why true blackpillers will have worse looking gf's (always)

bp_1

bp_1

hgh hater, shortcel, narrow palate cel
Joined
Apr 17, 2025
Posts
1,365
Reputation
1,602
this is something that should be water but most org users dont realize this.

any blackpiller who has ascended from low - mid tier normie has only had hate for females. because of the community in general. true blackpillers feel very insecure around looksmatched women or women in general. they will date tiers below to feel less insecure. in the end, its really not about getting better looking offspring for them, but to not feel mogged by a woman.

it feeds their lack of attention and love growing up when people compliment them more and say the girl is lucky to have the guy.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: widdi, ewri, Informationcapitali and 13 others
this is something that should be water but most org users dont realize this.

any blackpiller who has ascended from low - mid tier normie has only had hate for females. because of the community in general. true blackpillers feel very insecure around looksmatched women or women in general. they will date tiers below to feel less insecure. in the end, its really not about getting better looking offspring for them, but to not feel mogged by a woman.

it feeds their lack of attention and love growing up when people compliment them more and say the girl is lucky to have the guy.
clavicular, chalom (quite literally chad and mid ltb), loox etc.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
  • JFL
Reactions: Informationcapitali, PrettyLights, MiserableMan and 1 other person
"We date below our level because ego beats attraction. Being with a better-looking girl reminds us of what we hate about ourselves. Control feels safer than equality, so we pick someone who won’t make us feel inferior. It’s not about love or looks — it’s damage control."

-chatgpt
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: greycel, Informationcapitali, Primalsplit and 6 others
this is something that should be water but most org users dont realize this.

any blackpiller who has ascended from low - mid tier normie has only had hate for females. because of the community in general. true blackpillers feel very insecure around looksmatched women or women in general. they will date tiers below to feel less insecure. in the end, its really not about getting better looking offspring for them, but to not feel mogged by a woman.

it feeds their lack of attention and love growing up when people compliment them more and say the girl is lucky to have the guy.
not water tbh

people think the girls that clav dates are proof that hes truly mtn

good thread
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: widdi, Primalsplit, karmacita901 and 4 others
"We date below our level because ego beats attraction. Being with a better-looking girl reminds us of what we hate about ourselves. Control feels safer than equality, so we pick someone who won’t make us feel inferior. It’s not about love or looks — it’s damage control."

-chatgpt
pretty much. imagine your whole life being about becoming better looking than muh foids. and someone outside says "you dont deserve your gf, shes a tier above u"

btw women rarely say this about other women.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Zygotic, SouthAfricancel, PrettyLights and 4 others
I am the exact opposite jfl, if the girl doesn't gigamog me by my own standard I insta dislike her for having subhuman genes . I legit ascended from subhuman too so this should logically apply to me but it doesn't. I get disgusted when I look better then a girl.

Edit: I think this actually applies more to looksmaxers then blackpillers in general. Because I personally never really tried to "ascend" or shit I just grew into my looks naturally with age, but looksmaxers put so much effort into looking better for women that they always think they are "frauding" in a way so they think they deserve a worse looking girl. If you actually belive genetics are everything and just naturally look HTN or smh without trying I don't get how you could be into girls that look worse then you, because you literally mog them at your bare minimum. You would at least go for your looksmatch then.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: Primalsplit, Zygotic, karmacita901 and 4 others
I am the exact opposite jfl, if the girl doesn't gigamog me by my own standard I insta dislike her for having subhuman genes . I legit ascended from subhuman too so this should logically apply to me but it doesn't. I get disgusted when I look better then a girl.

Edit: I think this actually applies more to looksmaxers then blackpillers in general. Because I personally never really tried to "ascend" or shit I just grew into my looks naturally with age, but looksmaxers put so much effort into looking better for women that they always think they are "frauding" in a way so they think they deserve a worse looking girl. If you actually belive genetics are everything and just naturally look HTN or smh without trying I don't get how you could be into girls that look worse then you, because you literally mog them at your bare minimum. You would at least go for your looksmatch then.
op you are coping, you arent a blackpiller. probably just someone who accepts the idealogy but hasnt experienced it.

if you ascended from subhuman to idk whatever u are rn without looksmaxxing, u werent even subhuman. blackpillers are those who have had experienced the blackpill irl. but yes a natural htn wont go for worse looking girls, but he wont try to go over his league too (usually).
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mr_Peptide_Pinner, StacySexuaI, robotchicken and 1 other person
op you are coping, you arent a blackpiller. probably just someone who accepts the idealogy but hasnt experienced it.

if you ascended from subhuman to idk whatever u are rn without looksmaxxing, u werent even subhuman. blackpillers are those who have had experienced the blackpill irl. but yes a natural htn wont go for worse looking girls, but he wont try to go over his league too (usually).
I ascended from like low LTN to high MTN, but I never looksmaxed (except like getting a haircut and mewing lol). I used to get brutally bullied untill I was like 16yo because I was fat, short and ugly. Still khhv at 23 now, but I would never go for a girl that looks worse then me (I could have plenty of times, even had LTB girls apprach me). Just because you think a certain way doesn't mean every other blackpiller is the same, I refuse to let my abused dog childhood rule over me, I will get my htb+ or I will die volcel. In a way I think I am more blackpilled then 90+% of niggas here because I do actually only want a girl with superior genetics insted of "attention" from normie subhumans, idgaf what faggot normies think of me tbh I hate them all anyways.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Primalsplit, Zygotic, karmacita901 and 2 others
Imagine not wanting to get the hottest girl possible.
Low T behavior.
Any man with a functioning high IQ brain wants the hottest girl possible.
Even if you're Gigachad, you should want Terastacy.
It's only diehard blackpillers who want to mog their girls.
And it's only redpill copers who preach "she's a 3, but she has genuine desire" lmao.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Primalsplit, karmacita901, SouthAfricancel and 1 other person
I ascended from like low LTN to high MTN, but I never looksmaxed (except like getting a haircut and mewing lol). I used to get brutally bullied untill I was like 16yo because I was fat, short and ugly. Still khhv at 23 now, but I would never go for a girl that looks worse then me (I could have plenty of times, even had LTB girls apprach me). Just because you think a certain way doesn't mean every other blackpiller is the same, I refuse to let my abused dog childhood rule over me, I will get my htb+ or I will die volcel. In a way I think I am more blackpilled then 90+% of niggas here because I do actually only want a girl with superior genetics insted of "attention" from normie subhumans, idgaf what faggot normies think of me tbh I hate them all anyways.
well maybe you just more mature tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zygotic, Mr_Peptide_Pinner, robotchicken and 1 other person
No it’s because they don’t have rizz and are too insecure to get the girl.
 
  • +1
Reactions: karmacita901, Mr_Peptide_Pinner and autistic_tendencies
Imagine not wanting to get the hottest girl possible.
Low T behavior.
Any man with a functioning high IQ brain wants the hottest girl possible.
Even if you're Gigachad, you should want Terastacy.
It's only diehard blackpillers who want to mog their girls.
And it's only redpill copers who preach "she's a 3, but she has genuine desire" lmao.
you are coping, an attractive set of parents doesnt necessarily mean an attractive offspring. also all women with such high smv will cheat on u even if ur chadlite or chad because a stacy has literally 100's of ew guys msging her daily
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mr_Peptide_Pinner
you gotta change your mindset as sell
Let go of all hate and resentment toward the enemy
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mr_Peptide_Pinner and BigBoy
  • +1
Reactions: Primalsplit and Mr_Peptide_Pinner
you are coping, an attractive set of parents doesnt necessarily mean an attractive offspring. also all women with such high smv will cheat on u even if ur chadlite or chad because a stacy has literally 100's of ew guys msging her daily

Sure and tomorrow I might get hit by a car and go bye bye, so why even bother doing anything by your logic?
There are no guarantees in life.
The more attractive the woman, the more likely the kid will be attractive. It's a probability game and that's good enough for me.
Humans are biological machines trying to pass on their genes and ideally improve them in the next iteration. That's my stance on it.

Just like people think going for a less attractive women might reduce their chances of getting cheated, which is true, but again, no guarantees. That's the game they want to play, not the one I want to play.

Whether people think the girl mogs me or I mog her, is irrelevant to me. I couldn't give a crap. The only thing I care about is getting what I want.

