Why is Timothee Chalamet considered gl despite having so many psl flaws.

lerwaf123

lerwaf123

Gold
Joined
Mar 23, 2024
Posts
979
Reputation
852
1728146106738
Close set eyes,nct, rounded eye area, short lower third, narrow chin, long philtrum, narrow lower third, autisticlly short face, no browridge, slight hook on nose, slight recession, asymmetry, uee, short ramus. Why isn't he a subhuman? He only has somewhat good colouring, good facial angularity and hair halo. Just be lean and have hair theory.
1728146259089
1728146402060
 
  • +1
Reactions: illusivespirits
good jaw decent eye area
 
good jaw decent eye area
His eye area is mediocre. Only eye colour saves him. His lower third has angularity but almost every fucking flaw that I listed. Just be angular and have good colouring?
 
Kendall

eye area can't look bad with dark eyebrows/light green eyes. It's striking and that's what matters
 
Because PSL is beyond retarded

It simply doesn't have enough substance behind it, beyond the actual classification of traits
 
View attachment 3219801
eye area can't look bad with dark eyebrows/light green eyes. It's striking and that's what matters
Guy in this picture has good eye shape and good eye colour. Timothee chalamet only has good eye colour. He has nct, droopy lower eyelids, close set eyes, uee, distance between his eyes is less than one eye apart, medium set eyebrows, no medial canthus. In bad lightning where you can't see his eye colour he looks like a drug addict
1728147941008
 
I bet, that you’d say he’s a good looking guy before discovering this site.
PSL doesn’t necessarily translate into real life appeal
 
  • +1
Reactions: Acion and incelbhai
I bet, that you’d say he’s a good looking guy before discovering this site.
PSL doesn’t necessarily translate into real life appeal
If psl is cope then how to measure attractivness?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Acion
The bicycle seat jawline + puppy eyes makes his face memorable, unique
 
If psl is cope then how to measure attractivness?
It’s not cope but most people in this forum do not necessarily have the education to accurately judge it.
They see a excessively large jaw and Hunter eyes and that’s enough.
In real life it’s obviously much more nuanced.
Basically men tend to prefer overly exaggerated dimorphic features (in themselves), while women typically look at the bigger picture and prefer features, that fall within a certain average - above average range.
Facial beauty is measurable but when it comes to attraction, there are more adding factors at play, which is what most here would deny or view as „cope“.
Timothee is objectively above average in terms of attractiveness and besides he has tons of other stuff going for him.
 
His face shape is unique that makes him stand out in a good way.

And he has been represented as some fantasy character with major harmony/appeal and having a good pheno that is universally attractive to women.


I even want to include "birth control" which a lot of young women are on and that makes them attracted to more feminine men and this goes not just for him but various other people.
 
I was watching strawberry park reacting to this nectar video where in one clip a girl rejects everyone who stood up to shoot their shot because she wants someone who is a timothee Chalamet "lookalike":feelskek:

 
  • JFL
Reactions: lerwaf123
If you have high status you have higher smv that chads
 
If you have high status you have higher smv that chads
Michael cera also has high status but no one treats him like timothee chalamet and he doesn't have reputation of sex symbol unlike timothee
 
Michael cera also has high status but no one treats him like timothee chalamet and he doesn't have reputation of sex symbol unlike timothee
It's not even close he sorta had a big movie nearly 20 years ago, and he also looks like complete shit.
 
Timothee Chalamet has been in way more promient movies and looks a million times better than Cera. Also Cera always was cast in low status dork rolls Chalamet was cased as a king, willy wonka, dune and is seen as serious actor not a joke actor
 
View attachment 3219752Close set eyes,nct, rounded eye area, short lower third, narrow chin, long philtrum, narrow lower third, autisticlly short face, no browridge, slight hook on nose, slight recession, asymmetry, uee, short ramus. Why isn't he a subhuman? He only has somewhat good colouring, good facial angularity and hair halo. Just be lean and have hair theory. View attachment 3219753View attachment 3219765
Just be lean and have outward gonion.

Also he has a pretty good midface, his cheekbones are prominent, his nose shape is also good, he has good hair and a female gaze haircut and also good colouring
 
View attachment 3219752Close set eyes,nct, rounded eye area, short lower third, narrow chin, long philtrum, narrow lower third, autisticlly short face, no browridge, slight hook on nose, slight recession, asymmetry, uee, short ramus. Why isn't he a subhuman? He only has somewhat good colouring, good facial angularity and hair halo. Just be lean and have hair theory. View attachment 3219753View attachment 3219765
I also think his jaw is not as bad as people say, he has a good frontal angle, also recession and anything related to the side profile is mostly cope anyway
 
Also Cera always was cast in low status dork rolls Chalamet was cased as a king, willy wonka, dune and is seen as serious actor not a joke actor
Because Timothee is attractive and sera is not
 
Just be lean and have outward gonion.

Also he has a pretty good midface, his cheekbones are prominent, his nose shape is also good, he has good hair and a female gaze haircut and also good colouring
His fwhr is also decently compact
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top