Why is a woman allowed to have rape fantasies but a man is not allowed to have them?

[Aladin]

I really wanna find a hot bitch walking down a street alone, run out from the alley, grab her by her tight dress, slam her on the ground, and go to town. The adrenaline rush of the frantic sex with be so exhilarating that I’ll thrusting at giga high speeds in the same way her pussy gets wet at high speeds. Then we’ll both get intense orgasms and an amazing memory for our futures. What’s wrong with that fantasy? it’s all in Minecraft.

 

[Vermilioncore]

Because men are the enemy of this world

 

[Dr. Bludy]

Because we men are the villains

 

[Pendejo]

Because a woman fantasizing about being raped means she would consent to it, meanwhile in the scenario of a man fantasizing about rape the girl is not consenting to it.

Now I wonder, would you want any of your female relatives to be raped on the street against their will?

 

[LooksOrDeath]

Because a woman fantasizing about being raped means she would consent to it, meanwhile in the scenario of a man fantasizing about rape the girl is not consenting to it.

Now I wonder, would you want any of your female relatives to be raped on the street against their will?

There's no man who wouldn't consent to raping a willing woman

 

[Aladin]

Because a woman fantasizing about being raped means she would consent to it, meanwhile in the scenario of a man fantasizing about rape the girl is not consenting to it.

No if gets raped she didn’t consent to it. Holy shit do you even know what rape means?

Now I wonder, would you want any of your female relatives to be raped on the street against their will?

Why are they walking outside without a strong male chaperone?

 

[BigJimsWornOutTires]

I really wanna find a hot bitch walking down a street alone, run out from the alley, grab her by her tight dress, slam her on the ground, and go to town. The adrenaline rush of the frantic sex with be so exhilarating that I’ll thrusting at giga high speeds in the same way her pussy gets wet at high speeds. Then we’ll both get intense orgasms and an amazing memory for our futures. What’s wrong with that fantasy? it’s all in Minecraft.

Uh. So let me get this straight here. After you slam her on the ground, you leave and go to town?

Like,

?

 

[Aladin]

Uh. So let me get this straight here. After you slam her on the ground, you leave and go to town?

Like,

Don’t play dumb. Use context clues or just kill yourself.

 

[BigJimsWornOutTires]

Don’t play dumb. Use context clues or just kill yourself.

Why you have to act like a faggot all the time, sis?

 

[Kamui]

Because a woman fantasizing about being raped means she would consent to it, meanwhile in the scenario of a man fantasizing about rape the girl is not consenting to it.

Now I wonder, would you want any of your female relatives to be raped on the street against their will?

This, rough sex ≠ rape, foids want to be raped by Chads not subhumans lmao

 

[Aladin]

This, rough sex ≠ rape, foids want to be raped by Chads not subhumans lmao

No one said anything about rough sex. That’s consensual, rape is not consensual.

 

[Pendejo]

No if gets raped she didn’t consent to it. Holy shit do you even know what rape means?

She didn’t give explicit consent, but she fantasized about it so deep down she actually wanted it to happen.

Why are they walking outside without a strong male chaperone?

Well hopefully they live in a civilized country where they can go outside on their own and where people won’t shift the blame to them if they get raped.

Anyway what if they immobilize him and rape her in front of his face, then what? Answer the question.

 

[The Grinch]

Zero shit thread

 

[Aladin]

She didn’t give explicit consent, but she fantasized about it so deep down she actually wanted it to happen.

No, that’s bullshit double think mental gymnastics. It’s rape.

Well hopefully they live in a civilized country where they can go outside on their own and where people won’t shift the blame to them if they get raped.

Anyway what if they inmovilize him and rape her in front of his face, then what? Answer the question.

Tbh wouldn’t care. Probably were whoring around dressed slutty at a club abusing drugs in a “civilized country.”

 

[Pendejo]

No, that’s bullshit double think mental gymnastics. It’s rape.

Yeah, it’s rape but she wanted to get raped, I think it’s not that difficult to understand.

Tbh wouldn’t care. Probably were whoring around dressed slutty at a club abusing drugs in a “civilized country.”

