Why do ppl shit on having a more compact midface ratio nowadays?

yeeyeeass69

yeeyeeass69

Master
Joined
Jun 1, 2025
Posts
1,555
Reputation
861
1.0 - 1.1 midface ratio used to be considered ideal but now apparently having long horse midface ratio is better? And more masculine apparently?

My eme angle and esr are already just barely ideal bruh 50-51° eme angle depending on photo :feelswhy::feelswhy:
 
tall skull is more prettyboy and caucasian. notice how white ppl have narrower faces and blacks + east asians all have wide faces? is an overly wide ethnic face really ideal?

i think a tall skull like this is ideal, his skull is also not that narrow so it isn't horse tier or anything
1756783653713

studies back up what im saying btw...
1756783725742
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bryce and Orka
Compact midface isn't ideal and the only examples of a "compact midface" are cherrypicked to no end, get someone with elite facial features who just so happens to have a compact midface and then act like that accounts for everyone with a compact midface, reality is that 99% of people with compact midfaces look like retarded dwarves
 
  • +1
Reactions: Orka and mogs me
tall skull is more prettyboy and caucasian. notice how white ppl have narrower faces and blacks + east asians all have wide faces? is an overly wide ethnic face really ideal?

i think a tall skull like this is ideal, his skull is also not that narrow so it isn't horse tier or anything
View attachment 4075277
studies back up what im saying btw...
View attachment 4075281
This dude in botton just is leaner in first pic

But yeah tall skull is good i feel like fwhr matters more tho

Would u say a 1.0 midface ratio with 1.9 FWHR is good?
 
  • +1
Reactions: DonaldJTrump
tall skull is more prettyboy and caucasian. notice how white ppl have narrower faces and blacks + east asians all have wide faces? is an overly wide ethnic face really ideal?

i think a tall skull like this is ideal, his skull is also not that narrow so it isn't horse tier or anything
View attachment 4075277
studies back up what im saying btw...
View attachment 4075281
Chico mfr is like 0.92 in this photo
 
This dude in botton just is leaner in first pic

But yeah tall skull is good i feel like fwhr matters more tho

Would u say a 1.0 midface ratio with 1.9 FWHR is good?
Its fine, not too wide or narrow. Maybe it could be slightly taller. I think maybe around 1.8 FWHR and 0.95-1.0 midface ratio might be ideal…
 
Its fine, not too wide or narrow. Maybe it could be slightly taller. I think maybe around 1.8 FWHR and 0.95-1.0 midface ratio might be ideal…
Tbh my skull is pretty tall i think and i can make it look taller with proper hair

Any way to get closer to those proportions?
 
Compact midface isn't ideal and the only examples of a "compact midface" are cherrypicked to no end, get someone with elite facial features who just so happens to have a compact midface and then act like that accounts for everyone with a compact midface, reality is that 99% of people with compact midfaces look like retarded dwarves
Probably the most ignorant statement to come from you. Either you've devolved into a horse coper or you're only considering extremes when referring to "compact midface"

Like this individual who literally has a clinical case of Short Face Syndrome:

1756795381202


Chico mfr is like 0.92 in this photo
His midface is 1.02 in this picture lol. It's probably the best you can get midface wise, perfectly compact

0.96-1.08ish is ideal, it's just the new Greycel TikTokers coming in and making their own definitions to cope
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: yeeyeeass69
Probably the most ignorant statement to come from you. Either you've devolved into a horse coper or you're only considering extremes when referring to "compact midface"

Like this individual who literally has a clinical case of Short Face Syndrome:

View attachment 4075551


His midface is 1.02 in this picture lol. It's probably the best you can get midface wise, perfectly compact

0.96-1.08ish is ideal, it's just the new Greycel TikTokers coming in and making their own definitions to cope
So no need for surgeries or filler or wtv to fix harmony if i have 1.04-1.05 mfr, 50° eme angle, 1.9 fwhr?
 
Probably the most ignorant statement to come from you. Either you've devolved into a horse coper or you're only considering extremes when referring to "compact midface"

Like this individual who literally has a clinical case of Short Face Syndrome:

View attachment 4075551


His midface is 1.02 in this picture lol. It's probably the best you can get midface wise, perfectly compact

0.96-1.08ish is ideal, it's just the new Greycel TikTokers coming in and making their own definitions to cope
Esr is around 0.475 which is outside ideal :feelswhy:
 
1.0 - 1.1 midface ratio used to be considered ideal but now apparently having long horse midface ratio is better? And more masculine apparently?

My eme angle and esr are already just barely ideal bruh 50-51° eme angle depending on photo :feelswhy::feelswhy:
harder to look lean facially if ur face is compact compared to horse face
 
Tbh my skull is pretty tall i think and i can make it look taller with proper hair

Any way to get closer to those proportions?
Your facial width and length is not the issue. If you want a taller skull then have a haircut that shows your forehead. Getting a tall chin and a big lower third/ramus in general is ideal too… I would only worry if your midface ratio is over 1.1 or maybe 1.05 and if your FWHR is over 2 or maybe 2.1 AT most or something…
 
Horse cope
0.98 to 1.05 is as perfect as it can get.
Anything less than 0.98 usually looks too long
 

Similar threads

Error404
Replies
12
Views
2K
tjapabaas
T
NVM_Ignacio
Replies
43
Views
5K
NVM_Ignacio
NVM_Ignacio
menas
Replies
247
Views
47K
fodenglazer
F
TheBlackpilledOne
Replies
5
Views
356
IWANTTOHELPEVERYONE
IWANTTOHELPEVERYONE

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top