Klasik616
๐ฝ๐ก๐๐๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ก๐ก๐๐ ๐ฉ๐ค ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐๐ค๐ง๐
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2024
- Posts
- 14,074
- Reputation
- 26,169
It doesn't make sense in biological terms.
Most individuals from the same animal species look 90% alike, only 10% have physical differences.
But in humans you'll see faces with bones, faces without bones and muscles, dark and light skintones and extreme height differences, even in men we see dick differences. In terms of dimorphism humans seem not to be very different cus other species have noticeable dimorphism.
Humans had to use copes like long hair, dresses, makeup and other stuff for women.
I simply don't understand, we cannot be from the same race.
In biology there's a category called family that groups different species, races should be classified as species but they (scientists) deny this because we all are humans. What's are your thoughts on this?
Even if we deny the idea of beauty because it's historical, we can definitely see differences between humans faces how do we explain these differences when "we all come from Africa"?
Most individuals from the same animal species look 90% alike, only 10% have physical differences.
But in humans you'll see faces with bones, faces without bones and muscles, dark and light skintones and extreme height differences, even in men we see dick differences. In terms of dimorphism humans seem not to be very different cus other species have noticeable dimorphism.
Humans had to use copes like long hair, dresses, makeup and other stuff for women.
I simply don't understand, we cannot be from the same race.
In biology there's a category called family that groups different species, races should be classified as species but they (scientists) deny this because we all are humans. What's are your thoughts on this?
Even if we deny the idea of beauty because it's historical, we can definitely see differences between humans faces how do we explain these differences when "we all come from Africa"?
Last edited: