Why does Sean O'Pry's side profile change in different photos

O'Pry

O'Pry

It's Sean O from Kennesaw Georgia
Joined
Mar 9, 2024
Posts
462
Reputation
1,180
In the first photo, he has very poor forward growth and bad jawline visibility... so bad that it makes me question how he can do runway modelling where all sides of his head are visible at all time.

Bad


The second photo his gonial angle has significantly reduced and has a great jawline

Good
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 85236 and Deleted member 115294
In the first photo, he has very poor forward growth and bad jawline visibility... so bad that it makes me question how he can do runway modelling where all sides of his head are visible at all time.

View attachment 3607960

The second photo his gonial angle has significantly reduced and has a great jawline

View attachment 3607966
first pic is ropefuel for 99% of people, not many people look good at that angle
 
  • +1
Reactions: diditeverbegin and Deleted member 85236
1 pic:looks down
2 pic:looks up
 
Different posture. Nobody looks good in that first photo’s angle + he’s looking down so his jawline won’t be as visible. These are 2 pics of Chico and Jordan in the same angle and their sides don’t look as good. It looks like they have zero forward growth and poor facial definition, but in reality it’s the exact opposite. The first pic is the reason why people think Chico’s side isn’t good, but there are countless other photos where it looks great, same for Jordan and Sean
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2511.jpeg
    IMG_2511.jpeg
    42.1 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_1975.png
    IMG_1975.png
    512.4 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: diditeverbegin
they all have significant mandibular protrusion even at that angle

some people look like this however:

Zenith-Weak-jaw-1-640x790.jpg

i-keep-doubting-wether-i-should-even-try-i-might-just-have-v0-itxjwi8f025b1.jpg

weak-jawline-procedures-v0-b2qik0lxj9cc1.png
 
  • +1
Reactions: CurseKing35

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top