So if your very own mother got raped you would make absurd assumptions to justify the rapist actions? Based as fuck bro!

And in case you didn’t know women get raped even when they are fully clothed, lol if you think some clothes are gonna stop rabid indians from raping your whore mother.

 

[Deleted member 18582]

No, that’s bullshit double think mental gymnastics. It’s rape.

No that's just extremely rough consensual sex. You just insist on using the word rape to describe it for hyperbolic effect.

 

[Aladin]

Yeah, it’s rape but she wanted to get raped, I think it’s not that difficult to understand.

That doesn’t contradict what I said at all. She wants the rape but it lacks consent.

So if your very own mother got raped you would make absurd assumptions to justify the rapist actions? Based as fuck bro!

I wouldn’t justify the actions at all I just wouldn’t care. If you leave your keys in the car and someone steals it, you brought it upon yourself. Holy shit you have poor reading comprehension of what I said.

And in case you didn’t know women get raped even when they are fully clothed, lol if you think some clothes are gonna stop rabid indians from raping your whore mother.

Yeah when they’re in dangerous places. Women belong in the home.

 

[Reformed]

Women wanting rape is basically just a dominant man taking control over them. Women don’t actually wanna be raped by a sub5

 

[Aladin]

No that's just extremely rough consensual sex. You just insist on using the word rape to describe it for hyperbolic effect.

No it’s not, it’s rape because there is resistance by the woman, rough consensual sex would be BDSM.

 

[Pendejo]

No that's just extremely rough consensual sex. You just insist on using the word rape to describe it for hyperbolic effect.

Tbh that would hold no weight if the girl decided to press charges, but yeah in theory it wouldn’t be rape.

 

[Deleted member 18582]

No it’s not, it’s rape because there is resistance by the woman, rough consensual sex would be BDSM.

Resistance can just as easily be a part of BDSM to make the power dynamic funner

Tbh that would hold no weight if the girl decided to press charges, but yeah in theory it wouldn’t be rape.

I am agreeing with you. women do not fantasize about rape or they wouldn't fantasize about it at all. they fantasize about extremely rough sex with someone hot who wants them more than she wants him, and just call it "rape" to make the fantasy stronger even if it is definitionally not rape at all.

 

[Aladin]

Resistance can just as easily be a part of BDSM to make the power dynamic funner

But BDSM would involve agreement before it happened at all. The rape would come out of nowhere.

I am agreeing with you. women do not fantasize about rape or they wouldn't fantasize about it at all. they fantasize about extremely rough sex with someone hot who wants them more than she wants him, and just call it "rape" to make the fantasy stronger even if it is definitionally not rape at all.

They definitely have fantasized about literal rape. There was a subreddit called r/rapebait

 

[Pendejo]

I wouldn’t justify the actions at all I just wouldn’t care. If you leave your keys in the car and someone steals it, you brought it upon yourself.

You wouldn’t care about your own mother being scarred for life after getting raped because somehow it’s her fault for being outside minding her own business and not the subhuman rapist fault for not knowing how to behave? You telling me that you wouldn’t want to retaliate? Just fucking lol honestly.

Yeah when they’re in dangerous places. Women belong in the home.

If you keep perpetuating the narrative that it’s the women fault for being in a dangerous place and not the rapist fault then all places will continue being dangerous places for them.

 

[tombradylover]

Therapy is needed asap and electric chair shortly thereafter. fatherless behavior

 

[Deleted member 18582]

But BDSM would involve agreement before it happened at all. The rape would come out of nowhere.

By engaging in the fantasy to begin with women are consenting to what happens in the fantasy, which by definition does not make it rape. They can call it whatever they want and it still doesn't change the fact they consciously and consensually entered into the fantasy.

They definitely have fantasized about literal rape. There was a subreddit called r/rapebait

Those women are fantasizing about extremely rough consensual sex with a strong power dynamic and then calling it rape after the fact because to use that word makes them feel even weaker and like the man desires her more than she desires him, which only increases the intensity of the fantasy.

