Why taller people are more attractive

VampyrMaxx

VampyrMaxx

π–†π–šπ–™π–Žπ–˜π–’ 𝖆𝖙 π–Žπ–™π–˜ π–‹π–Žπ–“π–Šπ–˜π–™
Joined
Oct 10, 2024
Posts
2,716
Reputation
2,952
This is going to explain my reasoning for why I think taller bodies mog in both men and women.

For men (assuming ideal proportion)

1. Taller individuals have taller legs, allowing them to cover more distance in shorter amounts of time

2. They have longer arms, allowing for more reach

3. They can support a wide ribcage and clavicle, without becoming endomorphic

4. Their bodies can support bigger featurea in general, which helps in functionality. Examples are bone width, length, mass such as big hands for example.

For women

1. One of the nicest features a woman can have is a slim ribcage and narrow feminine bidelt. If a short woman maintains the same hip size as a taller woman, this could cause her ribcage to grow horizontally, giving a masculine appearance. This will also give the stocky, endomorph, and unathletic appearance.

2. Taller woman can have bigger hips. In shorter woman, if they want to maintain proportions, their hip size will have to go down. This can make it harder to give birth. And wide hips are always a desired feature and give the hourglass shape.

3. Taller woman have longer arms and fingers giving a more modelesque look to their bodies.

4. Taller woman have longer legs and a shorter torso making them much more athletic than shorter woman.

Ideal female height (imo); 183 cm
Ideal male height (imo); 195 cm

 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: zaebalsya, browncurrycel, tunisianropemaxxer and 4 others
Ideal male frame
5364669 1758714452303
 
  • +1
Reactions: shmool, tunisianropemaxxer and NiZr
Oh shit

We got einstein over here

Taller people are more attractive?!?!?!

Smartass 😭😭
 
  • +1
Reactions: joaotorri, motionmantris and NiZr
is 5’2 good enough
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Dorogi, brotato78 and VampyrMaxx
Ideal female frame
5453750 Screenshot 20250810 063354 YouTube
 
NO FUCKING SHIT SHERLOCK

:feelskek::feelskek:

nigga made a thread on why taller people are more attractive


BROOO WE THOUGHT MANLETS WERE THE REAL DEAL AND ARE THE MOST ATTRACTIVE..THANK YOU FOR ENLIGHTENING US, FUCKING RETARD 😭😭
 
  • +1
Reactions: motionmantris and tunisianropemaxxer
This is going to explain my reasoning for why I think taller bodies mog in both men and women.

For men (assuming ideal proportion)

1. Taller individuals have taller legs, allowing them to cover more distance in shorter amounts of time

2. They have longer arms, allowing for more reach

3. They can support a wide ribcage and clavicle, without becoming endomorphic

4. Their bodies can support bigger featurea in general, which helps in functionality. Examples are bone width, length, mass such as big hands for example.

For women

1. One of the nicest features a woman can have is a slim ribcage and narrow feminine bidelt. If a short woman maintains the same hip size as a taller woman, this could cause her ribcage to grow horizontally, giving a masculine appearance. This will also give the stocky, endomorph, and unathletic appearance.

2. Taller woman can have bigger hips. In shorter woman, if they want to maintain proportions, their hip size will have to go down. This can make it harder to give birth. And wide hips are always a desired feature and give the hourglass shape.

3. Taller woman have longer arms and fingers giving a more modelesque look to their bodies.

4. Taller woman have longer legs and a shorter torso making them much more athletic than shorter woman.

Ideal female height (imo); 183 cm
Ideal male height (imo); 195 cm

Taller men are more appealing to women because woman feel safer around them and its also gonna give her better offsprings
 
  • +1
Reactions: VampyrMaxx and motionmantris
Oh shit

We got einstein over here

Taller people are more attractive?!?!?!

Smartass 😭😭
Some people on the forum believe shorter women are more beautiful so I made this thread.

Stfu, and go back to making your shit RR edit
 
- A sign of proper development.
- Socioeconomic status (serves as kind of a status symbol)
- More strength on average.
- Unlimited access to resources in the modern age.
- The most objective physical criterion, with little room for subjectivity.
 
  • +1
Reactions: VampyrMaxx
is 5'7 at 15 good enoughπŸ₯Ί
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: VampyrMaxx
Some people on the forum believe shorter women are more beautiful so I made this thread.

Stfu, and go back to making your shit RR edit
You fucking retard

People can think shorter women are more beautiful, that's their opinion. Women don't necessarily need to be tall to be likeable.

You're a fucking retard.
 
  • +1
Reactions: joaotorri, NoaA99, NiZr and 1 other person
I strongly disagree with the idea that taller women are more attractive, though.

Moderate, or even slightly smaller, stature is generally preferable.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: VampyrMaxx
You fucking retard

People can think shorter women are more beautiful, that's their opinion. Women don't necessarily need to be tall to be likeable.