If the man mogs the girl, he can fuck her with little to no effort and investment anyway. There is no point in tolerating her past that point. Slum busting and dumpster diving is fine for a bit, but it's not sustainable, it corrupts the soul.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Primalsplit, karmacita901 and autistic_tendencies
Sure and tomorrow I might get hit by a car and go bye bye, so why even bother doing anything by your logic?
There are no guarantees in life.
The more attractive the woman, the more likely the kid will be attractive. It's a probability game and that's good enough for me.
Humans are biological machines trying to pass on their genes and ideally improve them in the next iteration. That's my stance on it.

Just like people think going for a less attractive women might reduce their chances of getting cheated, which is true, but again, no guarantees. That's the game they want to play, not the one I want to play.

Whether people think the girl mogs me or I mog her, is irrelevant to me. I couldn't give a crap. The only thing I care about is getting what I want.

If the man mogs the girl, he can fuck her with little to no effort and investment anyway. There is no point in tolerating her past that point. Slum busting and dumpster diving is fine for a bit, but it's not sustainable, it corrupts the soul.
not my point. better to get with an ltb with a clear past. than a stacy whos a ran through whore. you are a genuine cuck if you would do that.

also its not a game of probability, her looks arent the only thing that affect it. what if you both are a carrier for a cancer? what if you have blue eyes but she is recessive for that? what if she also a gene for a cuck jewish nose and u do too and because u both mate ur child is eternally fucked? anyways not the point im trying to make
attractiveness is highly dependent on health of the mother, father and the diet the child is fed. which is why most kids are cute growing up but become recessed subhumans later on.
 
not my point. better to get with an ltb with a clear past. than a stacy whos a ran through whore. you are a genuine cuck if you would do that.

also its not a game of probability, her looks arent the only thing that affect it. what if you both are a carrier for a cancer? what if you have blue eyes but she is recessive for that? what if she also a gene for a cuck jewish nose and u do too and because u both mate ur child is eternally fucked? anyways not the point im trying to make
attractiveness is highly dependent on health of the mother, father and the diet the child is fed. which is why most kids are cute growing up but become recessed subhumans later on.

Most women are run through, even ltbs, in the west. If she's past 16? Odds are against you that she'll be a virgin. Past 20? Forget it. You're just debating whether 5 dudes or 15 is worse. She ain't a virgin either way kiddo. Also, most studies done on the subject has shown that the more attractive a woman is, the less lifetime sexual partners she has and the less she cheats, not more. It's women in the middle of the scale that are the most promiscuous. Now of course that might be because hotter women are more likely to lock down the guy they want, thus they don't bother jumping from dick to dick riding the cock carousel by essentially being gamblers at a casino for the slight chance they might lock some stud. But that's besides the point, the data is clear, more attractive women are less run through and cheat less.

Sure, and she might have some hidden genetic disorder or some crap, not immediate visible, she might even not know it. Or she might be completely retarded once you talk to her, like legit 75 IQ, and in that case you can instantly bail of course. But reality is that beauty is by far the best indicator of genetic quality. Stop coping here.

Most babies and little kids are cute, because they are designed to be that way by nature in order to survive, or the investment of the mother would have been minimal to none. Most little kids that don't grow up cute, is not because of bad diet, but because their genes aren't that great. Unless there is significant malnutrition, the diet will barely have any significant effect on the development of the kid.

Sure, the father's and the mother's genes affect how the kid will turn out. For example, sub5+stacy has higher chances of having a better looking kid than a sub5+sub5. Common sense. It's no rocket science.
 
  • +1
Reactions: karmacita901
Most women are run through, even ltbs, in the west. If she's past 16? Odds are against you that she'll be a virgin. Past 20? Forget it. You're just debating whether 5 dudes or 15 is worse. She ain't a virgin either way kiddo. Also, most studies done on the subject has shown that the more attractive a woman is, the less lifetime sexual partners she has and the less she cheats, not more. It's women in the middle of the scale that are the most promiscuous. Now of course that might be because hotter women are more likely to lock down the guy they want, thus they don't bother jumping from dick to dick riding the cock carousel by essentially being gamblers at a casino for the slight chance they might lock some stud. But that's besides the point, the data is clear, more attractive women are less run through and cheat less.

Sure, and she might have some hidden genetic disorder or some crap, not immediate visible, she might even not know it. Or she might be completely retarded once you talk to her, like legit 75 IQ, and in that case you can instantly bail of course. But reality is that beauty is by far the best indicator of genetic quality. Stop coping here.

