NT Master
Prophet of the Racepill
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2022
- Posts
- 188
- Reputation
- 327
I was thinking about sex symbols the other day. Every male sex symbol (both real & fictional) is either a muscle-bound hunk or a smooth pretty boy. Every female sex symbol I can think of is either a curvaceous bimbo or a lithe beauty. In neither case does the intelligence of the sex symbol seem to matter. This is despite the fact that intelligence is very valuable (especially in modern times) and inheritable.
Intellectuals in modern western societies are seen as unattractive nerds who don't get the opposite sex. The only time when intellectuals become desirable is if they use their intellect to get rich; but that is really the desire for money. And there isn't a perfect connection between wealth and intelligence.
Ask yourself, if you found out a woman you knew was a genius or an acclaimed professor, would you become more attracted to her? If sexual attraction is ultimately related to fitness of offspring, it seems odd that one of the most important factors in an offspring's fitness is not selected for? Although to be fair, you generally cannot tell a person's intelligence or mental health just by looking at them.
Intellectuals in modern western societies are seen as unattractive nerds who don't get the opposite sex. The only time when intellectuals become desirable is if they use their intellect to get rich; but that is really the desire for money. And there isn't a perfect connection between wealth and intelligence.
Ask yourself, if you found out a woman you knew was a genius or an acclaimed professor, would you become more attracted to her? If sexual attraction is ultimately related to fitness of offspring, it seems odd that one of the most important factors in an offspring's fitness is not selected for? Although to be fair, you generally cannot tell a person's intelligence or mental health just by looking at them.