Why do ethnics speak so loud to each other

autistic_tendencies

autistic_tendencies

Charisma Charm and Personality
Joined
Jul 13, 2019
Posts
34,000
Reputation
49,362
In the gym change room it’s just ethnics speaking gibberish and laughing obnoxiously just lol
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: iblamexyz, looksareeverything5, widdi and 7 others
Zero reply you fall off n
 
  • +1
Reactions: nelts and autistic_tendencies
Genetics
 
  • +1
Reactions: looksareeverything5 and autistic_tendencies
  • +1
Reactions: iluvmilk
In the gym change room it’s just ethnics speaking gibberish and laughing obnoxiously just lol
Oh but btw good thread bc etnics are closer to apes than to white man
 
  • +1
Reactions: lower caste jew
  • +1
Reactions: John6Enjoyer and xevuxia
In the gym change room it’s just ethnics speaking gibberish and laughing obnoxiously just lol
Oh yeah next time they will whisper so they don’t hurt your ears princess
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Primalsplit, BeanletMogger, John6Enjoyer and 1 other person
  • +1
Reactions: John6Enjoyer
I hope so fucking annoying
You want a explanation for why people talk loud in a changing room well here you go maybe just maybe you’re in a locker room that reimburses sound differently to the point where it echoes and gives the illusion that the talking is louder than it actually is of course it often gets even louder when multiple people are talking plus generalization is a sign of low iq
 
You want a explanation for why people talk loud in a changing room well here you go maybe just maybe you’re in a locker room that reimburses sound differently to the point where it echoes and gives the illusion that the talking is louder than it actually is of course it often gets even louder when multiple people are talking plus generalization is a sign of low iq
I think we found an offended ethnic man
 
You want a explanation for why people talk loud in a changing room well here you go maybe just maybe you’re in a locker room that reimburses sound differently to the point where it echoes and gives the illusion that the talking is louder than it actually is of course it often gets even louder when multiple people are talking plus generalization is a sign of low iq
Dnr ethnic cope
 
I think you found someone who actually put together a logical response and you’re just shutting down mentally
"Generalizing is low iq" is a low iq statement.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Primalsplit
Ok then prove your statement of ethic = loud :lul: no logic it’s ok
You want me to take videos in public? That's ridiculous

Here the proof:
 
Ok then prove your statement of ethic = loud :lul: no logic it’s ok
IMG 8322
 
You want me to take videos in public? That's ridiculous

Here the proof:

Generalization :lul: couldn’t prove my point any better this is like reading about Jeffry dahmer and then assuming all white people do that nasty shit
 
Generalization :lul: couldn’t prove my point any better this is like reading about Jeffry dahmer and then assuming all white people do that nasty shit
Well that would be an accurate generalztion, because just about every serial killer IS A WHITE MALE :lul:

You're fucking retarded
 
Cuz they are animals
 
Well that would be an accurate generalztion, because just about every serial killer IS A WHITE MALE :lul:

You're fucking retarded
LOL well then would it be logical to assume you’re a serial killer too? You’re white aren’t you?
 
LOL well then would it be logical to assume you’re a serial killer too? You’re white aren’t you?
Holy low iq

It's "GENERALLY" true that every serial killer is white

That's what a generalization is you single digit iq cretin ethnic
 
  • +1
Reactions: autistic_tendencies
Holy low iq

It's "GENERALLY" true that every serial killer is white

That's what a generalization is you single digit iq cretin ethnic
Duhh you’re literally discovering the fallacies in your own argument bud :lul:that was an analogy framing your thinking
 
Duhh you’re literally discovering the fallacies in your own argument bud :lul:that was an analogy framing your thinking
It was a bad analogy

You literally described generalization as the opposite of generalization

"So you think every white man is a serial killer?"

Holy low iq, no I said generally every serial killer is white

You got my claim wrong, and misunderstood what generalization even means

Below sentient

I'm ignoring you after your next retarded rebuttal as you're not worth my time.
 
It was a bad analogy

You literally described generalization as the opposite of generalization

"So you think every white man is a serial killer?"

Holy low iq, no I said generally every serial killer is white

You got my claim wrong, and misunderstood what generalization even means

Below sentient

I'm ignoring you after your next retarded rebuttal as you're not worth my time.
Perfect. Rejecting the analogy and resorting the insults doesn’t address the underlying fallacy in your generalization and it’s fine if you don’t want to respond but observers can obviously see who has more logic in every argument:lul::lul: versus who responds emotionally the more you reject my argument the more it dissolves your own as it’s your own logic
It was a bad analogy

You literally described generalization as the opposite of generalization

"So you think every white man is a serial killer?"

Holy low iq, no I said generally every serial killer is white

You got my claim wrong, and misunderstood what generalization even means

Below sentient

I'm ignoring you after your next retarded rebuttal as you're not worth my time.
Perfect. Rejecting the analogy and resorting the insults doesn’t address the underlying fallacy in your generalization and it’s fine if you don’t want to respond but observers can obviously see who has more logic in every argument :lul:versus who responds emotionally the more you reject my argument the more it dissolves your own as it’s your own logic:ogre::ogre:
 
Perfect. Rejecting the analogy and resorting the insults doesn’t address the underlying fallacy in your generalization and it’s fine if you don’t want to respond but observers can obviously see who has more logic in every argument:lul::lul: versus who responds emotionally the more you reject my argument the more it dissolves your own as it’s your own logic

Perfect. Rejecting the analogy and resorting the insults doesn’t address the underlying fallacy in your generalization and it’s fine if you don’t want to respond but observers can obviously see who has more logic in every argument :lul:versus who responds emotionally the more you reject my argument the more it dissolves your own as it’s your own logic:ogre::ogre:
Double reply :lul: I’ll also use this time to ask you if you want to concede :unsure:
 
Double reply :lul: I’ll also use this time to ask you if you want to concede :unsure:
you already lost the debate when you said "so you think every white man is a serial killer" and showed how stupid you are, ignore now.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: autistic_tendencies
you already lost the debate when you said "so you think every white man is a serial killer" and showed how stupid you are, ignore now.
LOL LOOK AT THAT I guess your mind truly couldn’t let you make a stupid statement and just leave it there for everyone to see huh? I thought you weren’t replying to me? And if you can’t already grasp that I use that in the way of showing how generalization makes no sense then you’re ready lost far before:lul: again wanna concede?
 
No logical explanation
 

Similar threads

lastredeemer
Replies
19
Views
232
Klasik616
Klasik616
Bruce_Ugly
Replies
2
Views
49
slaters
slaters
bottleofwater
Replies
10
Views
158
autistic_tendencies
autistic_tendencies
N
Replies
22
Views
514
autistic_tendencies
autistic_tendencies

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top