Why is the ethnic skull so subhuman?

[Deleted member 155219]

Everyone knows that the ethnic skull is always deformed in some shape or form but why? Why is it this way?

@pfl @druiglooksmaxer @Chadeep @Klasik616 @FaceandBBC what is the science behind this?

 

[Deleted member 163319]

 

[anthony111553]

its dogshit

 

[Deleted member 155219]

its dogshit

Yes but why?

 

[Klasik616]

Everyone knows that the ethnic skull is always deformed in some shape or form but why? Why is it this way?

View attachment 4114675
View attachment 4114676

View attachment 4114677
View attachment 4114678
View attachment 4114679
@pfl @druiglooksmaxer @Chadeep @Klasik616 @FaceandBBC what is the science behind this?

I been telling only whites have good skull shapes, white users don't notice the small differences between the latino, black or arab skull. Look at Hemsworth, you think a latino or arab can have that skull shape ever? Nope, skull = race. It's so obvious bro, many greycel whites are being rated HTN on the rating section because they have good bones and ratios. When was the last time you saw a latino getting rated HTN on this forum.

 

[Deleted member 155219]

I been telling only whites have good skull shapes, white users don't notice the small differences between the latino, black or arab skull. Look at Hemsworth, you think a latino or arab can have that skull shape ever? Nope, skull = race.

It’s also what separates us Arabs and Latinos from meds.

 

[Klasik616]

Facial ratios depend on race.
latinos are mixed with natives that's why they have wide skulls.
If they mix more with blacks or spaniards their skulls will be long.

 

[IAMNOTANINCEL]

 

[Vermilioncore]

 

[Klasik616]

Blacks and asians have protruding mouths, blacks can be recessed because their mouths are too big making the lower third longer while asians have wide jaws and square skulls.

 

[Deleted member 155219]

View attachment 4114705View attachment 4114712

Cherry-picked example ethnic boi.

 

[Deleted member 117142]

View attachment 4114705View attachment 4114712

That ethiopid has a dogshit Appeal and his skull is a shit too, now post a Nordic

 

[Jager]

Everyone knows that the ethnic skull is always deformed in some shape or form but why? Why is it this way?

View attachment 4114675
View attachment 4114676

View attachment 4114677
View attachment 4114678
View attachment 4114679
@pfl @druiglooksmaxer @Chadeep @Klasik616 @FaceandBBC what is the science behind this?

i dont think ive ever seen a longer face than the girl in the first pic

 

[IAMNOTANINCEL]

Cherry-picked example ethnic boi.

Like your entire post nigga? Just post deformed ethnics vs whites with supreme genetics

 

[habeebullah]

You can't just group all ethnics in the same group jfl. Middle easterns and to an extent some south Asians have caucasoid skulls

 

[IAMNOTANINCEL]

That ethiopid has a dogshit Appeal and his skull is a shit too, now post a Nordic
View attachment 4114730

He has a better skull than this guy tho? its just the coloring

 

[Jager]

Blacks and asians have protruding mouths, blacks can be recessed because their mouths are too big making the lower third longer while asians have wide jaws and square skulls.

blacks and asians gotta have the worst skull

 

[Deleted member 117142]

He has a better skull than this guy tho? its just the coloring

Negative IQ or ragebait

 

[Jager]

You can't just group all ethnics in the same group jfl. Middle easterns and to an extent some south Asians have caucasoid skulls

most curries and arabs have bad skulls but yeah a small percentage has good skull same cannot be said for 99% of asians and blacks

 

[Deleted member 117142]

He has a better skull than this guy tho? its just the coloring

How he skull is better If he have that Freeza third form skull shape from the side?

 

[Deleted member 155219]

Like your entire post nigga? Just post deformed ethnics vs whites with supreme genetics

Idris Elba is considered to be an “attractive” in the west. And the second picture is of two guys in the same show.

You found a rat face and put him next to a hunter-gatherer.

Also it’s commonly known the ethnic skull is dogshit

 

[Deleted member 155219]

You can't just group all ethnics in the same group jfl. Middle easterns and to an extent some south Asians have caucasoid skulls

Retard. Every ethnic group can carry a caucasoid skull. It’s not there native skull is the point.

Most ethnics are without the caucasoid skull and have subhuman their own respective skulls

 

[Deleted member 207880]

 

[TheStonerOne]

It’s also what separates us Arabs and Latinos from meds.

You do realise that Western Eurasians (most Mediterraneans are Western Eurasian) overlap in terms of craniofacial features, right?