 

[MoggerGaston]

Women are seen as the victims of sex, while men are seen as the perpetrators.

Of course rationally you are entirely right, but the world isnt rational; its anti-male

 

[MoggerGaston]

Because a woman fantasizing about being raped means she would consent to it, meanwhile in the scenario of a man fantasizing about rape the girl is not consenting to it.

Now I wonder, would you want any of your female relatives to be raped on the street against their will?

An adult male having sex with a willing 17yo girl would still be seen as rape in a large part of the world. Because 'she isnt able to consent' or something bs like that. But somehow she can consent to a 17yo boy just fine, because fuck logic.

Rape is just anti-male gibberish. It has lost all its meaning in modern anti-male society.

 

[Aladin]

By engaging in the fantasy to begin with women are consenting to what happens in the fantasy,
which by definition does not make it rape.

Wrong, you’re reaching.

They can call it whatever they want and it still doesn't change the fact they consciously and consensually entered into the fantasy.

Which is entering into a fantasy, not actually getting raped.

Those women are fantasizing about extremely rough consensual sex with a strong power dynamic and then calling it rape after the fact because to use that word makes them feel even weaker and like the man desires her more than she desires him, which only increases the intensity of the fantasy.

Or they actually went out dressed like a slut in the middle of the night seeking to get raped by a stranger, who very well may not even have been Chad.

Women are seen as the victims of sex, while men are seen as the perpetrators.

Of course rationally you are entirely right, but the world isnt rational; its anti-male

bingo

 

[Deleted member 18582]

Wrong, you’re reaching.

Oh ok

 

[Pendejo]

An adult male having sex with a willing 17yo girl would still be seen as rape in a large part of the world. Because 'she isnt able to consent' or something bs like that. But somehow she can consent to a 17yo boy just fine, because fuck logic.

The logic is that younger women are more immature and easily impressionable than older women, if you have talked with jbs you would know this, so it wouldn’t make sense to punish guys their same age since they are just as mentally capable as them, unlike older men which can easily take advantage of them and should know better

If a guy is on his 30s and hasn’t settled down with a girl already, but instead is looking for jbs do you seriously not think there must be something fundamentally wrong with him? Do you think he would be the rightful candidate for a “pure” virgin jb?

But anyway this thread is not about statutory rape so idk why would you even bring up it.

 

[MoggerGaston]

The logic is that younger women are more immature and easily impressionable than older women, if you have talked with jbs you would know this, so it wouldn’t make sense to punish guys their same age since they are just as mentally capable as them, unlike older men which can easily take advantage of them and should know better

This 'logic' doesn't make any sense. 17yo's are either able to consent to sex or not.

If a 17yo girl has sex with a 17yo boy, she is therefore being raped since she is unable to consent. You are only making a case here for the 17yo to be punished less severely for raping a girl, than an adult male would be. Since he is still young and immature.

If a guy is on his 30s and hasn’t settled down with a girl already, but instead is looking for jbs do you seriously not think there must be something fundamentally wrong with him?

No. He was probably just dealt an unfortunate hand in life. Ideally he would've gotten the JB earlier in life, not having to wait untill his 30s.

Do you think he would be the rightful candidate for a “pure” virgin jb?

Whether you 'deserve' something or not, is completely irrelevant in the real world. The world doesn't work like that and neither does the law or should the law.

If life is about 'deserving' things and legislation should be based around that, it would be completely impossible to have any laws at all. There would always be disputes. Why would a 30yo virgin man not deserve a virgin female? Instead chad with n-count 100 'deserves' a virgin girl, since he is more likely to seduce her? Yeah right.

Not to mention that rich people would never agree to any of this, since they never 'deserved' to be born wealthy.

But anyway this thread is not about statutory rape so idk why would you even bring up it.

Because what is considered rape, considered immoral/moral, by modern society's standards is completely retarded and void of any logic.

 

[Aladin]

Oh ok

You are. It’s non consensual. You’re trying to redefine terms, just as when you called “just extremely rough.”

The logic is that younger women are more immature and easily impressionable than older women, if you have talked with jbs you would know this, so it wouldn’t make sense to punish guys their same age since they are just as mentally capable as them, unlike older men which can easily take advantage of them and should know better

If a guy is on his 30s and hasn’t settled down with a girl already, but instead is looking for jbs do you seriously not think there must be something fundamentally wrong with him? Do you think he would be the rightful candidate for a “pure” virgin jb?

But anyway this thread is not about statutory rape so idk why would you even bring up it.

he would be a better candidate than all men mid 20s and below if he’s established money wise.

 

[Deleted member 18582]

You are. It’s non consensual. You’re trying to redefine terms, just as when you called “just extremely rough.”

he would be a better candidate than all men mid 20s and below if he’s established money wise.

Whatever gets you off bro

 

[Aladin]

Whatever gets you off bro

So now you’re gonna give a smug, little backhanded comment.

Go fuck yourself, sore loser.

 

[Pendejo]

This 'logic' doesn't make any sense. 17yo's are either able to consent to sex or not.

If a 17yo girl has sex with a 17yo boy, she is therefore being raped since she is unable to consent. You are only making a case here for the 17yo to be punished less severely for raping a girl, than an adult male would be. Since he is still young and immature.

Ah black and white thinking, peak logic indeed.

If young girls can be easily manipulated by grown ass men then it only makes sense to make laws to prevent this from happening.

No. He was probably just dealt an unfortunate hand in life. Ideally he would've gotten the JB earlier in life, not having to wait untill his 30s.

Whether you 'deserve' something or not, is completely irrelevant in the real world. The world doesn't work like that and neither does the law or should the law.

If life is about 'deserving' things and legislation should be based around that, it would be completely impossible to have any laws at all. There would always be disputes. Why would a 30yo virgin man not deserve a virgin female? Instead chad with n-count 100 'deserves' a virgin girl, since he is more likely to seduce her? Yeah right.

Having been dealt an unfortunate hand in life will usually lead to developing mental issues down the line unfortunately, these guys will probably find themselves in codependent relationships with toxic relationship dynamics and whatnot, at least the chad who didn’t miss out on teen love will be far more likely to be a socially well adjusted person suited for relationships.

And anyway you think all old dudes looking for underage girls are searching for a potential partner? A good amount of them just want to pump and dump and choose to go for jbs since they look good and are easily manipulated.

 

[StuntmanMike]

I really wanna find a hot bitch walking down a street alone, run out from the alley, grab her by her tight dress, slam her on the ground, and go to town. The adrenaline rush of the frantic sex with be so exhilarating that I’ll thrusting at giga high speeds in the same way her pussy gets wet at high speeds. Then we’ll both get intense orgasms and an amazing memory for our futures. What’s wrong with that fantasy? it’s all in Minecraft.

FUCKING THIS.I want to do all the things u wrote.God why god ? Why we live in 21th century ?????? We missed the golden ages of humanity

 

[Aladin]

Ah black and white thinking, peak logic indeed.

If young girls can be easily manipulated by grown ass men then it only makes sense to make laws to prevent this from happening.

You’re delusional if you think they can be “easily manipulated”. They just have lower standards, including lower NT requirements, so you’re just saying an older man has an advantage in longer time developing his social skills where he mogs the teenage boys by default.

 

[New Poster]

Who isn't allowing you to have them? Like 90% of porn is rapey.

 

[Deleted member 18582]

Wrong

@vanillaicecream

 

[Pendejo]

You’re delusional if you think they can be “easily manipulated”. They just have lower standards, including lower NT requirements, so you’re just saying an older man has an advantage in longer time developing his social skills where he mogs the teenage boys by default.

It has nothing to do with that, they just don’t have the mental maturity to detect manipulation most of the time, also even if they don’t want to do something they are more likely to give in than older women cuz of the increased power imbalance

They literally get taken advantage of by oldcel oucasts, but yeah it’s definitely them being more NT than guys their age bro.

 

[MoggerGaston]

Ah black and white thinking, peak logic indeed.

