B
Bullo_S1
Iron
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2026
- Posts
- 4
- Reputation
- 0
We all know the late bloomer bullshit, they grow taller and stuff, But is it really that important compared to facial aesthetics? mid early with high hgh production and low estrogenic profile is way better than any case of late puberty, not only in terms of height, but facially the only thing that seperates an appealing face from men and women is the timing and timespan of their puberty, A late one makes faces more prone to environmental instability (facial assymetries, unappealing ratios)
Those are major flaws, And yes environment instability can cause both of them, a mid early puberty keeps our face in the most ideal state we can have, A MIX between manly and childish look, extremely early puberty can make you look underdeveloped, also it can close growth plates before even fgfr-3 starts to slow down proliferation, Not ideal at all, so the conclusion is early puberty and trying to delay your puberty as much as you can is more detrimental than letting it start at the prime which is late 13 years old/early 14 years old, And yes you should get steroids (temporarily) at that age to kick start puberty since it's better than a late one, And aromatase inhibitors (which are now being hated but don't go with the traction of the internet just because they say so) yes they do work, but using something like letrozole literally ERASES your estrogen, we need to avoid such a thing, our bones are also using estrogen as a growth signal not a fusion signal only, so the only AI you should use is Exemestane (52% to 72% suppression instead of letrozole which has 97% to 99%) these things are relatively cheap, and exemastane ideal dose is 2.5 mg every 2 days, If you're "lucky" enough to be in this age group and see this thread you're probably more mature than the rest of your peers to be this deep in, and getting the pharmaceuticals proves it again so you're probably good to research the doses and be safe on your own, plus I'm not recommending this it doesn't have a full on study, but I made this conclusion by seeing growth patterns around me, so if you actually are desperate, try this after researching.
Those are major flaws, And yes environment instability can cause both of them, a mid early puberty keeps our face in the most ideal state we can have, A MIX between manly and childish look, extremely early puberty can make you look underdeveloped, also it can close growth plates before even fgfr-3 starts to slow down proliferation, Not ideal at all, so the conclusion is early puberty and trying to delay your puberty as much as you can is more detrimental than letting it start at the prime which is late 13 years old/early 14 years old, And yes you should get steroids (temporarily) at that age to kick start puberty since it's better than a late one, And aromatase inhibitors (which are now being hated but don't go with the traction of the internet just because they say so) yes they do work, but using something like letrozole literally ERASES your estrogen, we need to avoid such a thing, our bones are also using estrogen as a growth signal not a fusion signal only, so the only AI you should use is Exemestane (52% to 72% suppression instead of letrozole which has 97% to 99%) these things are relatively cheap, and exemastane ideal dose is 2.5 mg every 2 days, If you're "lucky" enough to be in this age group and see this thread you're probably more mature than the rest of your peers to be this deep in, and getting the pharmaceuticals proves it again so you're probably good to research the doses and be safe on your own, plus I'm not recommending this it doesn't have a full on study, but I made this conclusion by seeing growth patterns around me, so if you actually are desperate, try this after researching.
