Why the blackpill is false

[Deleted member 76261]

The “blackpill” claims that looks, genetics, or social status completely determine romantic success and that nothing can change that. This idea is overly simplistic and doesn’t hold up to evidence. 1. Behavior and Personality Matter - Confidence, humor, and social skills strongly influence how attractive someone appears. People notice how someone makes them feel, not just how they look. Research in social psychology shows that charisma and personality traits can outweigh minor physical imperfections. 2. Attraction Is Subjective - Beauty standards vary by culture, community, and personal taste. What one person finds unattractive, another might find irresistible. The blackpill ignores this variability and assumes everyone sees the same “ideal.” 3. Social and Emotional Factors - Shared interests, mutual respect, and emotional intelligence heavily influence romantic connections. How someone communicates, listens, and connects emotionally matters far more than rigid physical standards. 4. Real-World Evidence - Many people who don’t fit conventional beauty ideals still have successful relationships. History and everyday life show countless examples of attraction that go beyond genetics or looks. Conclusion The blackpill is a pessimistic oversimplification. Looks are only one part of a complex social equation, and evidence shows that attraction and romantic success cannot be reduced to genetics alone.




.

 

[grilldaddy❤️]

Heavy DNR

 

[Toggle9877]

Heavy DNR

 

[inversions]

Heavy DNR

 

[paz]

Heavy DNR

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

Black pill(looks)/ red pill(status, money, high T traits, bad boy)

There is more at play

However when you write such an essay (especially the cage fuel portion about emotional intellegence)

You're failing to account for the fact that the blackpill still overpowers everything

There ARE individuals so good looking thats all they need

And there ARE individuals so ugly there's nothing they can do

If both exist. The blackpill reigns Supreme

Im not pessimistic, and I don't personally blame my looks

But neither do I overlook these two groups and thus have to disagree.

 

[Klasik616]

Jfl at beauty is subjective

 

[Deleted member 76261]

Jfl at beauty is subjective

a little bit

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

Jfl at beauty is subjective

It is often based upon 2 factors

What your father looks like, and the societal ideal

The Anima/ animus, is the impression or subconscious image of a woman, or a man

When you spend your youth with your mother, thats what a woman is to you, that's your image of it

Same for daughters and their fathers

 

[hyoid]

dnr

 

[underatedgreycel]

“How’d you know I have severe mental retardation?”

 

[FlotPSL]

The “blackpill” claims that looks, genetics, or social status completely determine romantic success and that nothing can change that. This idea is overly simplistic and doesn’t hold up to evidence. 1. Behavior and Personality Matter - Confidence, humor, and social skills strongly influence how attractive someone appears. People notice how someone makes them feel, not just how they look. Research in social psychology shows that charisma and personality traits can outweigh minor physical imperfections. 2. Attraction Is Subjective - Beauty standards vary by culture, community, and personal taste. What one person finds unattractive, another might find irresistible. The blackpill ignores this variability and assumes everyone sees the same “ideal.” 3. Social and Emotional Factors - Shared interests, mutual respect, and emotional intelligence heavily influence romantic connections. How someone communicates, listens, and connects emotionally matters far more than rigid physical standards. 4. Real-World Evidence - Many people who don’t fit conventional beauty ideals still have successful relationships. History and everyday life show countless examples of attraction that go beyond genetics or looks. Conclusion The blackpill is a pessimistic oversimplification. Looks are only one part of a complex social equation, and evidence shows that attraction and romantic success cannot be reduced to genetics alone.




.

Here is actually why the blackpill is false

Women have stopped selecting for the best man and instead go with oofy doofy

end of discussion

 

[Deleted member 76261]

@grilldaddy❤️ @Toggle9877 @inversions @paz @Gaygymmaxx @Klasik616 @FlotPSL

guys leave a rep please was half an hour on it

 

[grilldaddy❤️]

@grilldaddy❤️ @Toggle9877 @inversions @paz @Gaygymmaxx @Klasik616 @FlotPSL

guys leave a rep please was half an hour on it

Alr bhai

 

[Toggle9877]

@grilldaddy❤️ @Toggle9877 @inversions @paz @Gaygymmaxx @Klasik616 @FlotPSL

guys leave a rep please was half an hour on it

Ok

 

[Rothschild]

Heavy DNR

 

[idkwhattodo69]

The “blackpill” claims that looks, genetics, or social status completely determine romantic success and that nothing can change that. This idea is overly simplistic and doesn’t hold up to evidence. 1. Behavior and Personality Matter - Confidence, humor, and social skills strongly influence how attractive someone appears. People notice how someone makes them feel, not just how they look. Research in social psychology shows that charisma and personality traits can outweigh minor physical imperfections. 2. Attraction Is Subjective - Beauty standards vary by culture, community, and personal taste. What one person finds unattractive, another might find irresistible. The blackpill ignores this variability and assumes everyone sees the same “ideal.” 3. Social and Emotional Factors - Shared interests, mutual respect, and emotional intelligence heavily influence romantic connections. How someone communicates, listens, and connects emotionally matters far more than rigid physical standards. 4. Real-World Evidence - Many people who don’t fit conventional beauty ideals still have successful relationships. History and everyday life show countless examples of attraction that go beyond genetics or looks. Conclusion The blackpill is a pessimistic oversimplification. Looks are only one part of a complex social equation, and evidence shows that attraction and romantic success cannot be reduced to genetics alone.




.

Jfl go back to watching disney movies grey

 

[idkwhattodo69]

Heavy DNR

 

[Deleted member 76261]

Jfl go back to watching disney movies grey

u are a grey 228 post