"Latino" and "Arab" are vague. A large proportion of "Latinos" are overwhelmingly Western Eurasian so would largely resemble other Western Eurasians. The vast majority of "Arabs" are either Western Eurasian or North African and Western Eurasians have similar cranofacial features to North Africans.

 

[Jager]

Retard. Every ethnic group can carry a caucasoid skull. It’s not there native skull is the point.

Most ethnics are without the caucasoid skull and have subhuman their own respective skulls

how does the average black and gook cope with life

 

[habeebullah]

most curries and arabs have bad skulls but yeah a small percentage has good skull same cannot be said for 99% of asians and blacks

Yeah I agree that most curries have bad skulls with the exception of some North Indians and Pakistanis, but from experience I've noticed that middle easterners outside the gulf tend to have good skulls (Levantines, Turks, Persians)

 

[Jager]

View attachment 4114745View attachment 4114747View attachment 4114748View attachment 4114754View attachment 4114756View attachment 4114759

MEDPILL

 

[Deleted member 117142]

Retard. Every ethnic group can carry a caucasoid skull. It’s not there native skull is the point.

Most ethnics are without the caucasoid skull and have subhuman their own respective skulls

Nigger skull basic

 

[Jager]

Yeah I agree that most curries have bad skulls with the exception of some North Indians and Pakistanis, but from experience I've noticed that middle easterners outside the gulf tend to have good skulls (Levantines, Turks, Persians)

non gulf arabs have higher percentages of people with good skulls colouring and overall whiteness and attractiveness so no suprise

 

[Deleted member 155219]

Yeah I agree that most curries have bad skulls with the exception of some North Indians and Pakistanis, but from experience I've noticed that middle easterners outside the gulf tend to have good skulls (Levantines, Turks, Persians)

There is no “good skulls” there is the white skull, you have it or you don’t

 

[Deleted member 155219]

non gulf arabs have higher percentages of people with good skulls colouring and overall whiteness and attractiveness so no suprise

White rape

 

[Jager]

White rape

unironically the case

 

[Debetro]

I been telling only whites have good skull shapes, white users don't notice the small differences between the latino, black or arab skull. Look at Hemsworth, you think a latino or arab can have that skull shape ever? Nope, skull = race. It's so obvious bro, many greycel whites are being rated HTN on the rating section because they have good bones and ratios. When was the last time you saw a latino getting rated HTN on this forum.

I've been saying the same. Whites seem to be the only ones with actual human skulls without simiesque appearance, there are some exceptions of course. And not all whites have the skull I'm talking about, tons of "whites" with garbage skull too.

 

[Deleted member 207880]

Retard. Every ethnic group can carry a caucasoid skull. It’s not there native skull is the point.

Most ethnics are without the caucasoid skull and have subhuman their own respective skulls

Jfl at muh cacasoid mongaloid that theory has been debunked for centuries

 

[hollowlight]

Everyone knows that the ethnic skull is always deformed in some shape or form but why? Why is it this way?

View attachment 4114675
View attachment 4114676

View attachment 4114677
View attachment 4114678
View attachment 4114679
@pfl @druiglooksmaxer @Chadeep @Klasik616 @FaceandBBC what is the science behind this?

being white is literally a blessing

 

[Deleted member 155219]

Jfl at muh cacasoid mongaloid that theory has been debunked for centuries

No, they just claim that the classifications are “obsolete” and not always accurate so they can say that race has no biological difference

 

[Deleted member 207880]

No, they just claim that the classifications are “obsolete” and not always accurate so they can say that race has no biological difference

No, they just claim that the classifications are “obsolete” and not always accurate so they can say that race has no biological difference

It was literally made up to promote scientific racism Jfl at incels still clinging to this debunked myth

The concept of "5 major races" as distinct, inherent biological categories is a myth rooted in outdated scientific theories and social constructs, not in biological reality. The most prominent example is Johann Friedrich Blumenbach's 1775 classification into Caucasian, Mongolian, Malayan, Ethiopian, and American races, which was based on superficial physical traits and geographic locations rather than genetics and is now largely rejected by modern anthropology and biology. While mythological stories, such as the Five Ages of Man in Greek mythology (Gold, Silver, Bronze, Heroic, Iron), exist, they describe divine ages, not literal biological races.

There are no “major races” human genetic variation exists on a spectrum. People cling to the “major races” theory because it appeals to our sense of tribalism most likely. It has nothing to do with actual genetic variation.

