true

View attachment 131634

cant stop laughing at this one

Based pietrosiekie

 

[disillusioned]

You dont understand. Natural urges are surpressed because we are a civilized society. For example, men have the natural urge to fuck everything that moves but that urge is suppressed for society. Women also have the natural urge to be hypergamous but not only is that urge not surpressed, it is encouraged. That's where the problem lies. Slut shaming and a strong family unit were previously used to surpress the female natural urge but they have been broken down.

THIS. These dumbfucks don't understand shit and probably have an IQ somewhere in the 80's.

I do understand, his wording is poor though, it implies that civilization is somehow unnatural(?). Was it brought to us from a different Universe or something?

It's unnatural because if natural human urges were simply allowed to reign free of any restriction then civilization would not be able to exist. Civilization is an artificial construct because it's existence hinges on a small group of men being able to use force to bully everybody else into going along with the social rules required for it to function. Civilization can't exist without an authoritarian government, which btw is why China will soon dominate the world after the west collapses,