• Forums
  • Looksmax
  • Offtopic
  • ๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜‚๐—ด๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜โ“

๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜‚๐—ด๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜โ“

Klasik616

Klasik616

๐˜ฝ๐™ก๐™–๐™˜๐™ ๐™ฅ๐™ž๐™ก๐™ก๐™š๐™™ ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ง๐™š
Joined
Feb 13, 2024
Posts
14,074
Reputation
26,169
It doesn't make sense in biological terms.
Most individuals from the same animal species look 90% alike, only 10% have physical differences.

But in humans you'll see faces with bones, faces without bones and muscles, dark and light skintones and extreme height differences, even in men we see dick differences. In terms of dimorphism humans seem not to be very different cus other species have noticeable dimorphism.

Humans had to use copes like long hair, dresses, makeup and other stuff for women.
I simply don't understand, we cannot be from the same race.

In biology there's a category called family that groups different species, races should be classified as species but they (scientists) deny this because we all are humans. What's are your thoughts on this?

Even if we deny the idea of beauty because it's historical, we can definitely see differences between humans faces how do we explain these differences when "we all come from Africa"?

 
Last edited:
1734127844149
1734127874415
 
Makes perfect sense actually, we spread out all across the world and were exposed to drastically different environments which created physical differences

Then those minor differences between eachother would also grow within those groups and so on and so fourth
 
  • +1
Reactions: RealNinja, ShowerMaxxing, Debetro and 3 others
Last edited:
Makes perfect sense actually, we spread out all across the world and were exposed to drastically different environments which created physical differences

Then those minor differences between eachother would also grow within those groups and so on and so fourth
Oh sure by your "scientific logic" niggers would change their race if they moved to Asia or America because it's a different weather.
 
Ik itโ€™s brootal, isnt it?
 
Oh sure by your "scientific logic" niggers would change their race if they moved to Asia or America.
At this point in time no obviously

If they moved off the continent at the dawn of humanity they would have, and guess what they did. Thatโ€™s in fact why theyโ€™re Asian today
 
Makes perfect sense actually, we spread out all across the world and were exposed to drastically different environments which created physical differences

Then those minor differences between eachother would also grow within those groups and so on and so fourth
But why those features looks good in our mind?? They are all meant for survaiving. Is this just media manipulation?
 
Last edited:
At this point in time no obviously

If they moved off the continent at the dawn of humanity they would have, and guess what they did. Thatโ€™s in fact why theyโ€™re Asian today
Yea humans moved from Africa to Europe because they could (but they couldn't move from Asia to America cus the Bering stretch theory has been debunked) then the ones who stayed in Europe got "white appeareance" and the ones who stayed in Asia got "asian appeareance" (considering they're from same species), BUT this had to be after the extinction of other RACES of humans because we are all "homo sapiens" and surprisingly asians are shorter than europeans and have brachy skulls.
 
But why those features looks good in our mind?? They are all meant for survaiving.
Well aesthetics are engrained in our biology to a degree. Why that is isnโ€™t really explainable other then human desire and philosophical discussion

Some just happened to turn out pleasant looking some didnโ€™t
 
  • +1
Reactions: Klasik616
Oh sure by your "scientific logic" niggers would change their race if they moved to Asia or America because it's a different weather.
Evolution did never exist in your opinion?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: MrShimano
Evolution did never exist in your opinion?
I'm not convinced about the part where humans would lose melanin and change facial features according to a weather. Humans have monkey DNA but the phenotype differences and most importantly, mind differences (like the ability of languages and thinking) cannot be explained by science rn. Specially because americans (real americans not europeans) couldn't come from Africa. There's not a scientific conclussion about the origin of "native americans". You're saying that the dawn of Rift created a whole new species called "humans", that's Engel's and Darwin's theory (that monkeys changed cus they had to learn how to survive with the hands). I call that bs.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro
Well aesthetics are engrained in our biology to a degree. Why that is isnโ€™t really explainable other then human desire and philosophical discussion

Some just happened to turn out pleasant looking some didnโ€™t
I agree on this at a certain point.
But nowadays aesthetics is based mainly on european standards of beauty despite the vast majority of the world being ethnic. Some things like facial harmony and ratios can be considered objective but facial features are dependent on race. Things like symmetry might be considered a "pretty" trait but a symmetrical person is not always "pretty" you get what I mean.
 
Humans always cared about looks
Better jaw = better airway = can fight off tigers
 
Not that different.
Different eyes, hair color but they definitely are from the same species.
How do we explain the gap between abos and french people for example.
How do we explain native americans, they didn't come from Asia.

Only egyptian cats look like different species.
sphinx cat GIF

Srly what happened here?
Egyptian heat obviously, same as elephants vs mammoths
 
  • +1
Reactions: Klasik616
Egyptian heat obviously, same as elephants vs mammoths
1734129744576
this is a good example in plants but these plants did not come from other plants in a different weather.

If genetical recombination only changes beauty, weather could not change our race but races exist so weather change the way we look.

But how exactly does that happen? Then genes must also change according to the weather otherwise we all would have the same genes.

So if we all moved to a certain place that means we would change the way we look even if we don't have kids with people who look very different?

What I'm saying is: to create new phenotypes there has to be certain genes that don't come from the same community (race mixing). But apparently races don't exist. For example when hispanics colonized America they created mestizos.

Polar bears are a different species from other beards because of the weather, why not the same for humans? We should call black and whites different species from the family of homos.
 
Last edited:
true, but most animals all have a similar and decent appearance
1734131025160
1734131038204

Almost no differences except pigmentation.
1734131070243
1734131090281

Example of sexual dimorphism.
These are not differences between males or females but between genders.
 
  • +1
Reactions: realshit

Similar threads

yandex99
Replies
25
Views
2K
chadison
chadison
_MVP_
Replies
10
Views
170
Youใ…ค
Youใ…ค
Bars
Replies
16
Views
259
Baban
Baban
Edgarpill
Replies
22
Views
1K
Youใ…ค
Youใ…ค

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Forums
  • Looksmax
  • Offtopic
  • ๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜‚๐—ด๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜โ“
Back
Top