If young girls can be easily manipulated by grown ass men then it only makes sense to make laws to prevent this from happening.

young girls can also easily be 'manipulated' by young men. In fact, that's most likely to occur since they interact more with one another.

Having been dealt an unfortunate hand in life will usually lead to developing mental issues down the line unfortunately, these guys will probably find themselves in codependent relationships with toxic relationship dynamics and whatnot, at least the chad who didn’t miss out on teen love will be far more likely to be a socially well adjusted person suited for relationships.

an inexperienced man is better of with an inexperienced, younger woman, than being manipulated into an abusive sexless beta-bux marriage by an older woman.

There's 2 sides to the story, but you make the fatal mistake that most feminists make: You only care about the woman's interest. Just typical soy simping.
The male's interest and life quality is just as important. But unfortunately you believe that woman are more important than men, a danger to equality and justice.

And anyway you think all old dudes looking for underage girls are searching for a potential partner? A good amount of them just want to pump and dump and choose to go for jbs since they look good and are easily manipulated.

Calling Eugene the 32yo kissless virgin programmer someone who is looking to 'pump n dump' and 'manipulate' is a bit of a far stretch, don't you think?

 

[Aladin]

It has nothing to do with that, they just don’t have the mental maturity to detect manipulation most of the time, also even if they don’t want to do something they are more likely to give in than older women cuz of the increased power imbalance

They literally get taken advantage of by oldcel oucasts, but yeah it’s definitely them being more NT than guys their age bro.

So if a man online messages a JB and says “wanna have sex”, and she agrees, is that manipulation?

 

[Pendejo]

young girls can also easily be 'manipulated' by young men. In fact, that's most likely to occur since they interact more with one another.

Older men have it easier to manipulate them because of the increased power dynamics imbalance, also the guys their age are more immature so obviously they are not subject to the same moral standards as older men.

an inexperienced man is better of with an inexperienced, younger woman, than being manipulated into an abusive sexless beta-bux marriage by an older woman.

There's 2 sides to the story, but you make the fatal mistake that most feminists make: You only care about the woman's interest. Just typical soy simping.
The male's interest and life quality is just as important. But unfortunately you believe that woman are more important than men, a danger to equality and justice.

The difference is that the inexperienced man is a fully adult that should be able to properly navigate through life, if he gets manipulated at that point there’s little that can be done, and to be frank the jb could manipulate him too.

Do you propose to lower the age of consent, abolish it or what? What do you actually want?

Calling Eugene the 32yo kissless virgin programmer someone who is looking to 'pump n dump' and 'manipulate' is a bit of a far stretch, don't you think?

Nope, cuz no every guy that goes for jbs fits that description, you have chads here like Amnesia (who actually experienced teen love btw) with triple digit laycount rambling about jbs.

 

[Pendejo]

So if a man online messages a JB and says “wanna have sex”, and she agrees, is that manipulation?

No, but that’s such an unlikely scenario, most women won’t feel attracted at all to significantly older men unless they have daddy issues, jbs I’ve talked with told me this, and even if they did not all of them would be ok with such a direct aspie approach.

 

[RandomSwan]

nobody stopping you

 

[MoggerGaston]

Older men have it easier to manipulate them because of the increased power dynamics imbalance,

Power dynamics are normal in life. Women actively seek out men that are more powerful than them. More experienced, richer, dominant, confident, older, and so on.

Villainizing power dynamics imbalances is villainizing normal human sexuality. And then again, only punishing men for normal human sexuality. Because as always, women are victims in society's view.

also the guys their age are more immature so obviously they are not subject to the same moral standards as older men.

Yeah so they should be charged with rape then, but given more lenient punishment than adult men. We agree on this.

The difference is that the inexperienced man is a fully adult that should be able to properly navigate through life, if he gets manipulated at that point there’s little that can be done, and to be frank the jb could manipulate him too.

Tell that to the ADULT women that were 'manipulated' into sex. Tell that to the people prosecuting Andrew Tate for 'human trafficking' ADULT women.
Again your misandry is easy to spot. Adult men are supposed to be these moral, experienced, strong, privileged human beings that, if they do experience misfortune, it's their own fault. Their own doing. They are adult men, they should magically be able to 'properly navigate' through life.