You're a fucking retard.
You're a fucking faggot buddy. Read the thread before you comment your dogshit opinion.

Tall women mogs short women. Instead of commenting like a retard, give me proof otherwise.

But you wont because youre a repfarming faggot
 
Tall women mogs short women.
THAT'S YOUR FUCKING OPINION RETARD 😭 IT'S SUBJECTIVE

women's height isn't the same as men's height

taller men are more attractive, literally everyone on earth accepts that

but it's not the same with women, a lot of dudes will go for short women cuz they're petite and more cute I guess, not everyone goes for tall women.

fucking retard
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: joaotorri, NoaA99 and VampyrMaxx
THAT'S YOUR FUCKING OPINION RETARD 😭 IT'S SUBJECTIVE

women's height isn't the same as men's height

taller men are more attractive, literally everyone on earth accepts that

but it's not the same with women, a lot of dudes will go for short women cuz they're petite and more cute I guess, not everyone goes for tall women.

fucking retard
Dogshit opinion.

Wide hips (in measurement, not in proportion) are better for giving birth.

In a shorter women, their ribcage has to grow to maintain functionality. Wide ribcage is a masculine feature and unideal for female aesthetics.

Taller woman can maintain the wide hips while maintaining athleticism unlike a short woman.

This is why I disagree.

I respect your opinions on food, but your opinions on aesthetics are dogshit.

Iqmaxx before you talk, retarded faggot
 
Dogshit opinion.

Wide hips (in measurement, not in proportion) are better for giving birth.

In a shorter women, their ribcage has to grow to maintain functionality. Wide ribcage is a masculine feature and unideal for female aesthetics.

Taller woman can maintain the wide hips while maintaining athleticism unlike a short woman.

This is why I disagree.

I respect your opinions on food, but your opinions on aesthetics are dogshit.

Iqmaxx before you talk, retarded faggot
People don't give a fuck about muh giving birth muh ribcage functionality

Some people, including me, like short petite women, and would prefer those over taller women.

It's subjective, unlike men's height, where everyone accepts tall is better, but it's not the same with women.
 
  • +1
Reactions: joaotorri and NoaA99
People don't give a fuck about muh giving birth muh ribcage functionality

Some people, including me, like short petite women, and would prefer those over taller women.

It's subjective, unlike men's height, where everyone accepts tall is better, but it's not the same with women.
How tall?
 
THAT'S YOUR FUCKING OPINION RETARD 😭 IT'S SUBJECTIVE

women's height isn't the same as men's height

taller men are more attractive, literally everyone on earth accepts that

but it's not the same with women, a lot of dudes will go for short women cuz they're petite and more cute I guess, not everyone goes for tall women.

fucking retard
Actually, short to moderately tall women are preferred on average. The modeling industry does not equal attractiveness per se, when it comes to female height.

Also, from my personal observation, and from talking to non-autistic, non-turbo blackpilled men with an unbiased sense of attraction, almost all of them prefer shorter/ normal sized women if given the choice.

Nevertheless, height is far from the most important criterion in women.
 
How tall?
Holy fuck you retard, that's not the point here.

You're saying "muh ideal women height is 183cm

Literally almost nobody would agree with that.

IT'S SUBJECTIVE fucking faggot.

SOME MEN LIKE SHORT WOMEN, SOME LIKE TALL WOMEN.

IT'S NOT THE SAME WITH MENS HEIGHT WHERE EVERYONE PREFERS TALL

its different with women

lots of men like shorter women
 
Nevertheless, height is far from the most important criterion in women.
thats what im fucking saying

shorter & moderate height women are preferred

its not like mens height where everyone wants a tall man
 
  • +1
Reactions: NoaA99
Holy fuck you retard, that's not the point here.

You're saying "muh ideal women height is 183cm

Literally almost nobody would agree with that.

IT'S SUBJECTIVE fucking faggot.

SOME MEN LIKE SHORT WOMEN, SOME LIKE TALL WOMEN.

IT'S NOT THE SAME WITH MENS HEIGHT WHERE EVERYONE PREFERS TALL

its different with women

lots of men like shorter women
Seems like you cant handle a taller woman bud.

Above you said beauty is not correlated with functionality which is a trash opinion.

A short woman with wide hips will have to grow in her ribcage to maintain functionality. She literally has to lose athleticism to gain easier childbirth, while taller woman have both.

Saying functionality doesn't equal beauty, is retarded.
 
thats what im fucking saying

shorter & moderate height women are preferred

its not like mens height where everyone wants a tall man
Yeah, I agree.