Most babies and little kids are cute, because they are designed to be that way by nature in order to survive, or the investment of the mother would have been minimal to none. Most little kids that don't grow up cute, is not because of bad diet, but because their genes aren't that great. Unless there is significant malnutrition, the diet will barely have any significant effect on the development of the kid.

Sure, the father's and the mother's genes affect how the kid will turn out. For example, sub5+stacy has higher chances of having a better looking kid than a sub5+sub5. Common sense. It's no rocket science.
dude i mean no offense but you should not speak on genetics, attractiveness or anything that determines it if you arent knowledgeable enough.
i wont even argue on the first paragraph because its not trying to be objective, its just your perspective. and i respect it even if i disagree.

anyways kids that dont grow up good looking is because genes arent that great? do you even know how genes work? do you even understand what a gene does? your dna sequence is genetic sure but environmental markers affect everything. even if barett was good looking eating slop, its not because his genes were 'great' in the sense of dna sequence. even if that is true.

your grandparents trauma from world war 2 affects you today. your mothers prenatal testosterone affects your looks. your mothers diet and health affects u today. why do you think jaws grow downwards and why do you think some peoples face narrows down?

jfl there is no dna sequence that automatically makes ur jaw forward grown, its all epigenetic. dependent on your environment and myofunctional habbits.


just to show you how retarded your argument is, il use a very basic analogy. if its all just genes, why does a smoking mom have a lighter weight baby? a baby witha. worse skull? i guess the cigarettes sub human genetics raped the mom.
 
dude i mean no offense but you should not speak on genetics, attractiveness or anything that determines it if you arent knowledgeable enough.
i wont even argue on the first paragraph because its not trying to be objective, its just your perspective. and i respect it even if i disagree.

anyways kids that dont grow up good looking is because genes arent that great? do you even know how genes work? do you even understand what a gene does? your dna sequence is genetic sure but environmental markers affect everything. even if barett was good looking eating slop, its not because his genes were 'great' in the sense of dna sequence. even if that is true.

your grandparents trauma from world war 2 affects you today. your mothers prenatal testosterone affects your looks. your mothers diet and health affects u today. why do you think jaws grow downwards and why do you think some peoples face narrows down?

jfl there is no dna sequence that automatically makes ur jaw forward grown, its all epigenetic. dependent on your environment and myofunctional habbits.


just to show you how retarded your argument is, il use a very basic analogy. if its all just genes, why does a smoking mom have a lighter weight baby? a baby witha. worse skull? i guess the cigarettes sub human genetics raped the mom.


My perspective on sexual partners, cheating and the attractiveness of the woman is based on data. Also, if blank slate means a virgin, the odds are against you, past let's say high school, that's just reality in the west.

Epigenetics have some verifiable merit, but you exaggerate their effect. It's more like a subtle fine tuner and less as the foundation of how someone will turn out to be. Plus some of the claims made when it comes to epigenetics have consitently failed replication. Within an environment of enough abundance, like the one in the West, and reasonable healthy lifestyle, epigenetics are only a fraction of the whole equation. Heritability of facial attractiveness accounts for 50 up to like 80%.

People with downward grown faces in most cases have parents, or at least one parent, with a downgrown face. What a coincidence, huh?
 
Douchebag went on a generational run in this thread 😫
 
  • JFL
Reactions: mrdouchebag
you are coping, an attractive set of parents doesnt necessarily mean an attractive offspring. also all women with such high smv will cheat on u even if ur chadlite or chad because a stacy has literally 100's of ew guys msging her daily
All women have htn+ equivalent smv in the west goofy. Even the grimiest LTB could have 40 guys in her dm's if she thirst trapped hard enough
 
  • +1
Reactions: bp_1, spongebobsex and Zygotic
pretty much. imagine your whole life being about becoming better looking than muh foids. and someone outside says "you dont deserve your gf, shes a tier above u"

btw women rarely say this about other women.
that's what I would say
 
  • +1
Reactions: bp_1
this is something that should be water but most org users dont realize this.

any blackpiller who has ascended from low - mid tier normie has only had hate for females. because of the community in general. true blackpillers feel very insecure around looksmatched women or women in general. they will date tiers below to feel less insecure. in the end, its really not about getting better looking offspring for them, but to not feel mogged by a woman.

