D
Deleted member 2846
Kraken
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2019
- Posts
- 15,028
- Reputation
- 26,968
All that matters is your IRL and SMV score. PSL should only be used to analyze faces based on male’s tendencies and attractive faces... come to think of it, that’s what PSL does.
PSL is a very lose term, no one actually means that PSL rates mean. Everyone has their own slight variation on how they rate. It’s subjectively objective. We hone in on 1 agreed aspect which is face, but not everyone rates just face. We rate other things like height, race, skin color, etc along with face because we may just subconsciously coping even before the rate we think of comes into our heads. Attraction is based on a fraction of a second for everyone, but when you stop and think about it, you come to other conclusions which we don’t even consciously do, like we add on height, race, past people that may have looked similar to the ratee. All this is done in a fraction of a second, which is what women do, but we sort of “zoom in” into what the nitty gritty and when we stop and think, we start to hesitate (like @cocainecowboy pointed here on my “which guy? thread) on the guy.
Not to mention that these photos we are rating. We are not rating them IRL, but over photos (and the rare video) through a camera phone lens through your computer screen.
Attraction is not black and white like PSL makes it out to be. Height, pheno, skin color, hair, face, frame, body are all taken into consideration for a women to find you attractive or not. Not just your “PSL” rating. However, PSL is very good at finding what the most women find attractive and WHY, but if you fall into the 2.5-6.5PSL range, women will have all types of biases and preferences.
Like I said, PSL should be strictly used analyze facial features, but NOT attractiveness to women. We will never know what women truly like and the harder you look for the answer, the more delusional you will become.
Thread inspired by @LordNorwood
Mentions: @cocainecowboy @Titbot @KEy21 @FatJattMofo @LordNorwood @ArabIncel @Dyorotic2 @OwlGod @tincelw @Deliciadecu @Gudru @chadpreetinthemaking @BigBoy
PSL is a very lose term, no one actually means that PSL rates mean. Everyone has their own slight variation on how they rate. It’s subjectively objective. We hone in on 1 agreed aspect which is face, but not everyone rates just face. We rate other things like height, race, skin color, etc along with face because we may just subconsciously coping even before the rate we think of comes into our heads. Attraction is based on a fraction of a second for everyone, but when you stop and think about it, you come to other conclusions which we don’t even consciously do, like we add on height, race, past people that may have looked similar to the ratee. All this is done in a fraction of a second, which is what women do, but we sort of “zoom in” into what the nitty gritty and when we stop and think, we start to hesitate (like @cocainecowboy pointed here on my “which guy? thread) on the guy.
Not to mention that these photos we are rating. We are not rating them IRL, but over photos (and the rare video) through a camera phone lens through your computer screen.
Attraction is not black and white like PSL makes it out to be. Height, pheno, skin color, hair, face, frame, body are all taken into consideration for a women to find you attractive or not. Not just your “PSL” rating. However, PSL is very good at finding what the most women find attractive and WHY, but if you fall into the 2.5-6.5PSL range, women will have all types of biases and preferences.
Like I said, PSL should be strictly used analyze facial features, but NOT attractiveness to women. We will never know what women truly like and the harder you look for the answer, the more delusional you will become.
Thread inspired by @LordNorwood
Mentions: @cocainecowboy @Titbot @KEy21 @FatJattMofo @LordNorwood @ArabIncel @Dyorotic2 @OwlGod @tincelw @Deliciadecu @Gudru @chadpreetinthemaking @BigBoy