Only on this site, kids prefer statures like this in women:
 

Attachments

  • Bildschirmfoto 2025-10-21 um 18.45.20.png
    Bildschirmfoto 2025-10-21 um 18.45.20.png
    2.6 MB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: asdvek
what does anything you listed have to do with attractiveness
 
Seems like you cant handle a taller woman bud.
holy fucking cope retard

just accept u want to get dominated by a tall woman and ur a stupid low t cuck that wasnt breastfed
 
  • +1
Reactions: NoaA99
Saying functionality doesn't equal beauty, is retarded
it quite literally almost doesnt matter

most people dont gaf about that in women

they just like short petite women
 
  • Nerd
Reactions: VampyrMaxx
holy fucking cope retard

just accept u want to get dominated by a tall woman and ur a stupid low t cuck that wasnt breastfed
Your the one coping.

Im 175cm. Im going to have to go with a shorter woman maybe around 163cm, because the man should be taller than the woman.

Just because I cant be with a taller woman, doesnt mean that they arent aesthetic.

And it also doesnt mean that 163cm is "unaesthetic". Just less ideal.

If anybody is coping its you.

Get off the forum and iqmaxx
 
Your the one coping.

Im 175cm. Im going to have to go with a shorter woman maybe around 163cm, because the man should be taller than the woman.

Just because I cant be with a taller woman, doesnt mean that they arent aesthetic.

And it also doesnt mean that 163cm is "unaesthetic". Just less ideal.

If anybody is coping its you.

Get off the forum and iqmaxx
i never said tall women arent unaesthetic

i said I PREFER short women, and many other men do

hang yourself faggot delete your account you're an irrelevant garbage user
 
  • +1
Reactions: VampyrMaxx
i never said tall women arent unaesthetic

i said I PREFER short women, and many other men do

hang yourself faggot delete your account you're an irrelevant garbage user
Ok buddy, how tall r u? Why u scared to share?
 
you're an irrelevant garbage user
Yea because people with dogshit opinions such as yourself hangout in off topic and make dogshit threads about muh "low t" and muh "Richard ramirez".

Fucking retard shoot yourself in the head
 
Yeah, I agree.

Only on this site, kids prefer statures like this in women:
No, she isnt ideal.

Something more ideal would be like Barbara Palvin. Tall, slender and wide hips.

Barbara palvin walks the runway during the 2018 victorias news photo 1575625912
32a912b3 9f76 47e9 8ae4 15a92de0a6c9 1760572379
Tumblr f2defc637734d82a27082bf4bb277ec6 3a844691 1280
 
No, she isnt ideal.

Something more ideal would be like Barbara Palvin. Tall, slender and wide hips.

View attachment 4231689View attachment 4231690View attachment 4231691
She’s at the high end of moderately tall, though.

Women 183β€―cm+ almost always look messed up proportion-wise, and almost like total abominations. Hell, even with decent proportions, they lose a huge chunk of femininity and submissiveness, regardless of proportions.

One of the most attractive parts of sex is the size difference, and being that tall completely kills the male-female dimorphic dynamic.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: VampyrMaxx
She’s at the high end of moderately tall, though.

Women 183β€―cm+ almost always look messed up proportion-wise, and almost like total abominations. Hell, even with decent proportions, they lose a huge chunk of femininity and submissiveness, regardless of proportions.

One of the most attractive parts of sex is the size difference, and being that tall completely kills the male-female dimorphic dynamic.
Barbara Palvin about 175cm, so shes definitely tall. Moderately tall ends around 170cm.

Taller woman can definitely have messed up proportions but it doesnt matter since Im talking about woman with ideal muscle insertions and limb proportionality.

Tall women do not lose femininity if their frames are good. Most peoples frames arent big enough to be able to dominate them. So they get insecure.

Tall women belong to tall men.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: NoaA99
Barbara Palvin about 175cm, so shes definitely tall. Moderately tall ends around 170cm.

Taller woman can definitely have messed up proportions but it doesnt matter since Im talking about woman with ideal muscle insertions and limb proportionality.

Tall women do not lose femininity if their frames are good. Most peoples frames arent big enough to be able to dominate them. So they get insecure.

Tall women belong to tall men.
As a German, 175β€―cm is at the high end of moderately tall. The average young woman is around 170β€―cm here.

Tall-ish height is strongly (male) dimorphic, so women this tall absolutely lose some femininity.

Tall men usually prefer shorter women as well, they’re visually more petite, feminine, and submissive.
Just an irrelevant anecdote: All my friends, who are 190β€―cm+ feel the same, given they have the freedom of choice. Most agree it’s not a huge deal overall, though.

Tall women, on average, have relatively smaller breasts and asses, because their body surface area is larger.
Broader bones, longer arms, larger hands, and wider shoulders further reduce perceived femininity and neoteny, which are important for female attractiveness.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: VampyrMaxx

Similar threads

VampyrMaxx
Replies
67
Views
505
offtogandyheaven
offtogandyheaven
VampyrMaxx
Replies
31
Views
611
VampyrMaxx
VampyrMaxx
VampyrMaxx
Replies
6
Views
620
WonkyChin186
WonkyChin186
JohnDoe
Replies
117
Views
1K
SoundnVision
SoundnVision

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top