Do you propose to lower the age of consent, abolish it or what? What do you actually want?

Yeah. 12yo should be a good start.

Nope, cuz no every guy that goes for jbs fits that description, you have chads here like Amnesia (who actually experienced teen love btw) with triple digit laycount rambling about jbs.

Every case is personal and specific. Which is why it's idiotic to make laws like this in the first place that generalize everything to an absurd degree. Besides, people should largely be free to pursue that what makes them happy.

I've never had teen-love and I've never had sex with a girl with a lower body-count than me before in my life. I've never had sex with a virgin and I barely have any relationship experience at all.

I see that most successful relationships around me are experienced men dating virgin women. Because the weakest link in most relationships is the (non-virgin) woman giving up on it and wanting to fuck other men.
Same happened with my own 'relationships'. Non-virgin women with sky-high demands and no tolerance for errors.

 

[MoggerGaston]

No, but that’s such an unlikely scenario, most women won’t feel attracted at all to significantly older men unless they have daddy issues, jbs I’ve talked with told me this, and even if they did not all of them would be ok with such a direct aspie approach.

That's fine. So let the girls decide instead of having the law/society vilify a man expressing his romantic interest. You agree with us.

 

[Aladin]

No, but that’s such an unlikely scenario, most women won’t feel attracted at all to significantly older men unless they have daddy issues, jbs I’ve talked with told me this, and even if they did not all of them would be ok with such a direct aspie approach.

Whites have more advanced frontal lobes. Based on this, where do you think the morally acceptable line is for an unlimited age gap for white and black teenage girls and older men?

 

[Aladin]

Power dynamics are normal in life. Women actively seek out men that are more powerful than them. More experienced, richer, dominant, confident, older, and so on.

Villainizing power dynamics imbalances is villainizing normal human sexuality. And then again, only punishing men for normal human sexuality. Because as always, women are victims in society's view.


Yeah so they should be charged with rape then, but given more lenient punishment than adult men. We agree on this.


Tell that to the ADULT women that were 'manipulated' into sex. Tell that to the people prosecuting Andrew Tate for 'human trafficking' ADULT women.
Again your misandry is easy to spot. Adult men are supposed to be these moral, experienced, strong, privileged human beings that, if they do experience misfortune, it's their own fault. Their own doing. They are adult men, they should magically be able to 'properly navigate' through life.


Yeah. 12yo should be a good start.


Every case is personal and specific. Which is why it's idiotic to make laws like this in the first place that generalize everything to an absurd degree. Besides, people should largely be free to pursue that what makes them happy.

I've never had teen-love and I've never had sex with a girl with a lower body-count than me before in my life. I've never had sex with a virgin and I barely have any relationship experience at all.

I see that most successful relationships around me are experienced men dating virgin women. Because the weakest link in most relationships is the (non-virgin) woman giving up on it and wanting to fuck other men.
Same happened with my own 'relationships'. Non-virgin women with sky-high demands and no tolerance for errors.

That's fine. So let the girls decide instead of having the law/society vilify a man expressing his romantic interest. You agree with us.

@Pendejo hasn’t responded. Guess that means he conceded the argument. He may cope around it by claiming he got bored or some shit but deep down he knows he’s wrong and is just spouting mainstream feminist talking points. Always gonna have people like that on sites like these, in order to make it seem like this site is supposedly not a pedo site and we need to not look bad. In reality the elites just wanna demonize normal male attraction.

 

[MoggerGaston]

@Pendejo hasn’t responded. Guess that means he conceded the argument. He may cope around it by claiming he got bored or some shit but deep down he knows he’s wrong and is just spouting mainstream feminist talking points. Always gonna have people like that on sites like these, in order to make it seem like this site is supposedly not a pedo site and we need to not look bad. In reality the elites just wanna demonize normal male attraction.

Unfortunately it's not logic, morality and ethics that win in these arguments.

It's popularity. The person with the most 'popular' opinion/idea, is right. Even if it's wrong.