it feeds their lack of attention and love growing up when people compliment them more and say the girl is lucky to have the guy.
Does t that go against juggernaut theory though
 
idk mang I feel out of place & frustrated when I'm on a "date" with a girl from tinder that is 2 tiers below me, and then they think im SHY & "just nervous" when I don't make a move on them :lul:
When with a true "eve" im feel more alive, but that is SUPER RARE ;((((
But I don't hate them tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: bp_1
My perspective on sexual partners, cheating and the attractiveness of the woman is based on data. Also, if blank slate means a virgin, the odds are against you, past let's say high school, that's just reality in the west.

Epigenetics have some verifiable merit, but you exaggerate their effect. It's more like a subtle fine tuner and less as the foundation of how someone will turn out to be. Plus some of the claims made when it comes to epigenetics have consitently failed replication. Within an environment of enough abundance, like the one in the West, and reasonable healthy lifestyle, epigenetics are only a fraction of the whole equation. Heritability of facial attractiveness accounts for 50 up to like 80%.

People with downward grown faces in most cases have parents, or at least one parent, with a downgrown face. What a coincidence, huh?
dnr chat gpt slop. also last point is retarded even if its true (which it isnt because theres no clear trend as such you claim) because downgrown jaws are a result of inherited allergies or bad health of the parent which is an explanation to that. theres no gene that makes ur parent downgrown.
 
dnr chat gpt slop. also last point is retarded even if its true (which it isnt because theres no clear trend as such you claim) because downgrown jaws are a result of inherited allergies or bad health of the parent which is an explanation to that. theres no gene that makes ur parent downgrown.

There is a trend lmao. It's called uglier people in the vast majority of cases have uglier kids. One ugly person and one beautiful person? Chances go up considerably that your kid will escape the curse of ugly compared to both parents being ugly. Easy to understand and that was my original point. At no point have I claimed that epigenetics aren't a thing or environment doesn't matter etc, you're just heavily exaggerating their effect. And of course there is no single gene that affects how downward grown the face will be, who the fuck knows how many affect it.

It's like some sub2 wondering why they have no success with women. There are so many variables and traits that technically might tilt the scales in your favor or against you, to varying degree. But we all know what's the big issue, the elephant in the room, what is most likely the reason the overwhelming majority of the time... he's just ugly.
 
this is something that should be water but most org users dont realize this.

any blackpiller who has ascended from low - mid tier normie has only had hate for females. because of the community in general. true blackpillers feel very insecure around looksmatched women or women in general. they will date tiers below to feel less insecure. in the end, its really not about getting better looking offspring for them, but to not feel mogged by a woman.

it feeds their lack of attention and love growing up when people compliment them more and say the girl is lucky to have the guy.
Abused dog behaviour
 
There is a trend lmao. It's called uglier people in the vast majority of cases have uglier kids. One ugly person and one beautiful person? Chances go up considerably that your kid will escape the curse of ugly compared to both parents being ugly. Easy to understand and that was my original point. At no point have I claimed that epigenetics aren't a thing or environment doesn't matter etc, you're just heavily exaggerating their effect. And of course there is no single gene that affects how downward grown the face will be, who the fuck knows how many affect it.

It's like some sub2 wondering why they have no success with women. There are so many variables and traits that technically might tilt the scales in your favor or against you, to varying degree. But we all know what's the big issue, the elephant in the room, what is most likely the reason the overwhelming majority of the time... he's just ugly.
absolute retard, epigentics is 80-90% of attractiveness

also its not a trend, better looking people dont statsitically also have a linear trend of having good looking gkids
 
  • JFL
Reactions: mrdouchebag
absolute retard, epigentics is 80-90% of attractiveness

also its not a trend, better looking people dont statsitically also have a linear trend of having good looking gkids

Keep coping, keep mewing.
 

Similar threads

AustrianMogger
Replies
13
Views
180
AressGymMaxx
AressGymMaxx
Sloppyseconds
Replies
30
Views
1K
gimmedatacc
gimmedatacc
Shrek2OnDvD
Replies
122
Views
1K
LTNUser
LTNUser
Elegant
Replies
38
Views
1K
SanTheTrucel
SanTheTrucel

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top