incel194012940
Kraken
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2021
- Posts
- 8,321
- Reputation
- 13,855
it's not because "good genes come in a package"
its mostly because of 4 reasons:
1. if you are here you have probably lost 10000+ hours of your life on depression, high cortisol, generally having your brain totally wrecked and being forced to LDAR in video game or something2 until you sort of recover. That's why I always considered productivity optimizing to some extent a cope. Video games, media, porn etc ARE copes. But they don't understand why the subhuman man needed to cope in the first place. If you didn't have those negative experiences in first place, rejection, bullying, moron/abusive family, that time could have been invested into something. Perhaps just chilling and enjoying life but if endowed with any sort of ambition/talent, to very substantial accomplisments.
2. High IQ subhumans generally have autistic-level hyper focus into some field. This is because as a subhuman, their ego gets attached to their work because they "don't feel like they're good enough" (a psychologist gaslight term because that internal voice is correct). Basically they substitute their work for their subhuman looks. A good looking person is more likely to feel an internal sense of peace and security that enables both having wide spanning, natural (from curiosity, not insecuirty) interests, as well as sustaining them because their looks will act as a substitute for impressive talent. Just look at what a mogger musician can do, just lip sync, vs the extremely impressive technical features required for a subhuman to get the same praise.
3. Bad looks and stupidity are extremely related to stunting factors such as abuse, malnutrition, mothers use of drugs during gestation, and exposure to toxic factors such as lead. Good looks and intelligence are somewhat related but you can only reach a certain potential. Not everyone can be chad but everyone can get cancer and die basically.
4. Racism/lookism. "looking smart" ie, phenotypic, cultural, and status indicating traits are much more important in guaging intelligence than actual intelligence ("g factor"). I guarentee you that you'd consider a 130 iq african american who speaks like a thug less intelligent than 105 iq Clavicular type wasp who lives in a stone house.
its mostly because of 4 reasons:
1. if you are here you have probably lost 10000+ hours of your life on depression, high cortisol, generally having your brain totally wrecked and being forced to LDAR in video game or something2 until you sort of recover. That's why I always considered productivity optimizing to some extent a cope. Video games, media, porn etc ARE copes. But they don't understand why the subhuman man needed to cope in the first place. If you didn't have those negative experiences in first place, rejection, bullying, moron/abusive family, that time could have been invested into something. Perhaps just chilling and enjoying life but if endowed with any sort of ambition/talent, to very substantial accomplisments.
2. High IQ subhumans generally have autistic-level hyper focus into some field. This is because as a subhuman, their ego gets attached to their work because they "don't feel like they're good enough" (a psychologist gaslight term because that internal voice is correct). Basically they substitute their work for their subhuman looks. A good looking person is more likely to feel an internal sense of peace and security that enables both having wide spanning, natural (from curiosity, not insecuirty) interests, as well as sustaining them because their looks will act as a substitute for impressive talent. Just look at what a mogger musician can do, just lip sync, vs the extremely impressive technical features required for a subhuman to get the same praise.
3. Bad looks and stupidity are extremely related to stunting factors such as abuse, malnutrition, mothers use of drugs during gestation, and exposure to toxic factors such as lead. Good looks and intelligence are somewhat related but you can only reach a certain potential. Not everyone can be chad but everyone can get cancer and die basically.
4. Racism/lookism. "looking smart" ie, phenotypic, cultural, and status indicating traits are much more important in guaging intelligence than actual intelligence ("g factor"). I guarentee you that you'd consider a 130 iq african american who speaks like a thug less intelligent than 105 iq Clavicular type wasp who lives in a stone house.
