Why is Ratings sub so… different?

O

one job away

Luminary
Joined
Jan 31, 2021
Posts
9,672
Reputation
11,850
Why is Ratings sub so… different?

Compared to this sub, I mean. I thought it was just an extension of Offtopics, but at this point it’s pretty much similar to any beauty sub, but with ratings, which by the way are very generous.

What I’ve noticed about the sub:

- Strongly against plastic surgery (which I personally agree should be last resort, but sometimes it’s the only option to become conventionally attractive).

- Body positive (which I am all for, I hate body shaming, don’t get me wrong) but to the degree that the advice isn’t about conventional attractiveness anymore. You know, some women might have a bmi of 24, which is technically healthy, but would still benefit from dropping to 21-22 and that is backed up by science. If they are asking wether weight loss could help them become more attractive in the conventional sense, then the answer is usually a yes, not “oh no girl, your body is goals!”.

- Talking about how a feature that is widely considered a failo makes you look more “unique” and not boring, like all those Instagram models (that currently are considered to be the standard of beauty). I mean, there are plenty of supermodels with those failos, but they are usually more subtle and the rest of the face is just flawless.

- Talking about how subjective beauty is. I thought it was a sub about conventional attractiveness? That’s pretty objective, with the only difference being where you live.

- Not taking female gaze into account. I agree that we shouldn’t do anything to please women, but if you want to become conventionally attractive in order to reap the social and professional benefits, then keep in mind that women are around half of the population and most positions in the household are held by them.

I don’t know if this is an overcorrection, due to the sheer amount of femcels who try to put down men in all those other rating subs.

Another theory of mine, is based on the fact that even the most mainstream beauty subs right now are becoming pretty knowledgeable, men seem to put **a lot** of effort and money into their appearance, maybe the most we have during the past couple of decades. I guess a number of those people fell into the rabbit hole, searching for a female dominated rating sub and found Ratings?

What are your thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Why is Ratings sub so… different?

Compared to this sub, I mean. I thought it was just an extension of Offtopics, but at this point it’s pretty much similar to any beauty sub, but with ratings, which by the way are very generous.

What I’ve noticed about the sub:

- Strongly against plastic surgery (which I personally agree should be last resort, but sometimes it’s the only option to become conventionally attractive).

- Body positive (which I am all for, I hate body shaming, don’t get me wrong) but to the degree that the advice isn’t about conventional attractiveness anymore. You know, some women might have a bmi of 24, which is technically healthy, but would still benefit from dropping to 21-22 and that is backed up by science. If they are asking wether weight loss could help them become more attractive in the conventional sense, then the answer is usually a yes, not “oh no girl, your body is goals!”.

- Talking about how a feature that is widely considered a failo makes you look more “unique” and not boring, like all those Instagram models (that currently are considered to be the standard of beauty). I mean, there are plenty of supermodels with those failos, but they are usually more subtle and the rest of the face is just flawless.

- Talking about how subjective beauty is. I thought it was a sub about conventional attractiveness? That’s pretty objective, with the only difference being where you live.

- Not taking female gaze into account. I agree that we shouldn’t do anything to please women, but if you want to become conventionally attractive in order to reap the social and professional benefits, then keep in mind that women are around half of the population and most positions in the household are held by them.

I don’t know if this is an overcorrection, due to the sheer amount of femcels who try to put down men in all those other rating subs.

Another theory of mine, is based on the fact that even the most mainstream beauty subs right now are becoming pretty knowledgeable, men seem to put **a lot** of effort and money into their appearance, maybe the most we have during the past couple of decades. I guess a number of those people fell into the rabbit hole, searching for a female dominated rating sub and found Ratings?

What are your thoughts?
are u looking at the same forum as me?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Broski and StrangerDanger
this has to be a pasta
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksOrDeath
Strongly against plastic surgery
I wouldn’t say so, the prob is that most people posting have issues mainly with symmetry and harmony which aren’t correctable by surgery.

Body positive
Not true ppl are pretty honest when leaning down will help and most raters recommend lifting heavy.
Talking about how a feature that is widely considered a failo makes you look more “unique” and not boring, like all those Instagram models (that currently are considered to be the standard of beauty). I mean, there are plenty of supermodels with those failos, but they are usually more subtle and the rest of the face is just flawless.
agreed
Talking about how subjective beauty is. I thought it was a sub about conventional attractiveness? That’s pretty objective, with the only difference being where you live.
beauty is a chaotic measure which means while we can approximate it we can never objectively measure it. Rates for beauty will naturally follow a normal curve. For example if your mean rating is. A 5/10, 80 % of the rates you get should be between a 4.5/5.5 and 95% should be between a 4-6 and 99% should be 3.5-6.5. This is why it’s imperative you average the rates you get.



Not taking female gaze into account
I think most ppl take this into account as women do prefer masc faces and esp harmony which is considered immportant by most eaters.
 

Similar threads

aabb123
Replies
1
Views
46
ezio6
ezio6
V
Replies
0
Views
53
Vitamin_C
V
kindinternetman
Replies
2
Views
92
ltn_looksminner
ltn_looksminner
whitebitchslayer
Replies
21
Views
222
Mess
Mess
veilzipork
Replies
21
Views
241
sluttysuzy420
sluttysuzy420

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top