Why the fuck do normies try to say looks are subjective and not objective.

R

Roamer

professional softmaxxer
Joined
Apr 7, 2023
Posts
1,024
Reputation
1,051
They try to demonise it completely even though deep down they know its true.
If you even say anything to do with it you will get cancelled by normies.
 
  • +1
Reactions: T50 Mogger, Deleted member 8365 and WanderingBurro
Subjective to an extent of course, but the general framework of health related features being preferable is fairly objective.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 5'8manlet, Deleted member 27472, AppealMaxxing and 6 others
It's only subjective when it comes to what kind of chad someone likes
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: T50 Mogger and Av0nr
Cope

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: rand anon, russwestbrook and Deleted member 29581
Subjective to an extent of course, but the general framework of health related features being preferable is fairly objective.
I agree. I belive in types but also in conventional attractiveness.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: forevermirin
kevin hart mogs gandy bro despite being 5‘2 its his persoonality and two cold showers a day
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Av0nr, MagaPutinism, Deleted member 29581 and 1 other person
I agree. I belive in types but also in conventional attractiveness.
I mean shit like jaw, hair (not balding), skin, height etc. are indicators of health so they are objectively attractive while things like hair color, eyeshape, expression face gives off like high/low trust etc. are more subjective things.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Roamer
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 29167, Deleted member 29581 and HarrierDuBois
Subjective to an extent of course, but the general framework of health related features being preferable is fairly objective.
why the fuck is Chico pulling his hair like a schizo in your pfp
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 29581 and HarrierDuBois
I mean shit like jaw, hair (not balding), skin, height etc. are indicators of health so they are objectively attractive while things like hair color, eyeshape, expression face gives off like high/low trust etc. are more subjective things.
But then again it would be objective since some of the unfortunate people end up having deformities which no one is going to find attractive... which will make them invisible.
 
  • +1
Reactions: T50 Mogger, Deleted member 2816 and forevermirin
why the fuck is Chico pulling his hair like a schizo in your pfp
Had to ensure his god-tier anime eye area was properly flaunted for his model vid.
Best Franchisco Lachowski GIFs | Gfycat
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Roamer
ITs only subjective once theres chads of different phenos. Everything less than that is objective
 
  • +1
Reactions: T50 Mogger and Roamer
Nah attraction is subjective but beauty is objective.
If some people find blond hair more beautiful than black hair, then it is too subjective.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 29167 and Roamer
If some people find blond hair more beautiful than black hair, then it is too subjective.
Mhm, but nobody will find a lopsided face attractive compared to a symmetrical face.
 
Mhm, but nobody will find a lopsided face attractive compared to a symmetrical face.
Slight asymmetry is proven to be more attractive than complete symmetry since it looks less uncanny.
 
some girls dont even like maher and chico, its subjective to an extent. the thing is the more conventionally attractive you are, the higher percentage of girls like you, but its never at 100% for anybody
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19294, Deleted member 8365, klamus and 6 others
Slight asymmetry is proven to be more attractive than complete symmetry since it looks less uncanny.
Life fuel.
I mean someone who has a clear deformity where their entire face looks like its melting, compared to someone who is symmetrical enough that you wouldn't even notice the asymmetries irl
 
  • +1
Reactions: HarrierDuBois
some girls dont even like maher and chico, its subjective to an extent. the thing is the more conventionally attractive you are, the higher percentage of girls like you, but its never at 100% for anybody
Fair point. But that's why I said attraction is subjective but beauty is not.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 29167
some girls dont even like maher and chico, its subjective to an extent. the thing is the more conventionally attractive you are, the higher percentage of girls like you, but its never at 100% for anybody
Couldn't have said it any better
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 29167
People's individual ratings are normally distributed around the actual rating. So like for an actual 8, let's say like 68% of people will rate them 7.5-8.5, then 13% will rate 7-7.5 or 8.5-9, and then 2% 6.5-7 or 9-9.5, and then some small percent <6.5 and >9.5. And then I would define less than 6 as not attractive. So some very small percent of people find an 8 not attractive or not that attractive.

Some people may be more or less divisive than others with either tighter or wider distributions.
 
  • +1
Reactions: T50 Mogger
They try to demonise it completely even though deep down they know its true.
If you even say anything to do with it you will get cancelled by normies.

It's objective till a certain threshold, after it becomes subjective.
 
jfl short people live longer and lots of muscle isn't even healthier for you
Being taller with longer limbs increases fighting success so muh lives longer when gets slaughtered is also a factor to keep in mind. Although this applies less in modern societies.
 
  • +1
Reactions: T50 Mogger

Similar threads

asdvek
Replies
3
Views
134
Luquier
Luquier
shieldzz
Replies
2
Views
52
CorinthianLOX
CorinthianLOX
hasba1feuj
Replies
35
Views
309
hasba1feuj
hasba1feuj
lowltn222
Replies
7
Views
113
rawr
rawr
J
Replies
36
Views
299
JohnDoe
J

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top