 

[Deleted member 155219]

It was literally made up to promote scientific racism Jfl at incels still clinging to this debunked myth

The concept of "5 major races" as distinct, inherent biological categories is a myth rooted in outdated scientific theories and social constructs, not in biological reality. The most prominent example is Johann Friedrich Blumenbach's 1775 classification into Caucasian, Mongolian, Malayan, Ethiopian, and American races, which was based on superficial physical traits and geographic locations rather than genetics and is now largely rejected by modern anthropology and biology. While mythological stories, such as the Five Ages of Man in Greek mythology (Gold, Silver, Bronze, Heroic, Iron), exist, they describe divine ages, not literal biological races.

There are no “major races” human genetic variation exists on a spectrum. People cling to the “major races” theory because it appeals to our sense of tribalism most likely. It has nothing to do with actual genetic variation.

Same species

 

[Debetro]

Jfl at muh cacasoid mongaloid that theory has been debunked for centuries

Actual theory

 

[Chadeep]

 

[Deleted member 155219]

View attachment 4114858

Brutal for ethnic alien megamind mogged by white chad

 

[Deleted member 207880]

Actual theory

View attachment 4114854

Source: schizo 4 chan user

 

[Debetro]

Source: schizo 4 chan user

Disprove anything

 

[Deleted member 163319]

It was literally made up to promote scientific racism Jfl at incels still clinging to this debunked myth

The concept of "5 major races" as distinct, inherent biological categories is a myth rooted in outdated scientific theories and social constructs, not in biological reality. The most prominent example is Johann Friedrich Blumenbach's 1775 classification into Caucasian, Mongolian, Malayan, Ethiopian, and American races, which was based on superficial physical traits and geographic locations rather than genetics and is now largely rejected by modern anthropology and biology. While mythological stories, such as the Five Ages of Man in Greek mythology (Gold, Silver, Bronze, Heroic, Iron), exist, they describe divine ages, not literal biological races.

There are no “major races” human genetic variation exists on a spectrum. People cling to the “major races” theory because it appeals to our sense of tribalism most likely. It has nothing to do with actual genetic variation.

@Tigermoggerlol Opinions?

 

[Tigermoggerlol]

Everyone knows that the ethnic skull is always deformed in some shape or form but why? Why is it this way?

View attachment 4114675
View attachment 4114676

View attachment 4114677
View attachment 4114678
View attachment 4114679
@pfl @druiglooksmaxer @Chadeep @Klasik616 @FaceandBBC what is the science behind this?

Bc they come from natives and natives are almost half animal and animals have weird skulls that's why over for ethnics

 

[Deleted member 207880]

Same species
View attachment 4114833
View attachment 4114834
View attachment 4114835
View attachment 4114836
View attachment 4114837
View attachment 4114838
View attachment 4114839
View attachment 4114840
View attachment 4114842
View attachment 4114843
View attachment 4114844
View attachment 4114845
View attachment 4114846
View attachment 4114848
View attachment 4114849
View attachment 4114850
View attachment 4114851

View attachment 4114856

We wuz aryan and sheit

 

[Deleted member 155219]

We wuz aryan and sheit

View attachment 4114897

YOU are brown

 

[Deleted member 207880]

Arabs are brown

 

[TheStonerOne]

Actual theory

View attachment 4114854

Disprove anything

The concept of race has long been disproved. Do you really need 100 sources (that you'll ignore) to suggest races are nonsense? There just isn't enough genetic variation between humans to even consider "types" of humans "breeds". We're LESS genetically diverse than dog breeds let alone chimp subspecies. The "relative" regional and continental differences between humans is 0.5% at best. Humans have ancestries, but not "races". The small genetic differences between humans is clinal anyway so a "European" region that borders "West Asia" is going to have a mixture of both genetic ancestries.

Also, what do haplogroups have to do with your physical appearance? Haplogroups are just small parts of your DNA and they're not responsible for skin colour.

 

[Deleted member 155219]

The concept of race has long been disproved. Do you really need 100 sources (that you'll ignore) to suggest races are nonsense? There just isn't enough genetic variation between humans to even consider "types" of humans "breeds". We're LESS genetically diverse than dog breeds let alone chimp subspecies. The "relative" regional and continental differences between humans is 0.5% at best. Humans have ancestries, but not "races". The small genetic differences between humans is clinal anyway so a "European" region that borders "West Asia" is going to have a mixture of both genetic ancestries.

Also, what do haplogroups have to do with your physical appearance? Haplogroups are just small parts of your DNA and they're not responsible for skin colour.

So why do nigger run fast, smoke backwoods, and commit crime