
Vermilioncore
tormented by fear
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2019
- Posts
- 78,764
- Reputation
- 149,554
I understand that literal children (up until age 15) is wrong, but you’re telling me a grown ass women age 16 who is old enough to drive a car, have a job, and has tits and hair on her pussy already, isn’t “adult” enough to reject a man?
Now, this isn’t about non consensual relationships, this is about consensual.
If a slut is under 18 and (ages 16-17) and makes a decision to have sex with a man that’s an adult, the man shouldn’t go to jail or be apprehended. The woman made a conscious decision to do what she did. If anything, SHE should be arrested.
I look at it this way. If a 16 or 17 year old female was approached by some ugly short bald homeless man, she’d obviously say no to him. But if some tall Chad approached, she’d say yes.
How is she not “adult” enough, when she shows clear indications of looks bias?
Now, this isn’t about non consensual relationships, this is about consensual.
If a slut is under 18 and (ages 16-17) and makes a decision to have sex with a man that’s an adult, the man shouldn’t go to jail or be apprehended. The woman made a conscious decision to do what she did. If anything, SHE should be arrested.
I look at it this way. If a 16 or 17 year old female was approached by some ugly short bald homeless man, she’d obviously say no to him. But if some tall Chad approached, she’d say yes.
How is she not “adult” enough, when she shows clear indications of looks bias?